Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 612-618

  Anderson, Gregory ^a   Fields, Henry W ^a   Beck, Michael ^a   Chacon, Guillermo ^a   Vig, Katherine W L ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Norms; Receiver operating characteristic

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745995449     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75(6):599-617.
2. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod. 1931;1:45-66.
3. American Board of Orthodontics. Available at: www.americanboardortho.com/ professionals/road_cert/phase_iii/cmf.aspx. Accessed April 15, 2005.
4. Han UK, Vig KWL, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100(3):212-219.
5. Shuen S, Ngan P, Fields HW, Beck FM. Accuracy and reliability of diagnosing Class III malocclusion in the young patient. J Dent Res. 1995;74(Special Issue):1184.
6. Atchison KA, Luke LS, White SC. Contribution of pretreatment radiographs to orthodontists' decision making. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991;71(2):238-245.
7. Kelson DA, Fields HW, Beck FM, Shanker S. Concordance of multiple A-P cephalometric measurements in long-, normal-, and short-faced individuals at various treatment stages. J Dent Res. 2003;82(Special Issue A):1490.
8. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:506-510.
9. Han UK, Kim YH. Determination of Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis on various cephalometric measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:538-545.
10. Fletcher R, Fletcher S, Wagner E. Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials. Baltimore, Md: Williams&Wilkins; 1988:49-51.
11. Rabe K, Fields HW, Vig KWL, Beck FM, Bomeli P, Lin H. Validation of a vertical facial morphology classification algorithm. J Dent Res. 2004;83(Special Issue A):1258.
12. Fields HW, Proffit WR, Nixon WL, Phillips C, Stanek E. Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:217-223.
13. Downs WB. Variation in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34(10):812-840.
14. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(6):449-469.
15. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125-138.
16. Kim YH, Vietas JJ. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator: an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:619-633.
17. Harvold EP. The Activator in Interceptive Orthodontics. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby; 1974:9-26.
18. Broadbent BH Sr, Broadbent BH Jr, Golden WH. Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth. St Louis, Mo: CV Moby; 1975:28.
19. Lau AHL, Lau HS, Zhang Y. A simple and logical alternative for making PERT time estimates. IIE Trans. 1996;23(3):183-192.
20. Bomeli P, Fields HW, Beck FM, Vig KWL, Firestone A, Shanker S. Concordance between dental and skeletal relationships. J Dent Res. 2003;82(Special Issue A):1139.
21. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39(4):561-577.