Killing for knowledge

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 17-40

  Zamir, Tzachi ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION; ANIMAL RIGHTS; ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PHILOSOPHY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VALUE OF LIFE;

EID: 33746192368     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00318.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J. Hampson, ‘Legislation: a practical solution to the vivisection dilemma?’ in N. A. Rupke (ed.) Vivisection in Historical Perspective (London: Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 314–339
2. R. Preece & L. Chamberlain, Animal Welfare & Human Values (Ontario: Wilfried Laurier University Press, 1995 [1993]), Ch. 6.
3. J. Webster, Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden, (Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1995), p. 233.
4. A. R. Morrison, ‘Ethical principles: guiding the use of animals in research’, The American Biology Teacher Feb, 65, 2 (2003): 105–108, 106.
5. R. D. Ryder’s Victims of Science: The Use of Animals in Research (London: The National Anti-Vivisection Society Limited, 1983 [1975]) p. 5
6. P. Cavalieri, The Animal Question: Why Nonhuman Animals Deserve Human Rights, C. Woollard trans (New York: Oxford UP, 2001), Ch. 4.
7. S. F. Sapontzis ‘On justifying the exploitation of animal research’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (1988): 177–96.
8. R. C. Frey, ‘Vivisection, morals and medicine’, Journal of Medical Ethics 9, 2 (1983): 94–97.
9. H. LaFollette and N. Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation (London: Routledge, 1996), pp. 251–2
10. R. B. White, ‘Contested terrain: beastly questions’, The Hastings Center Report, Mar 19, 2 (1989): 39–40, 39.
11. B. Steinbock, ‘Speciesism and the idea of equality’, Philosophy (1978): 247–256, 253–4.
12. J. H. Botting & A. R. Morrison, ‘Animal research is vital to medicine’, Scientific American, Feb, 276, 2 (1997): 67–9.
13. C. K. Fink, ‘Animal experimentation and the argument from limited resources’, Between the Species, Spring (1991): 90–95.
14. C. R. Greek and J. S. Greek, Sacred Cows and Solden Geese: the Human Cost of Experimenting on Animals (London: Continuum, 2000), chaps. 8–10.
15. M. Mukerjee, ‘Trends in animal research’, Scientific American Feb, 276, 2 (1997): 70–77.
16. S. Godlovitch, ‘Forbidding nasty knowledge: on the use of ill-gotten information’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 14, 1 (1997): 1–18.