Student performance: Is more money the answer?

Journal of Education Finance

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 111-124

  Jefferson, Anne L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746038088     PISSN: 00989495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barrow, L., and C. E. Rouse. 2000. "Using Market Valuation to Assess the Importance and Efficiency of Public School Spending". NBER Working Paper no. 438. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
2. Barton, P. E. 2001. Facing the Hard Facts in Education Reform. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. Barton, P. E., R. J. Coley, and H. Wenglinsky. 1998. Order in the Classroom: Violence, Discipline, and Student Achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
4. Betts, J. R., K. S. Reuben, and A. Danenberg. 2000. "Equal Resources, Equal Outcomes? The Distribution of School Resources and Student Achievement in California." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 451291.
5. British Columbia Ministry of Education. 1998/1999. Annual Report. Victoria: Queen's Printer.
6. Canadian Education Statistics Council. 2000. Education Indicators in Canada: Report of the Pan-Canadian Education Indicators Program 1999. Ottawa: Author.
7. Clark, C. 1998. "Using School-Level Data to Explore Resources and Outcome in Texas." Journal of Education Finance 23(3): 374-389.
8. Clowes, G. A. 2002. "Tracking Spending and Student Achievement." Available online at http://www.heartland.org/education/febo2/ tracking.htm.
9. Cohen-Vogel, L. A., and D. R. Cohen-Vogel. 2001. "School Finance Reform in Tennessee: Inching Toward Adequacy." Journal of Education Finance 26(3): 297-318.
10. Coleman, J. S., E. Q. Campbell, C. J. Hobson, J. McPartland, A. M. Mood, F. D. Weinfield, and R. L. York. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11. Coleman, P. 1986a. "The Good School District: A Critical Examination of the Adequacy of Student Achievement and Per Pupil Expenditures as Measures of School District Effectiveness." Journal of Education Finance 12(1):71-96.
12. Coleman, P. 1986b. "School Districts and Student Achievement in British Columbia: A Preliminary Analysis." Canadian Journal of Education 11(4):509-521.
13. CPRE University of Wisconsin-Madison, n.d. "Uses of the Educational Dollar: Expenditure Patterns." Available online at http://www.wcer.wisc. edu/cpre/finance/related/general/allocation.asp.
14. Fowler, W. J., and D. H. Monk. 2001. "A Primer for Making Cost Adjustments in Education." Washington, DC: NCES Research and Development Report 2001-323.
15. Greenwald, R., L. V. Hedges, and R. Laine. 1996a. "The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement." Review of Educational Research 66(3):361-396.
16. Greenwald, R., L. V. Hedges, and R. Laine, 1996b. "Interpreting Research on School Resources and Student Achievement: A Rejoinder to Hanushek." Review of Educational Research 66(3):411-416.
17. Gundlach, E., L. Wossmann, and J. Gmelin. 2001. "The Decline of Schooling Productivity in OECD Countries." Economic Journal 111(471):C135-C146.
18. Hanushek, E. A. 1996. "A More Complete Picture of School Resource Policies." Review of Educational Research 66(3):397-409.
19. Hanushek, E. A. 1999. "The Evidence on Class Size." In S. E. Mayer and P. E. Peterson (eds.), Earning and Learning: How Schools Matter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 131-168.
20. Harter, E. A. 1999. "How Educational Expenditures Relate to Student Achievement: Insights from Texas Elementary Schools." Journal of Education Finance 24(3):281-302.
21. Hedges, L. V., R. D. Laine, and R. Greenwald. 1994. "Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes." Educational Researcher 23(3):5-14.
22. Laine, R. D., R. Greenwald, and L. V. Hedges. 1996. "Money Does Matter: A Research Synthesis of a New Universe of Education Production Function Studies." In L. O. Picus and J. L. Wattenbarger (eds.), Where Does the Money Go? Resource Allocation in Elementary and Secondary Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, pp.44-70.
23. LeFevre, A. T., and R. S. Hederman. 2001. "Report Card on American Education: A State-by-State Analysis, 1976-2000." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 456-497.
24. Machlup, F. 1970. Education and Economic Growth. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
25. McPherson, A. 1993. "Measuring Added Value in Schools." Education Economics 1(1):43-51.
26. Miller, K. 2002. "Resource Allocation: Targeting Funding for Maximum Impact." McREL Policy Brief: ERIC Document Reproduction no. EA 031 682.
27. Murname, R. J., and F. Levy. 1996. "Evidence from Fifteen Schools in Austin, Texas." In G. Burtless (ed.), Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp.93-96.
28. National Education Association. 1995. "How Education Spending Matters to Economic Development." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 389 062.
29. OECD. 2001. Investing in Competencies for All. Paris: Meeting of the OCED Education Ministers Communiqué. April 4.
30. Picus, L. O. 2000. "How Schools Allocate and Use Their Resources." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 452 578.
31. Picus, L. O., and E. Robillard. 2000. "The Collection and Use of Student Level Data: Implications for School Finance Research." Educational Considerations 28(1):26-31.
32. Pritchett, L., and D. Filmer. 1999. "What Education Production Functions Really Show: A Positive Theory of Education Expenditure." Economics of Education Review 18:223-239.
33. Skandera, H., and R. Sousa. 2002. "Does Improved Student Achievement Require Increased Resources?" Available online at http://www.heartland. org/education/febo2/resources.htm.
34. Slavin, R. E. 1999. "How Can Funding Equity Ensure Enhanced Achievement?" Journal of Education Finance 24(4):519-528.
35. Sum, A., I. Kirsch, and R. Taggart. 2002. The Twin Challenges of Mediocrity and Inequality: Literacy in the U.S. from an International Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
36. Tan, J. P., and A. Mingat. 1992. Education in Asia: A Comparative Study of Cost and Financing. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
37. Taylor, C. 1997. "The Effect of School Expenditures on the Achievement of High School Students: Evidence from NELS and the CCD." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 409 358.
38. Towers, J. M. 1992. "Twenty-Five Years After the Coleman Report: What Should We Have Learned?" Contemporary Education 63(2):93-95.
39. Triplett, T. 1995. "Legal Issues and Constraints Affecting Finance Reform for Education and Related Services." Paper prepared for The Finance Project, Washington, DC.
40. Verstegen, D. A., and R. A. King. 1998. "The Relationship Between School Spending and Student Achievement: A Review and Analysis of 35 Years of Production Function Research." Journal of Education Finance 24(2):243-262.
41. Wenglinsky, H. 1997. When Money Matters. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
42. Williams, W. E. 1999. "More Money Better Education?" Available online at http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/99. February 1.
43. Womack, S. T. 2000. "The Relationship Between Resources and Academic Achievement." ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 456 498.