Optical coherence tomography from viewpoint of information efficiency

Imaging Science Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 92-102

  Mazurenko, Y ^a  

^a VAVILOV STATE OPTICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Frequency domain OCT; Information capacity; Interferometry; Optical coherence tomography; Time domain OCT

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745978723     PISSN: 13682199     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/174313106X93741     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., Hee, M. R., Flotte, T., Gregory, K., Puliaftio, C. A. and Fujimoto, J. G. Optical coherence tomography. Science, 1991, 254, 1178-1181.
2. Fercher, A. F., Drexler, W., Hitzenberger, C. K. and Lasser, T. Optical coherence tomography - principles and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys., 2003, 66, 239-303.
3. Podoleanu, A. G., Dobre, G. M. and Jackson, D. A. En-face coherence imaging using galvanometer scanner modulation. Opt. Lett., 1998, 23, 147-149.
4. Born, M. and Wolf, E. Principles of Optics, 2nd edition, 1964 (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
5. Mazurenko, Yu. T. and Papayan, G. V. Spectral heterodyne tomography. Opt. Spectr., 2004, 96, 305-312.
6. Mitsui, T. Dynamic range of optical reflectometry with spectral interferometry. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1, 1999, 38, 6133-6137.
7. Wojtkowski, M., Leitgeb, R., Kowalczyk, A., Bajraszewski, T. and Fercher, A. F. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. J. Biomed. Opt., 2002, 7, 457-463.
8. De Boer, V, Cense, B., Park, B. H., Pierce, M. C., Tearney, G. J. and Bouma, B. E. Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett., 2003, 28, 2067-2069.
9. Leitgeb, R. A., Hitzenberger, C. K. and Fercher, A. F. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Expr., 2003, 11, 889-894.
10. Choma, M. A., Sarunic, M. V., Yang, C. and Izatt, J. A. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Expr., 2003, 11, 2183-2189.
11. Papoulis, A. Systems and Transforms with Applications in Optics, 1968 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
12. Wang, R. K. Resolution improved optical coherencegated tomography for imaging through biological tissues. J. Mod. Opt., 1999, 46, 1905-1912.
13. Mazurenko, Y. Time-domain and frequency-domain optical coherence tomography from the viewpoint of information efficiency. Proc. OSAV'2004, Int. Topical Meeting on Optical Sensing and Artificial Vision, St Petersburg, Russia, 18-21 October, pp. 210-218 (State University ITMO).
14. Shannon, C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1948, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
15. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication, 1949 (University of Illinois Press, Urbana).
16. Swanson, E. A., Huang, D., Hee, M. R., Fujimoto, J. G., Lin, C. P. and Puliafito, C. A. High-speed optical coherence domain reflectometry. Opt. Lett., 1992, 17, 151-153.
17. Rollins, A. M., Yazdanfar, S., Kulkarni, M. D., Ung-Arunyawee, R. and Izatt, J. A. In vivo video rate optical coherence tomography. Opt. Expr., 1998, 3, 219-229.
18. Yariv, A. Introduction to Optical Electronics, 1976, 2nd edition (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).
19. Kobayashi, K. Imaging techniques and applications of the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Opt. Eng., 1995, 34, 717-725.