Policy arena: NGOs in the United Nations system: Evaluating theoretical approaches

Journal of International Development

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 691-700

  Martens, Kerstin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Corporatism; Global civil society; Humanitarian NGOs; Intergovernmental organisations; United Nations

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 33746228048     PISSN: 09541748     EISSN: 10991328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jid.1303     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anheier H, Glasius M, Kaldor M. 2001. Introducing global civil society. In Global Civil Society, Anheier H, Glasius M, Kaldor M (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford; 3-22.
2. Chandler D. 2001. The road to military humanitarianism: how the human rights NGOs shaped a new humanitarian agenda. Human Rights Quarterly 23(3): 678-700.
3. Czada R. 1994. Konjunkturen des Korporatismus: Zur Geschichte eines Paradigmenwechsels in der Verbändeforschung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Special Issue: Staat und Verbände, Streek W (ed.) 25: 37-64.
4. della Porta D, Kriesi H. 1999. Social movements in a globalizing world: an introduction. In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D (eds). St. Martin's: Chippenham; 3-22.
5. Eising R, Kohler-Koch B. 1994. Inflation und Zerfaserung: Trends der Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Special Issue: Staat und Verbände, Streek W (ed.) 25: 175-206.
6. Glagow M, Schimank U. 1983. Korporatistische Verwaltung: Das Beispiel Entwicklungspolitik. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 24(3): 253-274.
7. Global Policy Forum. 2000. NGO Working Group on the Security Council - Information Statement (available online at: http://www.globalpolicy.org/ security/ngowkgrp/statements/current.htm [accessed 28 July 2004], paper dated December 2000).
8. Global Policy Forum. 2001. A Short History of the NGO Working Group on the Security Council (available online at: http://www.globalpolicy.org/ security/ngowkgrp/history.htm [accessed 28 July 2004], paper dated April 2001).
9. Global Policy Forum. 2005. Arria and other Special Meetings between NGOs and the Security Council Members (available online at: http:// www.globalpolicy.org/security/mtgsetc/brieindx.htm. [accessed 28 June 2005]).
10. Gorges MJ. 1996. Euro-Corporatism Interest Intermediation in the European Community. University Press of America: Lanham.
11. Hix S. 1999. The Political System of the European Union. St. Martin's: New York.
12. Jaeger G. 1982. Participation of non-governmental orgartisations in the activities of the United Nations high commissioner for refugees. In Pressure Groups in the Global System. The Transnational Relations of Issue-Oriented Non-Governmental Organisations, Wiletts P (ed). Frances Pinter: London; 171-178.
13. Joachim J. 2003. Framing issues and seizing opportunities: women's rights and the UN. International Studies Quarterly 47(2): 247-274.
14. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Cornell University Press: Ithaca/New York.
15. Lipschutz R. 1992. Reconstructing world politics: the emergence of global civil society. Millennium 21(3): 389-420.
16. Martens K. 2001. Non-governmental organisations as corporatist mediator? An analysis of NGOs in the UNESCO system. Global Society 15(4): 387-404.
17. Martens K. 2002. Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organisations. Voluntas 13(3): 271-285.
18. Offe C. 1981. The attribution of public status to interest groups: observations on the West German case. In Organizing Interests in West Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Tansformation of Politics, Berger SD (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 123-158.
19. Ottaway M. 2001. Corporatism goes global: international organisations, nongovernmental organisations networks, and transnational business. Global Governance 7(3): 265-292.
20. Passy F. 1999. Supranational political opportunities as a channel of globalization of political conflicts. The case of the rights of indigenous peoples. In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D (eds). St. Martin's: Chippenham; 148-169.
21. Paul J. 2003. The Arria Formula (available online at: http:// www.globalpolicy.org/security/mtgsetc/arria.htm [accessed 30 June 2005], paper dated October 2003).
22. Price R. 1998. Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines. International Organisation 52(3): 613-664.
23. Risse T, Sikkink K. 1999. The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: introduction. In the Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change, Risse T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 1-39.
24. Risse-Kappen T (ed). 1995a. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
25. Risse-Kappen T. 1995b. Bringing transnational relations back in: introduction. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institution, Risse-Kappen T (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 3-36.
26. Rucht D. 1999. The transnationalization of social movements: trends, causes, problems. In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, della Porta D, Kriesi H, Rucht D (eds). St. Martin's: Chippenham; 223-244.
27. Schmitter P. 1979. Still the century of corporatism? In Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation, Schmitter P, Lehmbruch G (eds). Sage: London; 7-52.
28. SCHR. 1999. SCHR Plan of Action 1999 (manuscript of the SCHR).
29. Smith J, Pagnucco R, Romeril W. 1994. Transnational social movement organisations in the global political arena. Voluntas 5(2): 121-154.
30. Smith J, Pagnucco R, Chatfield C. 1997. Social movements and world politics: a theoretical framework. In Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics. Solidarity Beyond the State, Smith J, Chatfield C, Pagnucco R (eds). Syracuse University Publication: Syracuse/NY; 59-80.
31. Traxler F, Schmitter PC. 1991. The emerging euro-polity and organized interest. European Journal of International Relations 1(2): 191-218.
32. Turner S. 1998. Global civil society. Anarchy and governance: assessing an emerging paradigm. Journal of Research 35(1): 25-42.
33. UN Doc. A/53/170. 1998. Arrangement and practices for the interaction of non-governmental organisations in all activities of the United Nations system. Report of the Secretary-General (10 July 1998).
34. UN Doc. A/58/817. 2004. We the peoples: civil society, the United Nations and global governance (11 June 2004).
35. Voelzkow H, Hilbert J, Heinze RG. 1987. Regieren dutch Verbände - am Beispiel der umweltschutzbezogenen Techniksteuerung. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 28(1): 80-100.
36. Wahl R 1997. Mythos und Realität internationaler Zivilgesellschaft. Zu den Perspektiven globaler Vernetzung von Nicht-Regierungs-Organisationen. In Vernetzt und verstrickt: Nicht-Regierungs-Organisationen als gesellschaftliche Produktivkraft, Altvater E, Brunnengräber A. Haake M (eds). Westfälisches Dampfboot: Münster; 293-314.
37. Wapner P. 1997. Governance in global civil society. In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, Young OR (ed). MIT Press: Cambridge; 65-84.