The circumscription of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae) and its allies using morphological and cpDNA restriction site data

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 205, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 157-178

  Simpson, Beryl B ^a   Miao, Bo Mao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b PLANT BIOLOGY DIVISION   (United States)

Author keywords

Caesalpinia. Systematics; Caesalpinioideae; Cladistics; CpDNA; Fabaceae; Hoffmannseggia; neotropics

Indexed keywords

CAESALPINIA; CAESALPINIEAE; CAESALPINIOIDEAE; FABACEAE; HOFFMANNSEGGIA; POMARIA;

EID: 0030989868     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01464402     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BARRETT, M., DONOGHUE, M. J., SOBER, E., 1991: Against consensus. - Syst. Zool. 40: 486-493.
2. BENTHAM, G., HOOKER, J. D., 1865: Eucaesalpinieae. - Genera Plantarum 1: 565-566. - London: Lovell & Reeve.
3. BRITTON, N. L., ROSE, J. N., 1930: Caesalpiniaceae. - In: North American Flora, 23 pp. 201-349. - New York: New York Botanical Garden.
4. BRUMMITT, R. K., Ross, J. H., 1974: The African species of Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). - Kew Bull. 29: 415-424.
5. BULL, J. J., HUELSENBECK, J. P., CUNNINGHAM, C. W., SWOFFORD, D. L., WADDELL, P. J., 1993: Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. - Syst. Biol. 42: 384-397.
6. BURKART, A., 1936: Las especies argentinas y uruguayas del género Caesalpinia. - Revista Argent. Agron. 3: 67-124.
7. CANDOLLE, A. P. DE, 1825: Prodromus 2, pp. 481-483. - Paris: Treuttel.
8. CAVANILLES, J., 1798: I cones et descriptiones plantarum, 4. -Madrid: Typographia regia.
9. _ 1799: Icones et descriptiones plantarum, 5. - Madrid: Typographia regia.
10. CHIPPENDALE, P. T., WIENS, J. J., 1994: Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. - Syst. Biol. 43: 278-287.
11. CORRELL, D. S., JOHNSTON, M. C., 1970: Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. - Renner, Texas: Texas Research Foundation.
12. COCUCCI, A., GALETTO, L., SERSIC, A., 1992: El sindrome de Caesalpinia gilliesii (Fabaceae-Caesalpinioideae). - Darwiniana 31: 111-135.
13. DEBRY, R. W., SLADE, N. A., 1985: Cladistic analysis of restriction endonuclease cleavage maps within a maximum likelihood framework. - Syst. Zool. 34: 21-34.
14. DONOGHUE, M. J., SANDERSON, M. J., 1992: The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. - In SOLTIS, D. E., SOLTIS, P. S., DOYLE, J. J., (Eds): Plant molecular systematics, pp. 340-368. - New York: Chapman & Hall.
15. DOYLE, J. J., DOYLE, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. - Phytochem. Bull. Bot. Soc. Amer. 19: 11-15.
16. FARRIS, J. S., 1970: Methods for computing Wagner trees. - Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
17. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. - Evolution 39: 783-791.
18. FISHER, E. M., 1892: Revision of the North American species of Hoffmannseggia. - Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 1: 143-150.
19. _ 1893: The genus Caesalpinia. - Bot. Gaz. 18: 121-123.
20. HILLIS, D., 1995: Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. - Syst. Biol. 44: 3-16.
21. HOLSINGER, K. E., JANSEN, R. J., 1993: Phylogenetic analysis of restriction site data. -Methods Enzymol. 224: 439-455.
22. ISELY, D., 1975: Leguminosae of the United States: II. subfamily Caesalpinioideae. - Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 25: 1-223.
23. JANSEN, R. K., PALMER, J. D., 1987a: Chloroplast DNA from lettuce and Barnadesia (Asteraceae): structure, gene localization, and characterization of a large inversion. -Curr. Genet. 11: 553-564.
24. _ 1987b: A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 5818-5822.
25. KLUGE, A. G., 1989: A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). - Syst. Zool. 38: 7-25.
26. LAVIN, M., LUCKOW, M., 1993: Origins and relationships of tropical North America in the context of the boreotropics hypothesis. - Amer. J. Bot. 80: 1-14.
27. LERSTEN, N. R., CURTIS, J. D., 1994: Leaf anatomy in Caesalpinia and Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) with an emphasis on secretory structures. - Pl. Syst. Evol. 192: 231-255.
28. _ 1995: Two foliar idioblasts of taxonomic significance in Cercidium and Parkinsonia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). - Amer. J. Bot. 82: 565-570.
29. LEWIS, G. P., 1994: Systematic studies in neotropical Caesalpinia L. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). - Ph.D. Thesis, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland.
30. _ SCHRIRE, B. D., 1994: A reappraisal of the Caesalpinia group (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) using a phylogenetic analysis. - In CRISP, M. D., DOYLE, J. J., (Eds): Advances in legume systematics 7: phylogeny, pp. 41-52. - Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
31. LINNAEUS, C., 1753: Species plantarum. - Stockholm: Salvius.
32. MIYAMOTO, M. M., 1985: Consensus cladograms and general classifications. - Cladistics 1:186-189.
33. OLMSTEAD, R. G., PALMER, J. D., 1992: A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Solanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution.-Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700-722.
34. OWENS, S. J., 1990: The morphology of the wet, non-papillate (WN) stigma form in the tribe Caesalpinieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). - Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104:293-302.
35. _ LEWIS, G. P., 1995: Stigma morphology in the Leguminosae: the wet, papillate (WP) stigma in Caesalpinioideae. - Kew Bull. 51: 119-131.
36. PALMER, J. D., STEIN, D. B., 1986: Conservation of chloroplast genome structure among vascular plants. - Curr. Genet. 10:823-833.
37. POLHILL, R. M., VIDAL, J. E., 1981: Caesalpinieae. - In POLHILL, R. M., RAVEN, P. H., (Eds):Advances in legume systematics 1, pp. 81-95. - Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
38. QUEIROZ, A. DE, 1993: For consensus (sometimes). - Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
39. REICHE, K., 1897: Estudios críticos sobre la flora de Chile. - Anales Univ. Chile 47: 289-313.
40. ROBERSTON, K. R., LEE, Y.-T., 1976: The genera of Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) in Southeastern United States. - J. Arnold Arbor. 57: 1-53.
41. SHAFFER, H. B., CLARK, J. M., KRAUS, F., 1991: When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). - Syst. Zool. 40: 284-303.
42. SWOFFORD, D. L., 1993: PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1.-Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
43. TAUBERT, P., 1894: Caesalpinioideae. - In ENGLER, A., PRANTL, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, III (3), pp. 125-184. - Leipzig: Engelmann.
44. TORREY, J., GRAY, A., 1840: A Flora of North America 1: 392-393. - New York: Wiley & Putnam.
45. ULIBARRI, E., 1979: Las especies argentinas del género Hoffmannseggia CÁV. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). - Darwiniana 22: 135-158.
46. _ 1987: Notas sobre Caesalpinia y Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae). - Darwiniana 28: 231-235.
47. URBAN, I., 1900: Symbolae Antillanae, 2. - Leipzig: Borntraeger.
48. VIDAL, J. E., THOL, S. H., 1976: Révision des Caesalpinia asiatiques. - Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Sér. 3, Bot. 27: 69-135.
49. VOGEL, T., 1837: De Caesalpinieis Brasiliae. - Linnaea 11: 401-408.
50. WIGGINS, I. L., 1980: Flora of Baja California. - Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.