Measuring use of health services for at-risk drinkers: How brief can you get?

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 254-264

  Booth, Brenda M ^a,b,c   Kirchner, JoAnn E ^a,d   Fortney, Stacy M ^a,e   Han, Xiaotong ^a,d   Thrush, Carol R ^a,e   French, Michael T ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^c CeMHOR   (United States)

^d Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) North Little Rock   (United States)

^e CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^f Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAMPLE SIZE; SELF REPORT; TELECONSULTATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33746060195     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-006-9010-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Schmidt L, et al. Comparison of self-reported and medical record health care utilization measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49(9):989-995.
2. Wallihan DB, Stump TE, Callahan CM. Accuracy of self-reported health services use and patterns of care among urban older adults. Medical Care. 1999;37(7):662-670.
3. Reijneveld SA. The cross-cultural validity of self-reported use of health care: A comparison of survey and registration data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;53:267-272.
4. Kennedy ADM, Leigh-Brown AP, Torgerson DJ, et al. Resource use data by patient report or hospital records: Do they agree? BMC Health Services Research. 2002;2(2). Available at http://www.biomedicalcentral.com/1472-6963/2/2. Accessed December 9, 2005.
5. Marshall R, Grayson D, Jorm A, et al. Are survey measures of medical care utilisation misleading? A comparison of self-reported medical care consumption with actual medical care utilisation. Australian Health Review. 2001;24(3):91-99.
6. Booth BM, Kirchner J, Fortney J, et al. Rural at-risk drinkers: Correlates and one-year use of alcoholism treatment services. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2000;61(2):267-277.
7. Booth BM, Ross RL, Rost K. Rural and urban problem drinkers in six southern states. Substance Use and Misuse. 1999;34(4-5):471-494.
8. Clark RE, Ricketts SK, McHugo GJ. Measuring hospital use without claims: A comparison of patient and provider reports. Health Services Research. 1996;31(2):153-169.
9. Jensen GA, Morrisey MA. Group health insurance: A hedonic price approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1990;72(1):38-44.
10. Kashner TM, Rost K, Smith GR, et al. An analysis of panel data: The impact of a psychiatric consultation letter on the expenditures and outcomes of care for patients with somatization disorder. Medical Care. 1992;30(9):811-821.
11. Smith GR, Jr., Monson RA, Ray DC. Psychiatric consultation in somatization disorder: A randomized controlled study. New England Journal of Medicine. 1986;314:1407-1413.
12. Zhang M. Physicians contracting with managed care. Health Marketing Quarterly. 1995;12(3):71-83.
13. Zhang M, Rost KM, Fortney JC. Earnings changes for depressed individuals treated by mental health specialists. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(1):108-114.
14. Zhang M, Rost KM, Fortney JC. Depression treatment and cost offset for rural community residents with depression. Journal of Social Service Research. 1999;25(3):99-110.
15. Satariano WA, Smith J, Swanson A, et al. A census-based design for the recruitment of a community sample of older adults: Efficacy and costs. Annals of Epidemiology. 1998;8(4):278-282.
16. Wiseman F, Schafer M, Schafer R. An experimental test of the effects of a monetary incentive on cooperation rates and data collection costs in central-location interviewing. Journal of Marketing Research. 1983;20:439-442.
17. Harris LE, Weinberger M, Tierney WM. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences: A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Medical Care. 1997;35(1):70-76.
18. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: Results from a national survey. Medical Care. 1994;32(6):551-567.
19. O'Toole BI, Battistutta D, Long A, et al. A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: Mail, telephone and personal home interview. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986;124(2):317-328.
20. Perkins JJ, Sanson-Fisher RW. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1998;51(11):969-973.
21. Hoppe MJ, Gillmore MR, Valadez DL, et al. The relative costs and benefits of telephone interviews versus self-administered diaries for daily data collection. Evaluation Review. 2000;24(1):102-116.
22. Pruchno RA, Hayden JM. Interview modality: Effects on costs and data quality in a sample of older women. Journal of Aging and Health. 2000;12(1):3-24.
23. Allison JJ, Wall TC, Spettell CM, et al. The art and science of chart review. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 2000;26(3):115-136.
24. US Department of Health & Human Services. Administrative simplification under HIPAA: National standards for transactions, security and privacy, Fact Sheet. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/hipaa. html. Accessed March 3, 2003.