Incorporating spatial and temporal information for urban drainage model calibration: An approach using preference ordering genetic algorithm

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1168-1181

  Khu, S T ^a   di Pierro, F ^a   Savic D ^a   Djordjevic S ^a   Walters, G A ^a  

^a Mathematics Research Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automatic calibration; Genetic algorithms; Multi objectives; Preference ordering; Rainfall runoff; Spatial information; Temporal information

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; RAIN; RUNOFF; STORM SEWERS;

AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHMS; PREFERENCE ORDERING;

DRAINAGE;

DRAINAGE; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; RAIN; RUNOFF; STORM SEWERS;

GENETIC ALGORITHM; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; OPTIMIZATION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN DRAINAGE;

EID: 33746211709     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ASCE Task Committee, Hydrology handbook. ASCE Manuals and Reports on engineering Practice No. 28, New York, 1996.
2. Baffaut C., and Delleur J.W. Expert system for calibrating SWMM. J Water Resour Plann Manage, ASCE 115 3 (1988) 278-298
3. Bergstrom S., Linstrom G., and Pettersson A. Multi-variable parameter estimation to increase confidence in hydrological modeling. Hydrol Process 16 (2002) 413-421
4. Beven K. Prophesy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modeling. Adv Water Resour 16 (1993) 41-51
5. Beven K. On modeling as collective intelligence. Hydrol Process 15 (2001) 2205-2207
6. Brazil LE, Krajewski WF. Optimisation of complex hydrologic models using random search methods. In: Proc engineering hydrology conf, Hydraulic Division, ASCE, Williamsburg, VA, 1987. p. 726-31.
7. Cai X., McKinney D.C., and Lasdon L.S. Solving nonlinear water management models using a combined genetic algorithm and linear programming approach. Adv Water Resour 24 6 (2001) 667-676
8. Clemens FHLR. Hydrodynamic models in urban drainage: application and calibration. Doctoral dissertation, DUP Science, Delft, 2001.
9. Cheng C.T., Ou C.P., and Chau K.W. Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration. J Hydrol 268 1-4 (2002) 72-86
10. Cooper V.A., Nguyen V.T.V., and Nicell J.A. Evaluation of global optimization methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Sci Technol 36 5 (1997) 53-60
11. Das I. A preference ordering among various Pareto optimal alternatives. Struct Opt 18 1 (1998)
12. Deb K., Agrawal S., Pratap A., and Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6 2 (2002) 182-197
13. Djordjević S, Prodanović D, Despotović J, Petrović J, Šotić A. A preliminary design of Kumodraz urban drainage system-first phase. In: 3rd Int conf on hydroinformatics, Copenhagen, 1998.
14. Duan Q.Y., Sorooshian S., and Gupta V. Effective and efficient global optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 28 4 (1992) 1015-1031
15. Fonseca C.M., and Fleming P.J. Multiobjective optimisation. Handbook of evolutionary computation (1995), IOP Publishing Ltd. and Oxford University Press
16. Franchini M., Galeati G., and Berra S. Global optimization techniques for the calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Sci J 43 3 (1998) 443-458
17. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation and machine learning (1989), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
18. Goldberg D.E., and Deb K. A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. Foundations of genetic algorithms (1991), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA 69-93
19. Green W.G., and Ampt G.A. Studies on soil physics 1. The flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4 1 (1911)
20. Green I.R.A., and Stephenson D. Criteria for comparison of single event models. Hydrol Sci J 31 3 (1986) 395-411
21. Gupta V.K., and Sorooshian S. The automatic calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative-based optimisation algorithms. Water Resour Res 21 4 (1985) 473-485
22. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., and Yapo P.O. Toward improved calibration of hydrological models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 34 4 (1998) 751-763
23. Holland J.H. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems (1975), Ann Arbor Science Press, Ann Arbor, MI
24. Ibrahim Y., and Liong S.Y. A method of estimating optimal catchment model parameters. Water Resour Res 29 9 (1993) 3049-3058
25. Isabel D., and Villeneuve J.P. Importance of the convergence criterion in the automatic calibration of hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 22 10 (1986) 1367-1370
26. James WRC, Wan B, James W. Implementation in PCSWMM using Genetic Algorithms for auto calibration and design-optimization. In: Proc, 9th int conf on urban drainage, Portland, USA. 2002.
