Antenatal, delivery and postnatal comparisons of maternal satisfaction with two pilot Changing Childbirth schemes compared with a traditional model of care

Midwifery

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 123-132

  Spurgeon, Peter ^a   Hicks, Carolyn ^a   Barwell, Fred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DELIVERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MODEL; MOTHER; NURSE MIDWIFE; NURSING; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; POSTNATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; ENGLAND; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, NURSING; MOTHERS; NURSE MIDWIVES; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING, TEAM; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTNATAL CARE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRIMARY NURSING CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0035377612     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/midw.2001.0255     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allen I, Dowling S, Williams S 1997 A leading role for Midwives? Policy Studies Institute, London
2. Barber T 1998 Stress and the management of change. Royal College of Midwives' Journal 1(1): 26-27
3. Battersby S, Thomson A 1997 Community midwives' and general practitioners' perspectives of ante-natal care in the community. Midwifery 13(2): 92-99
4. Beake S, McCourt C, Page L et al. 1998 The use of clinical audit in evaluating maternity services reform: a critical reflection. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4(1): 75-83
5. Bradshaw MG, Bradshaw PL 1997 Changing Childbirth - the midwifery manager's tale. Journal of Nursing Management 5(3): 143-149
6. Brown S, Lumley J 1998 Changing Childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 105(12): 1340-1341
7. Campbell R, Macfarlane A, Cavenagh S 1991 Choice and chance in low-risk maternity care: GP obstetrics back on the agenda. British Medical Journal 303: 1487-1488
8. Carter Y 1995 Changing Childbirth: a challenge for GPs. British Journal of Midwifery 3(4): 228-230
9. Department of Health 1993 Changing Childbirth, Part 1: Report of the expert maternity group. HMSO, London
10. Fellowes D, Horsley A, Rochefort J 1999 Changing practice: is continuity of carer a top priority for all women? British Journal of Midwifery 7(1): 36-40
11. Fenwick N, Morgan M, McKenzie C et al. 1998 General practitioners' attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices. British Journal of General Practice 48(432): 1395-1398
12. Festinger L 1957 A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row, Peterson, New York
13. Green JM, Renfrew M, Curtis P 2000 Continuity of carer: what matters to women? A review of the evidence. Midwifery 16: 186-196
14. Hall J 1996 Room for improvement. . .pay, resources, Changing Childbirth. Nursing Times 92(28): 10-16
15. Page L, McCourt C, Beake S et al. 1999 Clinical interventions and outcomes of one-to-one midwifery practice. Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(3): 243-248
16. Porter M, Macintyre S 1984 What is, must be best: a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Social Science and Medicine 19(11): 1197-2000
17. Ratcliffe J, Ryan M, Tucker J 1996 Family doctor/midwife-led antenatal care is cheaper that obstetric-led care in low-risk pregnant women.
18. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 1(3): 135-140
19. Sandall J 1997 Choice, continuity and control: changing midwifery, towards a sociological perspective. Midwifery 11: 201-209
20. Shields N, Turnbull D, Reid M et al. 1998 Satisfaction with midwife-managed care in different time periods: a randomised controlled trial of 1299 women. Midwifery 14: 85-93