Protocol for the 'e-Nudge trial': A randomised controlled trial of electronic feedback to reduce the cardiovascular risk of individuals in general practice [ISRCTN64828380]

Trials

Volumn 7, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Holt, Tim A ^a   Thorogood, Margaret ^a   Griffiths, Frances ^a   Munday, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b Warwickshire Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEART INFARCTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVENTION STUDY; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SAMPLE SIZE; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK;

EID: 33746145184     PISSN: 17456215     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-11     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. [http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/qof06~summclinical].
2. Hippisley-Cox J, O'Hanlon S, Coupland C: Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53,000 patients in primary care. BMJ 2004, 329(7477):1267-1269.
3. National Service Frameworks: Coronary Heart Disease. In Chapter Two: Preventing coronary heart disease in high-risk patients London: Dept of Health; 2000.
4. JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart 2005, 91(suppl 5):v1-v52. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.079988
5. Lobach DF: Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:493-497.
6. Kralj B, Iverson D, Hotz K, Ashbury FD: The impact of computerized clinical reminders on physician prescribing behavior: evidence from community oncology practice. Am J Med Qual 2003, 18(5):197-203.
7. Weaver FM, Goldstein B, Hammond M: Improving respiratory vaccination rates in veterans with spinal cord injury/disorders: lessons learned. SCI Nurs 2004, 21(3):143-148.
8. Kleschen MZ, Holbrook J, Rothbaum AK, Stringer RA, McInerney MJ, Helgerson SD: Improving the pneumococcal immunization rate for patients with diabetes in a managed care population: a simple intervention with a rapid effect. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2000, 26(9):538-546.
9. Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Newcomb C, Gorden SM: Measuring the effects of reminders for outpatient influenza immunizations at the point of clinical opportunity. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999, 6(2):115-121.
10. Hak E, van Essen GA, Stalman WA, de Melker RA: Improving influenza vaccination coverage among high-risk patients: a role for computer-supported prevention strategy? Fam Pract 1998, 15(2):138-143.
11. Lieu TA, Black SB, Ray P, Schwalbe JA, Lewis EM, Lavetter A, Morozumi PA, Shinefield HR: Computer-generated recall letters for underimmunized children: how cost-effective? Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997, 16(1):28-33.
12. Khoury AT, Wan GJ, Niedermaier ON, LeBrun B, Stiebeling B, Roth M, Alexander CM: Improved cholesterol management in coronary heart disease patients enrolled in an HMO. J Healthc Qual 2001, 23(2):29-33.
13. Hoch I, Heymann AD, Kurman I, Valinsky LJ, Chodick G, Shalev V: Countrywide computer alerts to community physicians improve potassium testing in patients receiving diuretics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10(6):541-546.
14. Stewart K, Loftus S, DeLisle S: Prescription of amiodarone through a computerized template that includes both decision support and executive functions improves the monitoring for toxicities. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:1020.
15. Toth-Pal E, Nilsson GH, Furhoff AK: Clinical effect of computer generated physician reminders in health screening in primary health care - a controlled clinical trial of preventive services among the elderly. Int J Med Inform 2004, 73(9-10):695-703.
16. Intille SS: A new research challenge: persuasive technology to motivate healthy aging. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004, 8(3):235-237.
17. Gandhi TK, Sequist TD, Poon EG, Karson AS, Murff H, Fairchild DG, Kuperman GJ, Bates DW: Primary care clinician attitudes towards electronic clinical reminders and clinical practice guidelines. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:848.
18. Weiner M, Callahan CM, Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Mamlin B, Dexter PR, McDonald CJ: Using information technology to improve the health care of older adults. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139(5 Pt 2):430-436.
19. Galanter WL, Didomenico RJ, Polikaitis A: A trial of automated decision support alerts for contraindicated medications using computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005, 12(3):269-274.
20. Yarnall KS, Rimer BK, Hynes D, Watson G, Lyna PR, Woods-Powell CT, Terrenoire J, Barber LT: Computerized prompts for cancer screening in a community health center. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998, 11(2):96-104.
