A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs

Experimental Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 237-251

  Berninghaus, Siegfried K ^a   Ehrhart, Karl Martin ^a   Ott, Marion ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Nash networks; Network formation; Real time experiments

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746150417     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-006-9125-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bala, V., & Goyal, S. (2000). A non-cooperative model of network formation. Econometrica, 68(5), 1181-1229
2. Berninghaus, S. K., & Ehrhart, K.-M. (1998). Time horizon and equilibrium selection in tacit coordination games: experimental results. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 231-248
3. Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., & Keser, C. (1999). Continuous-time strategy selection in linear population games. Experimental Economics, 2, 41-57
4. Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., & Ott, M. (2005). A network experiment in continuous time: The influence of link costs. SFB504 Discussion Paper Series No. 05-02, University of Mannheim. *http://www.sfb504.uni- mannheim.de/publications/dp05-02.pdf
5. Berninghaus, S. K., Ehrhart, K.-M., Ott, M., & Vogt, B. (2004). Searching for "stars" - recent experimental results on network formation -. SFB504 Discussion Paper Series No. 04-34, University of Mannheim. *http://www.sfb504.uni-mannheim.de/publications/dp04-34.pdf
6. Callander, S., & Plott, C. R. (2005). Principles of network development and evolution: an experimental study. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1469-1495
7. Chmura, T., & Pitz, T. (2006). Successful strategies in repeated minority games. Physica A, 363, 477-480
8. Deck, C., & Johnson, C. (2004). Link bidding in laboratory networks. Review of Economic Design, 8, 359-372
9. Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2003). It's all about connections: evidence on network formation. IEW Working paper No. 146, University of Zürich
10. Friedkin, N. E. (1983). Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Social Forces, 62, 54-77
11. Goeree, J. K., Riedl, A., & Ule, A. (2005). In search of stars: network formation among heterogeneous agents. Working paper
12. Goyal, S. (2005). Learning in networks. In G. Demange and M. Wooders (Eds.), Group formation in economics; networks, clubs and coalitions, chapter 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
13. Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition
14. Jackson, M. O. (2005). A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency. In G. Demange and M. Wooders (eds.), Group formation in economics; networks, clubs and coalitions, chapter 4. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kosfeld, M. (2004). Economic networks in the laboratory: A survey. Review of Network Economics, 3, 20-41
16. McBride, M. (2006). Imperfect monitoring in communication networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 126, 97-119
17. Oberschelp, W. (1967). Kombinatorische Anzahlbestimmungen in Relationen. Mathematische Annalen, 174, 53-78
18. Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press
19. Rubel, P. G., & Rosman, A. (1978). Your Own Pigs You May Not Eat. The University of Chicago Press
20. Selten, R., Schreckenberg, M., Pitz, T., Chmura, T., & Kube, S. (2006). Commuters route choice behaviour. Games and Economic Behavior. Forthcoming