Electrophysiological evidence for the "missing link" in crossmodal attention

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 141-149

  McDonald, John J ^a,b   Teder Sälejärvi, Wolfgang A ^a   Heraldez, Daniel ^a   Hillyard, Steven A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; CUES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 0035377129     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087361     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Electroencephalographic Society (1994). Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 111-113.
2. Eimer, M. (1994). "Sensory gating" as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial cuing experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 667-675.
3. Eimer, M. (1996). ERP modulations indicate the selective processing of visual stimuli as a result of transient and sustained spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 33, 13-21.
4. Eimer, M., & Schröger, E. (1998). Effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 35, 313-327.
5. Farah, M. J., Wong, A. B., Monheit, M. A., & Morrow, L. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia, 27, 461-470.
6. Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cueing on event-related potentials during selective auditory attention. Psychophysiology, 21, 394-405.
7. Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177-180.
8. Hillyard, S. A., Mangun, G. R., Woldorff, M. G., & Luck, S. J. (1995) Neural systems mediating selective attention. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 665-681). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Hillyard, S. A., Simpson, G. V., Woods, D. L., Van Voorhis, S., & Münte, T. F. (1984). Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In F. Reinoso-Suárez & C. Ajmone-Marsan (Eds.), Cortical integration (pp. 395-414). New York: Raven Press.
10. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441-447.
11. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 887-904.
12. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials provide evidence for changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
13. McDonald, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., Di Russo, F., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000, October). Looking at sound: Involuntary auditory attention modulates neural processing in extrastriate visual cortex. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, San Diego, CA.
14. McDonald, J. J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000). Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature, 407, 906-908.
15. McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (1999). Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory covert spatial orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1234-1252
16. McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (2000). Involuntary listening aids seeing: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Science, 11, 167-171.
17. McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (2001). Crossmodal consequences of involuntary spatial attention orienting and inhibition of return. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18. Mondor, T. A., & Amirault, K. J. (1998). Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 745-755.
19. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Näätänen, R., & Michie, P. T. (1979). Early selective-attention effect on the evoked potential. A critical review and reinterpretation. Biological Psychology, 8, 81-136.
21. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. W. (1987). The N1 wave of the human electric and megnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375-425.
22. Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (1999). Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade? Neuropsychologia, 37, 357-377.
23. Schmitt, M., Postma, A., & de Haan, E. (2000). Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 105-130.
24. Schröger, E. (1993). Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli succeeding transient shifts of attention in a go/no go task. Biological Psychology, 36, 183-207.
25. Schröger, E., & Eimer, M. (1997). Endogenous covert spatial orienting in audition: "Cost-benefit" analyses of reaction times and event-related potentials. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 457-474.
26. Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M. Jr., (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.
27. Spence, C., & Driver, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1-22.
28. Spence, C., Nicholls, M. R., Gillespie, N., & Driver, J. (1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 544-557.
29. Teder, W. A., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1993). Interstimulus interval and the selective attention effect on auditory ERPs: "N1 enhancement" versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 71-81.
30. Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., Münte, T. F., Sperlich, F.-J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1999). Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 327-343.
31. Ward, L. M. (1994). Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 242-259.
32. Ward, L. M., McDonald, J. J., & Golestani, N. (1998). Crossmodal control of attention shifts. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 232-268). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Ward, L. M., McDonald, J. J., & Lin, D. (2000). On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1258-1264.
34. Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (1999, October). Do lateralized visual stimuli exogenously orient auditory attention? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Granada, Spain.
35. Woldorff, M. (1993). Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent EPRs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 30, 98-119.
36. Woods, D. L., Alho, K., & Algazi, A. (1991). Brain potential signs of feature processing during auditory selective attention. Neuroreport, 2, 189-192.