Isoyield analysis of barley cultivar trials in the Canadian prairies

Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Volumn 192, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 284-294

  Yang, R C ^a,b   Stanton, D ^a,c   Blade, S F ^a,d   Helm, J ^a   Spaner, D ^a,b   Wright, S ^a,e   Domitruk, D ^a,f  

^a ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c Pioneer Hi Bred Production Ltd   (Canada)

^d Carolyn House ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e Saskatchewan Agriculture Food and Rural Revitalization   (Canada)

^f GOVERNMENT OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Genotype environment interaction; Isoyield environments; Site stability

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BARLEY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTIVAR; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; PRAIRIE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YIELD;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 33746237556     PISSN: 09312250     EISSN: 1439037X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00209.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abou-El-Fittouh, H. A., J. O. Rawlings, and P. A. Miller, 1969: Classification of environments to control genotype by environment interaction with an application to cotton. Crop Sci. 9, 135-140.
2. Becker, H. C., and J. Leon, 1988: Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101, 1-23.
3. Bernardo, R., 2002: Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, MN.
4. Brown, K. D., M. E. Sorrells, and W. R. Coffman, 1983: A method for classification and evaluation of testing environments. Crop Sci. 23, 889-893.
5. Canola Council of Canada, 2003: Prairie Canola Variety Trials. Canola Digest Nov/Dec 2003 issue: 25-30. Available at http://www.canola-council.org/ growing_trials.html
6. Collaku, A., S. A. Harrison, P. L. Finney, and D. A. Van Sanford, 2002: Clustering of environments of southern soft red winter wheat region for milling and baking quality attributes. Crop Sci. 42, 58-63.
7. Crossa, J., and P. L. Cornelius, 1997: Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 37, 406-415.
8. DeLacy, I. H., R. L. Eisemann, and M. Cooper, 1990: The importance of genotype-by-environment interaction in regional variety trials. In: M. S. Kang, ed. Genotype-by-environment Interaction in Plant Breeding, pp. 287-300. Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
9. Eberhart, S. A., and W. A. Russell, 1966: Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6, 36-40.
10. Ecological Stratification Working Group, 1995: A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Cent. for Land and Biol. Resour. Res., Agric. and AgriFood Can., Ottawa, ON, and Ecozone Analysis Branch, State of Environ. Directorate of Environ. Can., Hull, QC.
11. Finlay, K. W., and G. N. Wilkinson, 1963: The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14, 742-754.
12. Gauch, H. G., and R. W. Zobel, 1996: AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: M. S. Kang, and H. G. Gauch, ed. Genotype-by-environment Interaction, pp. 1-40. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Ghaderi, A., E. H. Everson, and C. E. Cress, 1980: Classification of environments and genotypes in wheat. Crop Sci. 20, 707-710.
14. Helm, J., P. Juskiw, and T. Duggan, 2002: A new look at location yield data. Presentation at the North American Barley Researchers Workshop, Fargo, ND, September 22-25, 2002. Available at http:// www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/ $department/deptdocs.nsf/all/ fcd5590.
15. Horner, T. W., and K. J. Frey, 1957: Methods for determining natural areas for oat varieties based upon known environmental variables. Agron. J. 52, 396-399.
16. Hussein, M. A., A. Bjornstad, and A. H. Aastveit, 2000: SASG x ESTAB: A SAS program for computing genotype x environment stability statistics. Agron. J. 92, 454-459.
17. Lin, C. S., and G. Butler, 1990: Cluster analysis for analyzing two-way classification data. Agron. J. 82, 344-348.
18. Padbury, G., S. Waltman, J. Caprio, G. Coen, S. McGinn, D. Mortensen, G. Nielsen, and R. Sinclair, 2002: Agroecosystems and land resources of the northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 94, 251-261.
19. Perkins, J. M., and J. L. Jinks, 1968: Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339-356.
20. Piepho, H. P., 1999: Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron. J. 91, 154-160.
21. Russell, W. K., K. M. Eskridge, D. A. Travnicek, and F. R. Guillen-Portal, 2003: Clustering environments to minimize change in rank of cultivars. Crop Sci. 43, 858-864.
22. Sampson, D. R., and V. I. L. Souza Machado, 1974: Distribution of coefficients of variation in Canadian eastern cooperative spring cereal tests. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54, 817-820.
23. SAS Institute, 1999: SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8.0. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
24. Sokal, R. R., and C. D. Michener, 1958: A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. of Kansas Sci. Bull. 38, 1409-1438.
25. SPSS Inc, 2002: SPSS® 11.5 Syntax Reference Guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL.
26. Truberg, B., and M. Hühn, 2002: Contributions to the analysis of genotype x environment interactions: experimental results of the application and comparison of clustering techniques for the stratification of field test sites. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 188, 113-122.
27. Wright, A. J., 1971: The analysis and prediction of some two factor interactions in grass breeding. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 76, 301-306.
28. Yan, W., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlanics, 2000: Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 40, 597-605.
29. Yang, R.-C., S. F. Blade, J. Crossa, D. Stanton, and M. S. Bandara, 2005: Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Sci. 45, 106-113.
30. Yates, F., and W. G. Cochran, 1938: The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 28, 556-580.
31. Zentner, R. P., D. D. Wall, C. N. Nagy, E. G. Smith, D. L. Young, P. R. Miller, C. A. Campbell, B. G. McConkey, S. A. Brandt, G. P. Lafond, A. M. Johnston, and D. A. Derksen, 2002: Economics of crop diversification and soil tillage opportunities in the Canadian prairies. Agron. J. 94, 216-230.