The effects of caffeine consumption on direct and indirect majority and minority influence

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1961-1979

  Martin, Pearl Y ^a   Martin, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746345855     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00089.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. James, J. E. (1991). Caffeine and Health. London, UK: Academic Press.
4. James, J. E. (1997). Understanding caffeine: A biobehavioral analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Kenemans, J. L., & Lorist, M. M. (1995). Caffeine and selective visual processing. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 52, 461-471.
6. Kerr, J. S., Sherwood, N., & Hindmarch, I. (1991). Separate and combined effects of the social drugs on psychomotor performance. Psychopharmacology, 104, 113-119.
7. Krosnick, J. A., Boninger, D. S., Chuang, Y. C., Berent, M. K., & Carnot, C. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.
8. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III. (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
9. Martin, P. Y., Laing, J., Martin, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Caffeine, cognition, and persuasion: Evidence for caffeine increasing the systematic processing of persuasive messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 160-182.
10. Martin, P. Y., & Marrington, S. (2005). Morningness-eveningness orientation, optimal time-of-day and attitude change: Evidence for the systematic processing of a persuasive communication. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 367-377.
11. Martin, R., Gardikiotis, A., & Hewstone, M. (2002). Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 645-665.
12. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001a). Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1: Group processes (pp. 209-234). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001b). Determinants and consequences of cognitive processes in majority and minority influence. In J. Forgas & K. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 315-330). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
14. Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2003). Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
15. Mintz, P. M., & Mills, J. (1971). Effects of arousal and information about its source upon attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 561-570.
16. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
17. rd ed., pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
18. Mucchi-Faina, A. (1994). Minority influence effects: Assimilation and differentiation. In S. Moscovici, A. Mucchi-Faina, & A. Maass (Eds.), Minority influence (pp. 115-133). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
19. Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
20. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
21. Nemeth, C. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes and judgements. Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.
22. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Raghunathan, R., & Trope, Y. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 510-525.
24. th ed.). St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby.
25. Rogers, P. J. (2000). Why we drink caffeine-containing beverages, and the equivalent benefits of regular caffeine intake for mood and cognitive performance. In T. H. Parliment, C. T. Ho, & P. Schierberle (Eds.), Caffeinated beverages: Health benefits, physiological effects, and chemistry. ACS symposium series no. 754 (pp. 37-45). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
26. Ruijter, J., Lorist, M. M., Snel, J., & DeRuiter, M. B. (2000). The influence of caffeine on sustained attention: An ERP study. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 66, 29-37.
27. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Kardes, F. R. (1988). The effects of physiological arousal on information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 379-385.
28. Van der Stelt, O. (1999). Caffeine and attention. In B. S. Gupta & U. Gupta (Eds.), Caffeine and behavior: Current views and research trends. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
29. Wall, A. M., McKee, S. A., & Hinson, R. E. (2000). Assessing variation in alcohol outcome expectancies across environmental context: An examination of the situational-specificity hypothesis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 367-375.
30. Zillman, D. (1978). Attribution and misattribution of excitatory reactions. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 335-368). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.