Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses to different stimulus classes

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Nager, Wido ^a,b   Estorf, Kaija ^b   Münte, Thomas F ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; REACTION TIME; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33746106078     PISSN: 14712202     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-31     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. MacLeod A, Summerfield AG: Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol 1987, 21:131-141.
2. Driver J: Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature 1996, 381:66-68.
3. Spence C, Driver J: Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996, 22:1005-1030.
4. Spence C, Driver J: Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial attention. Percept Psychophys 1997, 59:1-22.
5. Butter CM, Buchtel HA, Santucci R. Spatial attentional shifts: Further evidence for the role of polysensory mechanisms using visual and tactile stimuli. Neuropsychologio 1989, 27:1231-1240.
6. Eimer M, van Velzen J: Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:437-449.
7. Eimer M, Driver J: Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potential studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001, 25:497-511.
8. Hillyard SA, Simpson GV, Woods DL, Van Voorhis S, Münte TF: Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In Cortical Integration Edited by: Reinoso-Suarez F, Ajmone-Marsan C. New York: Raven Press; 1984:395-414.
9. McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Heraldez D, Hillyard SA: Electrophysiological evidence for the "missing link" in crossmodal attention. Can J Exp Psychol 2001, 55:141-149.
10. Teder-Salejarvi WA, Münte TF, Sperlich F, Hillyard SA: Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1999, 8:327-343.
11. Eason RG: Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention. Bull Psychonom Soc 1981, 18:203-206.
12. Luck SJ, Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Hillyard SA: Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of PI and NI components. Electroencephologr Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 75:528-542.
13. Heinze HJ, Luck SJ, Mangun GR, Hillyard SA: Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990, 75:511-527.
14. Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Burchert W, Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Münte TF, Gös A, Scherg M, Johannes S, Hundeshagen H, Gazzaniga MS, Hillyard SA: Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 1994, 372:543-546.
15. Mangun GR: The neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:4-18.
16. Näätänen R: Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 1982, 92:605-640.
17. Hansen JC, Hillyard SA: Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980, 49:277-290.
18. Woldorff MG, Gallen CC, Hampson SR, Hillyard SA, Sobel D, Pantev C, Sobel D, Bloom FE: Modulation of early sensory processing in human auditory cortex during auditory selective attention. Proc Natnl Acad Sci USA 1992, 90j:8722-8726.
19. Eimer M, Schröger E: ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:313-327.
20. Eimer M: Crossmodal links in spatial attention between vision, audition, and touch: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1292-1303.
21. Talsma D, Woldorff MG: Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. J Cogn Neurosci 2005, 17:1098-1114.
22. Mazza V, Turatto M, Sarlo M: Rare stimuli or rare changes: what really matters for the brain? Neuroreport 2005, 16:1061-1064.
23. Courchesne E, Hillyard SA, Galambos R: Stimulus novelty, task relevance, and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975, 39:131-143.
24. Barcelo F, Perianez JA, Knight RT: Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport 2002, 13:1887-1892.
25. Swets JA, Green DM, Getty DJ, Swets JB: Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation. Percept Psychophys 1978, 23:275-289.
26. Woods DL, Alho K, Algazi A: Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 82:341-355.
27. Driver J, Spence C: Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn Sci 1998, 2:254-262.