21. Schellhase KG, Koepsell TD, Norris TE: Providers' reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patient's electronic medical record. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003, 16(4):312-317.
22. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, Harris LE, Zhou XH, Eckert GJ, Smith FE, Nienaber N, McDonald CJ, Wolinsky FD: Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2003, 18(12):967-976.
23. Filippi A, Sabatini A, Badioli L, Samani F, Mazzaglia G, Catapano A, Cricelli C: Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial. Diabetes Care 2003, 26(5):1497-1500.
24. [http://www.eguidelines.co.uk/awards/griffith_awards_oct02.html].
25. Lilford RJ, Chard T: The use of a small computer to provide action suggestions in the booking clinic. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi Acta Obstetrica et Gynaecologica Japonica 1984, 36(1):119-125.
26. Krall MA, Traunweiser K, Towery W: Effectiveness of an electronic medical record clinical quality alert prepared by offline data analysis. Medinfo 2004, 11(1):135-139.
27. Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, Cooper JM, Paterno MD, Soukonnikov B, Goldhaber SZ: Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2005, 352(10):969-977.
28. Safran C, Rind DM, Davis RB, Ives D, Sands DZ, Currier J, Slack WV, Makadon HJ, Cotton DJ: Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient's record. Lancet 1995, 346(8971):341-346.
29. Mitchell E, Sullivan F, Grimshaw JM, Donnan PT, Watt G: Improving management of hypertension in general practice: a randomised controlled feedback derived from electronic patient data. Br J Gen Pract 2005, 55:94-101.
30. Fung CH, Woods JN, Asch SM, Glassman P, Doebbeling BN: Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. Am J Manag Care 2004, 10(11 Pt 2):878-885.
31. Agrawal A, Mayo-Smith MF: Adherence to computerized clinical reminders in a large healthcare delivery network. Medinfo 2004, 11(1):111-114.
32. Dickey LL, Gemson DH, Carney P: Office system interventions supporting primary care-based health behavior change counseling. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1999, 17(4):299-308.
33. Holt TA, Ohno-Machado L: A nationwide adaptive prediction tool for coronary heart disease prevention. Br J Gen Pract 2003, 53:866-870.
34. Moher D, Schulz K, Altman D: The CONSORT statement revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001, 357:1191-1194.
35. Coronary heart disease statistics: 2004 Edition London: British Heart Foundation; 2004:58.
36. Rothwell PM, Coull AJ, Giles MF, Howard SC, Silver LE, Bull LM, Gutnikov SA, Edwards P, Mant D, Sackley CM, Farmer A, Sandercock PA, Dennis MS, Warlow CP, Bamford JM, Anslow P, (Oxford Vascular Study): Changes in stroke incidence, mortality, case fatality, severity and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet 2004, 363:1925-1933.
37. Bland M: An introduction to medical statistics 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:95-96.
38. Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A: Sample size tables for Clinical Trials Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1997.
39. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB: Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991, 121(1 Part2):293-298.
40. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter JF, Sever PS, Thom S McG: Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV. J Hum Hypertens 2004, 18:139-185.
41. Brindle P, Emberson J, Lampe F, Walker M, Whincup P, Fahey T, Ebrahim S: Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003, 327:1267.
42. Hingorani AD, Vallance P: A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing. BMJ 1999, 318:101-105.
43. Pocock SJ, McCormack V, Gueyffier F, Boutitie F, Fagard RH, Boissel J-P: A score for predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease in adults with raised blood pressure, based on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2001, 323(7304):75-81.
44. Morris AD, Boyle IRD, MacAlpine R, Emslie-Smith A, Jung RT, Newton RW, MacDonald TM, for the DARTS/MEMO Collaboration: The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (darts) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. BMJ 1997, 315:524-528.
45. World Health Organisation: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
46. Diabetes UK: Position statement: Early identification of type 2 diabetes. London: Diabetes UK; 2001.
47. Campbell NC, Murchie P: Treating hypertension with guidelines in general practice. BMJ 2004, 329:523-524.
48. National Service Framework for Diabetes: Standards. Clinical care of adults with diabetes. Volume 2. London: Department of Health; 2002.
49. Department of Health: Health Survey for England. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease. 2003, 2: [http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/09/ 89/11/04098911.pdf].