Specialized use of pollen vectors by Caesalpinia gilliesii, a legume species with brush-type flowers

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 579-592

  Moré, Marcela ^a   Sérsic, Alicia N ^a   Cocucci, Andrea A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Fabaceae; Long tongued hawkmoth pollination; Pollinator guild; Pterotribic pollen deposition; Sphingidae

Indexed keywords

FLOWER VISITING; LEGUME; MOTH; NECTAR; POLLEN; POLLINATION; SPECIALIZATION;

ARGENTINA; SOUTH AMERICA;

CAESALPINIA; CAESALPINIA GILLIESII; FABACEAE; SPHINGIDAE;

EID: 33746217934     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00644.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alexandersson B, Johnson SD. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 269: 631-636.
2. Baum DA. 1995. The comparative pollination and floral biology of baobabs (Adansonia - Bombacaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 322-348.
3. Breteler FJ. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). In: Crip MD, Doyle JJ, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 53-62.
4. Burkart A. 1936. Las especies Argentinas y Uruguayas del género Caesalpinia. Revista, Argentina de Agronomia, 3:67-112.
5. Cabrera AL. 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas Argentinas. Enciclopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería 1. Buenos Aires: Acmé.
6. Calviño A, Carrizo García C. 2005. Sexual dimorphism and gynoecium size variation in the andromonoecious shrub Caesalpinia gilliesii. Plant Biology 7: 195-202.
7. Cascante-Marín A. 1997. La familia Bombacaceae (Malvales) en Costa Rica. Brenesia 47-48: 17-36.
8. Cocucci AA, Galetto L, Sérsic AN. 1992. El síndrome floral de Caesalpinia gilliesii (Fabaceae - Caesalpinioideae). Darwiniana 31: 111-135.
9. Cruden RW, Hermann-Parker SM. 1979. Butterfly pollination of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, with observations on a psycho philous syndrome. Journal of Ecology 67: 155-168.
10. Dafni A, Eisikowitch D, Ivri Y. 1987. Nectar flow and pollinators' efficiency in two co-occurring species of Capparis (Capparaceae) in Israel. Plant Systematics and Evolution 157: 181-186.
11. Darwin C. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. London: Murray.
12. Eguiarte L, Martínez del Río C, Arita H. 1987. El néctar y el polen como recursos: el papel ecológico de los visitantes florales de Pseudobombax ellipticum (H.B.K.) Dugand. Biotropica 19: 74-82.
13. Eisikowitch D, Ivri Y, Dafni A. 1986. Reward partitioning in Capparis spp. along an ecological gradient. Oecologia 71: 47-50.
14. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Fortunato RH. 1986. Revisión del género Bauhinia (Cercideae, Caesalpinoidea, Fabaceae) para la Argentina. Darwiniana 27: 527-557.
16. Fry R, Waring P. 2001. A guide to moth traps and their use, 2nd edn. Brentwood: Cravitz Company.
17. Gómez SA. 1953. Las Caparidáceas Argentinas. Lilloa 26: 279-351.
18. Haber WA, Frankie GW. 1982. Pollination of Luehea (Tiliaceae) in Costa Rican deciduous forest. Ecology 63: 1740-1750.
19. Haber WA, Frankie GW. 1989. A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae. Biotropica 21: 155-172.
20. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. 1997. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 51: 45-53.
21. Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot: University of Colorado Press.
22. Killeen TJ, García E, Beck SG. 1993. Guía de árboles de Bolivia. La Paz: Herbario Nacional de Bolivia and Missouri Botanical Garden.
23. Kislev ME, Kraviz Z, Lorch J. 1972. A study of hawkmoth pollination by a palynological analysis of the proboscis. Israel Journal of Botany 21: 57-75.
24. Koptur S. 1983. Flowering phenology and floral biology of Inga (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Systematic Botany 8: 354-368.
25. Legname PR. 1972. Las Caparidáceas Chaqueñas. Notas preliminares para la flora Chaqueña (Formosa, Chaco y Santiago del Estero). INTA Ministerio de Agricultura 3: 15-25.
26. Maad J. 2000. Phenotypic selections in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54: 112-123.
27. Meyer T. 1969. Árboles nuevos o notables del noroeste argentine. Lilloa 33: 6-9.
28. Moré M, Cocucci AA, Sérsic AN, Hempel de Ibarra N, Flügge A, Vorobyev M, Warrant E, Kelber A. 2003. Colours of nocturnal hawkmoth-pollinated flowers. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. 38: 57.
29. Moré M, Kitching IJ, Cocucci AA. 2005. Sphingidae: hawkmoths of Argentina. Esfíngidos de Argentina. Buenos Aires: C. Sharp.
30. Nilsson LA. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 334: 147-149.
31. Nilsson LA, Jonsson L, Ralison L, Randrianjohany E. 1987. Angraecoid orchids and hawkmoths in central Madagascar: Specialized pollination systems and generalist foragers. Biotropica 19: 310-318.
32. Payens JPDW. 1967. A monograph of the genus Barringtonia (Lecythidaceae). Blumea 15: 157-263.
33. Prance GT. 1976. Caryocaraceae, Part VI. Family 120. Flora of Panama. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 63: 541-546.
34. Prance GT, Silva MF. 1973. Caryocaraceae. Flora Neotropica. New York Botanical Garden 12: 1-75.
35. Quinn FC, Cowley KJ, Barlow BA, Thiele KR. 1992. New names and combinations for some Melaleuca (Myrtaceae) species and subspecies from the south-west of Western Australia considered rare or threatened. Nuytsia 8: 333-350.
36. Roqueiro M, Moré M, Sérsic AN, Cocucci AA. 2001a. Gremios de Esfingidos en el Norte de Argentina. V. Congreso Latinoamericano de Ecología, S.S. de Jujuy, Argentina.
37. Roqueiro M, Sérsic AN, Cocucci AA. 2001b. Estudios sobre esfingofilia en Argentina subtropical. I. Reunión Binacional de Ecología Argentino-Chilena, Bariloche, Argentina.
38. Silberbauer-Gottsberger I, Gottsberger G. 1975. Über sphingophile angiospermen Brasiliens. Plant Systematics and Evolution 123: 157-184.
39. Simpson BB, Miao BM. 1997. The circumscription of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae) and its allies using morphological and cpDNA restriction site data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 205: 157-178.
40. Singer RB, Cocucci AA. 1997. Eye attached hemipollinaria in the hawkmoth and settling moth pollination of Habenaria (Orchidaceae): a study on functional morphology in 5 species from subtropical South America. Botanica Acta 110: 328-337.
41. Sokal RR, Rohlf JF. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. New York: WH. Freeman.
42. Stevens WD, Ulloa CU, Pool A, Montiel OM. 2001. Flora de Nicaragua. Monographs in Systematics Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 1-943.
43. Thompson JN. 1999. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. American Naturalist 153: S1-S14.
44. Todsen TK. 1999. A new endemic species of Mentzelia Sect. Bartonia (Loasaceae) from New Mexico. Sida 18: 819-822.
45. Troncoso NS. 1987. Capparaceae. In: Troncoso NS, Bacigalupo NM, eds. Flora ilustrada de entre ríos, colección científica del Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria 4: 344-357.
46. Ulibarri EA, Gómez Sosa EV, Cialdella AM, Fortunato RH, Bazzano D. 2002. Leguminosas nativas y exóticas. Buenos Aires: C. Sharp.
47. Vogel S. 1954. Blütenbiologische typen als elemente der sippengliederung. Jena: Fischer.