Asymmetric priming effects in visual processing of occlusion patterns

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 946-958

  Plomp, Gijs ^a   Van Leeuwen, Cees ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746411353     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193357     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ALBRIGHT, T. D., & STONER, G. R. (2002). Contextual influences on visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 339-379.
2. ALTMANN, C. F., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & KOURTZI, Z. (2003). Perceptual organization of local elements into global shapes in the human visual cortex. Current Biology, 13, 342-349.
3. BELLER, H. K. (1971). Priming: Effects of advance information on matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 176-182.
4. BRUNO, N., BERTAMINI, M., & DOMINI, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there a mosaic stage? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1412-1426.
5. BUFFART, H., & LEEUWENBERG, E. (1981). Coding theory of visual pattern completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 241-274.
6. BUFFART, H., LEEUWENBERG, E., & RESTLE, F. (1983). Analysis of ambiguity in visual pattern completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 980-1000.
7. GERBINO, W., & SALMASO, D. (1987). The effect of a modal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychologica, 65, 25-46.
8. HOAGLIN, D. C., MOSTELLER, F., & TUKEY, J. W. (EDS.) (2000). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York: Wiley. (Original work published 1983)
9. HOCHBERG, J. (2003). Acts of perceptual inquiry: Problems for any stimulus-based simplicity theory. Acta Psychologica, 114, 215-228.
10. JOSEPH, J. S., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1999). Amodal representation depends on the object seen before partial occlusion. Vision Research, 39, 283-292.
11. KAMITANI, Y., & SHIMOJO, S. (2004). Global yet early processing of visual surfaces. In L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. KANIZSA, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
13. KANIZSA, G., & GERBINO, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. KELLMAN, P. J., & SHIPLEY, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
15. LEE, T. S., YANG, C. F., ROMERO, R. D., & MUMFORD, D. (2002). Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 589-597.
16. LEEUWENBERG, E., MENS, L., & CALIS, G. (1985). Knowledge within perception: Masking caused by incompatible interpretation. Acta Psychologica, 59, 91-102.
17. MICHOTTE, A., THINÈS, G., & CRABBÉ, G. (1964). Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives (Studia Psychologica). Louvain: Publications universitaires de Louvain.
18. NIKOLAEV, A. R., & VAN LEEUWEN, C. (2004). Flexibility in spatial and non-spatial feature grouping: An event-related potentials study. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 13-25.
19. PETERSON, M. A., & HOCHBERG, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 183-193.
20. PINHEIRO, J. C., & BATES, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
21. PLOMP, G., NAKATANI, C., BONNARDEL, V., & VAN LEEUWEN, C. (2004). Amodal completion as reflected by gaze durations. Perception, 33, 1185-1200.
22. PRATT, J., & SEKULER, A. B. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
23. RAUSCHENBERGER, R., PETERSON, M. A., MOSCA, F., & BRUNO, N. (2004). Amodal completion in visual search: Preemption or context effects? Psychological Science, 15, 351-355.
24. RAUSCHENBERGER, R., & YANTIS, S. (2001). Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature, 410, 369-372.
25. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
26. SEKULER, A. B., & PALMER, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 21, 95-111.
27. SEKULER, A. B., PALMER, S. E., & FLYNN, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260-267.
28. SHIPLEY, T. F., & KELLMAN, P. J. (2003). Boundary completion in illusory contours: Interpolation or extrapolation? Perception, 32, 985-999.
29. STINS, J. F., & VAN LEEUWEN, C. (1993). Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 34-42.
30. VAN LEEUWEN, C., & LACHMANN, T. (2004). Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 908-925.
31. VAN LIER, R. J., LEEUWENBERG, E. L. J., & VAN DER HELM, P. A. (1995). Multiple completions primed by occlusion patterns. Perception, 24, 727-740.
32. VAN LIER, R. J., VAN DER HELM, P. A., & LEEUWENBERG, E. L. J. (1995). Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 571-583.
33. ZEMEL, R. S., BEHRMANN, M., & MOZER, M. C. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 202-217.