Interactions between microstructural and geometrical adaptation in human cortical bone

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1489-1498

  Ural, Ani ^a   Vashishth, Deepak ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone adaptation; Bone size; Microstructure; Modeling; Remodeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; DIAPHYSIS; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIOSTEUM; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TIBIA;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; HAVERSIAN SYSTEM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; TIBIA;

EID: 33746144904     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20159     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jepsen KJ, Akkus O, Majeska RJ, et al. 2003. Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice. Mamm Genome 14:97-104.
2. Yeni YN, Brown CU, Wang Z, et al. 1997. The influence of bone morphology on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia. Bone 21:453-459.
3. Evans FG, Bang S. 1967. Differences and the relationships between the physical properties and the microscopic structure of human femoral, tibial and fibular cortical bone. Am J Anat 20:79-88.
4. Evans FG, Vincentelli R. 1974. Relations of the compressive properties of human cortical bone to histological structure and calcification. J Biomech 7:1-10.
5. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, et al. 1993. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 75: 1193-1205.
6. Vincentelli R, Grigorov M. 1985. The effect of haversian modeling on the tensile properties of human cortical bone. J Biomech 18:201-207.
7. Bouxsein ML, Myburgh KH, van der Meulen MC, et al. 1994. Age-related differences in cross-sectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women. Calcif Tissue Int 54:113-118.
8. Carlson DS, Armelagos GJ, Van Gerven DP. 1976. Patterns of age-related cortical bone loss (osteoporosis) within the femoral diaphysis. Hum Biol 48:295-314.
9. Feik SA, Thomas CDL, Clement JG. 1996. Age trends in remodeling of the femoral midshaft differ between the sexes. J Orthop Res 14:590-597.
10. Martin RB, Atkinson PJ. 1977. Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. J Biomech 10:223-231.
11. Martin RB, Pickett JC, Zinaich S. 1980. Studies of skeletal remodeling in aging men. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 149:268-282.
12. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. 1982. Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. Science 217:945-948.
13. Ruff CB, Hayes WC. 1988. Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 6:886-896.
14. Stein MS, Thomas CDL, Feik SA, et al. 1998. Bone size and mechanics at the femoral diaphysis across age and sex. J Biomech 31:1101-1110.
15. Bergh MS, Muir P, Markel MD, et al. 2004. Femoral bone adaptation to stable long-term cemented total hip arthroplasty in dogs. Vet Surg 33:214-220.
16. Mason MW, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. 1995. Evidence of strain-mode-related cortical adaptation in the diaphysis of the horse radius. Bone 17:229-237.
17. Skedros JG, Sybrowsky CL, Parry TR, et al. 2003. Regional differences in cortical bone organization and microdamage prevalence in Rocky Mountain mule deer. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 274:837-850.
18. Burr DB, Stafford T. 1990. Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone micro-damage. Clin Orthop Rel Res 260:305-308.
19. Gruber HE, Marshall GJ, Kirchen ME, et al. 1985. Improvements in dehydration and cement line staining for methacrylate embedded human bone biopsies. Stain Technol 60:337-344.
20. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. 1987. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. J Bone Miner Res 2:595-610.
21. Ruff C. http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/FAE/mmacro.htm
22. O'Neill MC, Ruff C. 2004. Estimating human long bone cross-sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods. J Hum Evol 47:221-235.
23. Martin RB. 1984. Porosity and specific surface of bone. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 10:179-222.
24. Stein MS, Feik SA, Thomas CD, et al. 1999. An automated analysis of intracortical porosity in human femoral bone across age. J Bone Miner Res 14:624-632.
25. Thomas CD, Feik SA, Clement JG. 2005. Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences. J Anat 206:115-125.
26. Moro M, van der Meulen MCH, Kiratli BJ, et al. 1996. Bone mass is the primary determinant of midfemoral bone acquisition during adolescent growth. Bone 19:519-526.
27. van der Meulen MCH, Ashford MW, Kiratli BJ, et al. 1996. Determinants of femoral geometry and structure during adolescent growth. J Orthop Res 14:22-29.
28. Beck BR, Osternig LR. 1994. Medial tibial stress syndrome. The location of muscles in the leg in relation to symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1057-1061.
29. Burr DB. 1997. Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 12:1547-1551.
30. Heinonen A, McKay A, Whittall KP, et al. 2001. Muscle cross-sectional area is associated with specific site of bone in prepubertal girls: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Bone 29:388-392.
31. Klein CS, Allman BL, Marsh GD, et al. 2002. Muscle size, strength and bone geometry in the upper limbs of young and old men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57A:M455-M459.
32. Ekenman I, Halvorsen K, Westblad P, et al. 1998. Local bone deformation at two predominant sites for stress fractures of the tibia: an in vivo study. Foot Ankle Int 19: 479-484.
33. Dalen N, Laftman P, Ohlsen H, et al. 1985. The effect of athletic activity on the bone mass in human diaphyseal bone. Orthopedics 8:1139-1141.
34. Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, et al. 2000. Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351-357.
35. Jones HH, Priest JD, Hayes WC, et al. 1977. Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59:204-208.
36. Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD, Mason MW, et al. 1994. Analysis of a tension/ compression skeletal system: possible strain-specific differences in the hierarchical organization of bone. Anat Rec 239:396-404.
37. Johnson KA, Muir P, Nicoll RG, et al. 2000. Asymmetric adaptive modeling of central tarsal bones in racing greyhounds. Bone 27:257-263.
38. Johnson KA, Skinner GA, Muir P. 2001. Site-specific adaptive remodeling of Greyhound metacarpal cortical bone subjected to asymmetrical cyclic loading. Am J Vet Res 62:787-793.
39. Boudrieau RJ, Dee JF, Dee LG. 1984. Central tarsal bone fractures in the racing Greyhound: a review of 11 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 184:1486-1491.
40. Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang XF, et al. 2003. Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J Bone Miner Res 18:1766-1774.
41. Beck BR. 1998. Tibial stress injuries. An aetiological review for the purposes of guiding management. Sports Med 26:265-279.
42. Devas MB. 1958. Stress fractures of the tibia in atletes or 'shin shoreness.' J Bone Joint Surg 40:227-239.
43. Fredericson M, Bergman G, Hoffman KL, et al. 1995. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med 23:472-481.
44. Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Kinney JH, et al. Role of micro-structure in the aging-related deterioration of the toughness of human cortical bone. Materials Science and Engineering C (in press).
45. Tommasini SM, Nasser P, Schaffler MB, et al. 2005. Relationship between bone morphology and bone quality in male tibias: implications for stress fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 20:1372-1380.
46. O'Brien FJ, Taylor D, Lee CT. 2003. Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing of compact bone. J Biomech 36:973-980.
47. Schaffler MB, Choi K, Milgrom C. 1995. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone 17:521-525.
48. Jepsen KJ, Pennington DE, Lee Y-L, et al. 2001. Bone brittleness varies with genetic background in A/J and C57BL/6J inbred mice. J Bone Miner Res 16:1854-1862.
49. Sun Q, Turner CH. 2003. Two inbred rat strains that differ substantially in hip fragility. Calcif Tissue Int 72:1040-1047.
50. Turner CH, Roeder RK, Wieczorek A, et al. 2001. Variability in skeletal mass, structure and biomechanical properties among inbred strains of rats. J Bone Miner Res 16:1532-1539.
51. Turner CH, Hsieh Y-F, Muller R, et al. 2001. Variation in bone biomechanical properties, microstructure, and density in BXH recombinant inbred mice. J Bone Miner Res 16:206-213.