Referral and attendance at a specialist antenatal clinic: Qualitative study of women's views

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 113, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 909-913

  Jackson, C J ^a   Bosio, P ^a   Habiba, M ^a   Waugh, J ^a   Kamal, P ^a   Dixon Woods, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antenatal clinic; Qualitative; Women's views

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CENTER; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION, PREGNANCY-INDUCED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL CARE; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 33746175765     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01016.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, Baker P, Bradley J, Cooper C, et al. The preeclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ 2005;330:576-80.
2. Spurgeon P, Hicks C, Barwell F. Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care. Midwifery 2001;17:123-32.
3. Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Waldenstrom U. Number of antenatal visits and women's opinion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:248-54.
4. Clement S, Sikorski J, Wilson J, Das S, Smeeton N. Women's satisfaction with traditional and reduced antenatal visit schedules. Midwifery 1996;12:120-8.
5. Jewell D, Sharp D, Sanders J, Peters TJ. A randomised controlled trial of flexibility in routine antenatal care. BJOG 2000;107:1241-7.
6. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1967.
7. Scott S, Prior L, Wood F, Gray J. Repositioning the patient: the implications of being 'at risk' Soc Sci Med 2005;6:869-1879.
8. Forss A, Tishelman C, Widmark C, Sachs L. Women's experiences of cervical cellular changes: an unintentional transition from health to liminality? Sociol Health Illn 2004;26:306-25.
9. Stahl A, Hundley V. Risk and risk assessment in pregnancy - so we scare because we care? Midwifery 2003;19:298-309.
10. Schutz A. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
11. Department of Health. Changing Childbirth, Part 1: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO, 1993.