Deduction with euler circles: Diagrams that hurt

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4045 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 199-203

  Calvillo, Dustin P ^a   DeLeeuw, Krista ^a   Revlin, Russell ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SCIENCE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DRAWING CONCLUSIONS; ELDERLY RETIRED PEOPLE; EULER CIRCLES; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33746210309     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11783183_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Calvillo, D.P. & Revlin, R. (2005). The role of similarity in deductive categorical inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Special Issue: Memory strength and recency judgments, 12, 938-944.
2. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W. and Harman, H. H. (1976) Kit of factorreferencedcognitivetests, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
3. Evans, J. St.B T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human Reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Evans, J. St. B. T (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Evans, J.St. B.T., Barston, J.L. & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295-306
6. Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking, Psychological Review,69, 366-378.
7. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of lanuage,inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Johnson-Laird, P.N. & Byrne, R.M.J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
9. Klauer, K.C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On the belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107, 852-884.
10. Newell, A. 1981. Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: The problem space as a fundamental category. In R. Nickerson (Ed). Attention and Performance. Vol.8. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Revlin, R. & Leirer, V.O. (1978). The effects of personal biases on syllogistic reasoning: Rational decisions from personalized representations. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer (Eds.), Human reasoning. Washington, DC: Winston.
12. Revlin, R., Leirer, V.O, Yopp, H. & Yopp, R. (1980). The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: The influence of knowledge on logic. Memory & Cognition, 8, 584-592.
13. Revlis, R. (1975). Two models of syllogistic reasoning: Feature selection and conversion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 180-195.
14. Rips, L. (1994). The Psychology of Proof. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Rizzo, A. & Palmonari, M. (2005). The mediating role of artifacts in deductive reasoning. Paper Presented at the 2005 Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.
16. Salthouse, T.A. & Mitchell, D.R. (1990). Effects of age and naturally occurring experience on spatial visualization performance. Developmental Psychology, 26, 845-854.
17. Sloman, S. A. (1998). Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 1-33.
18. Wilkins, M.C. (1928). The effect of changed material on the ability to do formal syllogistic reasoning. Archives of Psychology, 102, 1-83.