Landscape maps for enterprise architectures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4001 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 351-366

  Van Der Torre, Leendert ^a   Lankhorst, Marc M ^b   Ter Doest, Hugo ^b   Campschroer, Jan T P ^c   Arbab, Farhad ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^b TELEMATICA INSTITUUT   (Netherlands)

^c CWI ^*

^d CWI   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MANAGERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; VISUALIZATION;

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURES; LANDSCAPE MAPS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 33746087045     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and editors P. F. Patel-Schneider Description Logic Handbook; Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
2. F. de Boer, M. Bonsangue, L. Groenewegen, A. Stam, S.Stevens, and L. van der Torre. Change impact analysis of enterprise architecture. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI'05), 2005.
3. F. de Boer, M. Bonsangue, J. Jacob, A. Stam, and L. van der Torre. A logical viewpoint on architectures. In Proceedings of EDOC'04, pages 73-83. IEEE, 2004.
4. F. de Boer, M. Bonsangue, J. Jacob, A. Stam, and L. van der Torre. Enterprise architecture analysis with xml. In Proceedings of 38th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS'05), 2005.
5. A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke. Viewpoints: A framework for multiple perspectives in system development. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 2(1):31-57, 1992.
6. H. Jonkers, M.M. Lankhorst, R. van Buuren, S. Hoppenbrouwers, M. Bonsangue, and L. van der Torre. Concepts for modelling enterprise architectures. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(3):257-287, 2004.
7. A. Kleppe and J. Warmer. The object constraint language and its application in the UML metamodel. In Proceedings UML'98 Beyond the Notation, Mullhouse, France, 1998.
8. M. Lankhorst et al. Enterprise Architecture At Work. Springer, 2005.
9. N. Lassing, D. Rijsenbrij, and H. van Vliet. Viewpoints on modifiability. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 11 (4):453-478, 2001.
10. B. Nuseibeh, S. Easterbrook, and A. Russo. Making inconsistency respectable in software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 56(11), 2001.
11. IEEE Computer Society. IEEE Std 1472-2000: IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. 2000.
12. A. Stam, J. Jacob, F. de Boer, M. Bonsangue, and L. van der Torre. Using xml transformations for enterprise architectures. In Proceedings of ISOLA'04, 2004.
13. W.A.M. van der Sanden, P. Bergman, J.T.P. Campschroer, and H.R. de Reus. Realisatie van flexibele informatievoorziening (in dutch). Informatie, 41:58-65, 1999.
14. W.A.M. van der Sanden and B.J.A.M. Sturm. Informatiearchitectuur, de infrastructurele benadering (in dutch). 2000.
15. J. van Leeuwen, Ed. Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B: Formal Methods and Semantics. Amsterdam, 1994.