27. Johnston P.R., and Pilgrim D.H. Parameter optimisation for watershed models. Water Resour Res 12 3 (1976) 477-486
28. Kavetski D., Franks S.W., and Kuczera G. Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling. In: Duan Q., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., Rousseau A.N., and Turcotte R. (Eds). Calibration of watershed models (2003), AGU, Washington, DC 49-68
29. Khadam I.M., and Kaluarachchi J.J. Use of soft information to describe the relative uncertainty of calibration data in hydrologic models. Water Resour Res 40 (2004) W11505 10.1029/2003WR002939
30. Khu S.T., and Madsen H. Multi-objective calibration with Pareto preference ordering. An application to rainfall-runoff model calibration. Water Resour Res 41 3 (2005) 10.1029/2004WR003041
31. Kuczera G., and Mroczkowski M. Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multi-response data. Water Resour Res 35 (1998) 1481-1489
32. Kuczera G., and Parent E. Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm. J Hydrol 211 (1998) 69-85
33. Linsley R.K., Kohler M.A., and Paulhus J.I.H. Applied hydrology (1949), McGraw-Hill, London
34. Liong S.Y., Chan W.T., and ShreeRam J. Peak-flow forecasting with genetic algorithms and SWMM. J Hydr Eng, ASCE 121 8 (1995) 613-617
35. Liong S.Y., ShreeRam J., and Ibrahim Y. Catchment calibration using fractional-factorial and central-composite-designs-based response surface. J Hydr Eng, ASCE 121 6 (1995) 507-510
36. Liong S.Y., Khu S.T., and Chan W.T. Derivation of Pareto front with genetic algorithm and neural network. J Hydrol Eng, ASCE 6 1 (2001) 52-61
37. Madsen H, Khu ST. Parameter estimation in hydrological modelling using multi-objective optimization. In: Proc 5th int conf on hydroinformatics, Cardiff, UK, 2002.
38. Mroczkowski M., Raper G.P., and Kuczera G. The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models. Water Resour Res 33 10 (1997) 2325-2335
39. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part 1-a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10 3 (1970) 282-290
40. Parker M, Savic DA, Walters GA, Kapelan Z. SEWERNET: a genetic algorithm application for optimizing urban drainage systems. In: Int conf on urban drainage via Internet, 2000. Available from: http://www.dhi.cz/ICUDI.
41. Petrović J. Inventory of rainfall-runoff measurement data on Miljakovac: experimental catchment in the period 1984-1993. Internal Report, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade (in Serbo-Croatian), 1994.
42. di Pierro F, Khu ST, Savic DA. An investigation of preference order ranking scheme for multiple objective evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans Evol Comput, under review.
43. di Pierro F, Khu ST, Djordjević S, Savić DA. A new genetic algorithm to effectively solve highly multi-objective problems: POGA. Internal Report, School of Engineering, Computer Sciences and Mathematics, Exeter, 2004.
44. Ponce V.M., and Yevjevich V. Muskingum-Cunge method with variable parameters. J Hydraul Div 104 12 (1978)
45. Radojković M, Maksimović Č. Development, testing and application of Belgrade urban drainage model. In: 3rd ICUD, vol. 4, Göteborg, 1984.
46. Rauch W., and Harremoes P. On the potential of genetic algorithms in urban drainage modeling. Urban Water 1 (1999) 79-89
47. Reed P., Minsker B.S., and Goldberg D.E. Simplifying multi-objective optimization: an automated design methodology for the nondominated sorted genetic algorithm II. Water Resour Res 39 7 (2003) 1196 10.1029/2002WR001483
48. Samanta S., and MacKay D.S. Flexible automated parameterisation of hydrologic models using fuzzy logic. Water Resour Res 39 1 (2003) 1009 10.1029/2002WR001349
49. Savenije H.H.G. Equifinality, a blessing in disguise. Hydrol Process 15 (2001) 2835-2838
50. Savic D., and Walters G. Genetic algorithms for the least-cost design of water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plann Manage ASCE 123 2 (1997)
51. Seibert J., and McDonnell J.J. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: use of soft information for multi-criteria model calibration. Water Resour Res 38 11 (2002) 1241 10.1029/2001WR000978
52. Seibert J., Uhlenbrook S., Leibundgut C., and Halldin S. Multiscale calibration and validation of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Phys Chem Earth, Part B: Hydrol Oceans Atmos 25 1 (2000) 59-64
53. Vrugt J.A., Gupta H.V., Bouten W., and Sorooshian S. A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 39 8 (2003) 1201 10.1029/2002WR001642
54. Yapo P.O., Gupta H.V., and Sorooshian S. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J Hydrol 204 1-4 (1998) 83-97
55. Zitzler E., and Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3 4 (1999) 257-271