Economic growth and biodiversity loss in an age of tradable permits

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1042-1050

  Rosales, Jon ^a  

^a ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cap and trade; Emissions trading; Kyoto Protocol; Science policy process

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; EMISSIONS TRADING; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

AIR POLLUTION; BIODIVERSITY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LEGAL ASPECT; LICENSING; REVIEW;

AIR POLLUTION; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECONOMICS; LICENSURE;

EID: 33746379542     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00374.x     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Anderson, J. L. 2001. Stone-age minds at work on 21st century science: how cognitive psychology can inform conservation biology. Conservation Biology in Practice 2:20-27.
2. Bonnie, R., and S. Schwartzman. 2003. Tropical reforestation and deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Conservation Biology 17:4.
3. Conservation Finance Alliance. 2005. Conservation finance guide. Conservation Finance Alliance, Washington, D.C. Available from http:// guide.conservationfinance.org/chapter/index.cfm?Page=2 (accessed June 2005).
4. Czech, B. 2000. Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:4-15.
5. Czech, B. 2003a. Technological progress and biodiversity conservation: a dollar spent, a dollar burned. Conservation Biology 17:1344-1357.
6. Czech, B. 2003b. Roll over, Adam Smith: the "new economy of nature" overlooks the origins of money. BioScience 53:180-181.
7. Daly, H. E. 1977. Steady-state economics. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
8. Daly, H. E. 1999. Editorial: the lurking inconsistency. Conservation Biology 13:693-694.
9. Ellison, K., and G. C. Daily. 2003. Making conservation profitable. Conservation in Practice 4:13-19.
10. Ferraro, P. J., and A. Kiss. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298:1718-1719.
11. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
12. Goldemberg, J. 1997. Leapfrogging strategies for developing countries. Pages 333-347 in Y. Kaya and K. Yokobori editors. Environment, energy, and economy: strategies for sustainability. U.N. University Press, Tokyo. Also available from http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu17ee/uu17ee0m.htm#17. %20leapfrogging%20strategies%20for%20developing%20countries (accessed June 2005).
13. Hajer, M. A. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
14. Haraway, D. J. 1994. A game of cat's cradle: science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 1:59-71.
15. Hughey, K. F. D., R. Cullen, and E. Moran. 2003. Integrating economics into priority setting and evaluation in conservation management. Conservation Biology 17:93-103.
16. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2000. Emissions scenarios: summary for policymakers. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/sres-e.pdf (accessed June 2005).
17. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1990. First assessment report: scientific assessment of climate change - report of working group I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
18. Jenkins, M., S. J. Scherr, and M. Inbar. 2004. Markets for biodiversity services: potential roles and challenges. Environment July/August:32-42.
19. Katoomba Group. 2005. About ecosystem marketplace. Katoomba Group, Washington, D.C. Available from http://ecosystemmarketplace.net/index.php (accessed June 2005).
20. Leopold, A. 1991. Conservation economics. Pages 193-202 in S. L. Flader and J. B. Callicott, editors. The river of the mother of God and other essays by Aldo Leopold. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
21. Lohmann, L. 2001. Democracy or carbocracy? Intellectual corruption and the future of the climate debate. Briefing 24. The Corner House, Dorset, United Kingdom.
22. Meadows, D., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens III. 1972. The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York.
23. Meadows, D., J. Randers, and D. L. Meadows. 2004. The limits to growth: a thirty year update. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, Vermont.
24. Miller, G. T. 2004. Living in the environment: principles, connections, and solutions. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California.
25. Mwandosya, M. J. 1996. Survival emissions: a perspective from the South on global climate change negotiations. DUP Limited and The Centre for Energy, Environment, Science and Technology, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
26. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2002. Implementing domestic tradable permits: recent developments and future challenges. OECD, Paris.
27. Rasker, R.,M. V. Martin, and R. L. Johnson. 1992. Economics: theory versus practice in wildlife management. Conservation Biology 6:338-349.
28. Rosales, J. 2004. The idea of social progress and emissions trading. Pages 135-163 in V. Grover, editor. Climate change: perspectives five years after Kyoto. Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire.
29. Sachs, W. 1999. Planet dialectics: explorations in environment and development. Witwaterstrand University Press, Johannesburg.
30. SCB (Society for Conservation Biology). 2005. Enhancing the impact of conservation science: the Society for Conservation Biology's Strategic Plan 2006-2010 (9 September 2005). SCB, Arlington, Virginia. Available from http://www.conbio.org/SCB/Information/StrategicPlan/2006/(accessed October 2005).
31. SCBNAS (Society of Conservation Biology, North America Section). 2004. The steady state economy as a sustainable alternative to economic growth. SCB, Arlington, Virginia. Available from http://www.conbio.org/SCB/Activities/ Sections/NAmerica/NAS-SCBPositionOnEconomicGrowth.cfm (accessed June 2005).
32. Shogren, J. F., et al. 1999. Why economics matters for endangered species protection. Conservation Biology 13:1257-1261.
33. Stier, S. C., and S. F. Siebert. 2002. The Kyoto Protocol: an opportunity for biodiversity restoration forestry. Conservation Biology 16: 575.
34. Stier, S. C., and S. F. Siebert. 2003. Tropical reforestation and deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Conservation Biology 17:5.
35. TWS (The Wildlife Society). 2004. Wildlife policy statement - economic growth. TWS, Bethesda, Maryland. Available from http://www.wildlife.org/policy/ index.cfm?tname=policystatements&statement =ps35 (accessed June 2005).
36. UNDSD (U.N. Division of Sustainable Development). 2005. Energy use per unit of GDP. UNDSD, New York. Available from http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/ index.html (accessed June 2005).
37. Woods Hole Research Center. 2004. The missing carbon sink. Wood Hole Research Center, Wood Hole, Massachusetts. Available from http://www.whrc.org/ carbon/missingc.htm (accessed August 2005).
38. Young, C. E. F. 2005. Financial mechanisms for conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology 19:756-761.