Ethical principles guiding the use of animals in research

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 105-108

  Morrison, Adrian R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037292421     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4451448     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Botting, J. & Morrison, A.R. (1997). Animal research is vital to medicine. Scientific American, February, 83-85.
2. Conniff, R. (1990). Fuzzy-wuzzy thinking about animal rights. Audubon Magazine, 121-133.
3. Feinberg, J. (1978). Human duties and animal rights. In R.K. Morris & M.W. Fox (Eds.), On the Fifth Day: Animal Rights and Human Ethics (pp. 45-69). Washington, DC: Acropolis Books.
4. Leader, R.W. & Stark, D. (1987). The importance of animals in biomedical research. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 30, 470-485.
5. Morrison, A.R. (1993). Biomedical research and the animal rights movement: a contrast in values. The American Biology Teacher, 54, 134-136.
6. Morrison, A.R. (1999). A scientist at work. The American Biology Teacher, 61, 496-502.
7. Morrison, A.R. (2001a). Making choices in the laboratory. In E. Paul & J. Paul (Eds.), Why Animal Experimentation Matters: the Use of Animals in Medical Research (pp, 49-70). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
8. Morrison, A.R. (2001b). A scientist's perspective on the ethics of using animals in behavioral research. In J.B. Overmeir & M.E. Carroll (Eds.), Animal Research and Human Health: Advancing Human Welfare Through Behavioral Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, In Press.
9. Nicoll, C.S. & Russell, S.M. (1992). Animal rights, animal research, and human obligations. Molecular Cellular Neuroscience, 3, 271-277.
10. O'Hara, M. (1941). My Friend Flicka, 7th Impression. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
11. Regan, T. (1983). The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: The University of California.
12. Regan, T. & Singer, P. (1985). The dog in the lifeboat: an exchange. The New York Review of Books, April 25, 56-57.
13. Russell, S.M. & Nicoll, C.S. (1996). A dissection of the chapter 'Tools for Research' in Peter Singer's "Animal Liberation." Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 211, 109-154.
14. Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation, 1st ed. New York: The New York Review.
15. Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Singer, P. (1994). Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
17. Stell, L.K. (1995). The blessings of injustice: animals and the right to accept medical treatment. Between the Species, 11, 42-53.
18. Tannenbaum, J. (1995). Veterinary Ethics: Animal Welfare, Client Relations, Competition, and Collegiality. St. Louis: Mosby.
19. Tannenbaum, J. (1998). Rights, Welfare and Protection: What's in a Name? Scientists Center for Animal Welfare meeting, San Antonio, Texas, December.
20. Vance, R.P. (1992). An introduction to the philosophical presuppositions of the animal liberation/rights movement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1715-1719.
21. Weigel, G. (1995). Are humans special? Review of "Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Traditional Ethics" by Peter Singer, The Washington Post - Book World, March 26, 9-10.