Chemical interactions in the Cactus-Microorganism-Drosophila Model System of the Sonoran Desert

American Zoologist

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 877-889

  Fogleman, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745971801     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/41.4.877     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Antony, C. and J. M. Jallon. 1982. The chemical basis for sex recognition in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28:873-880.
2. Barrows, W. M. 1907. The reaction of the pomace fly, Drosophila ampelophila Loew, to odorous substances. J. Exp. Zool. 4:515-537.
3. Bellen, H. J. 1998. The fruit-fly: A model organism to study the genetics of alcohol abuse and.addiction. Cell 93:909-912. ;
4. Berenbaum, M. R. 1986. Target site insensitivity in insect-plant interactions. In L. B. Brattsten and S. Ahmad (eds.), Molecular aspects of insect-plant associations, pp. 257-272. Plenum Press, New York.
5. Brattsten,-L. B. 1986. Fate of ingested plant allelochemicals in herbivorous insects. In L. B. Brattsten and S. Ahmad (eds.), Molecular aspects of insect-plant associations, pp. 211-256. Plenum Press, New York.
6. Brattsten, L. B. 1988. Enzymatic adaptations in leaffeeding insects to host-plant allelochemicals. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1919-1939.
7. Brazner, J. C. and W. J. Etges. 1993. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila inojaveiisis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evol. Ecol. 7:605-624.
8. Brown, S. D., J. E. Hodgkins, J. L. Massingill, Jr.,and M. G. Reinecke. 1972. The isolation, structure, synthesis, and absolute configuration of the cactus alkaloid, gigantine. J. Org. Chem. 37:1825-1828.
9. Campbell, C. E. and H. W. Kircher. 1980. Senita cactus: A plant with interrupted sterol biosynthetic pathways. Phytochemistry 19:2777-2779.
10. Danielson, P. B., M. R. Frank, and J. C. Fogleman. 1994. Comparison of larval and adult P450 activity levels for alkaloid metabolism in desert Drosophila. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1893-1906.
11. Danielson, P. B., R. J. Maclntyre, and J. C. Fogleman. 1997. Molecular cloning of a family of xenobiotic-inducible drosophilid cytochrome P450s: Evidence for involvement in host-plant allelochemical resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 94: 10797-10802.
12. Danielson, P. B., J. L. M. Foster, S. K. Cooper, and J. C. Fogleman. 1999. Diversity of expressed cytochrome P450 genes in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Insect Molec. Biol. 8:149-160.
13. Djerassi, C. and A. E. Lippman. 1955. Terpenoids. XIII. The structure of the cactus triterpenes machaeric acid and machaerinic acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77:1825-1828.
14. Djerassi, C., L. E. Geller, and A. J. Lemin. 1953a. Terpenoids. I. The triterpenes of the cactus Lamaireocereus thurberi. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75: 2254-2256.
15. Djerassi, C., N. Frick, and L. E. Geller. 19536. Alkaloid Studies. I. The isolation of pilocereine from the cactus Lophocereus schottii. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75:3632-3635.
16. Djerassi, C., L. E. Geller, and A. J. Lemin. 1954n. Terpenoids. VIII. The structures of the cactus tri-terpenes gummosogenin and longispinogenin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76:4089-4091.
17. Djerassi, C, C. R. Smith, S. P. Marfey, R. N. McDonald, A. J. Lemin, S. K. Sigdor, and H. Estrada. 954b. Alkaloid'Studies. III. Isolation of pilocereine and anhalonidine from four cactus species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76:3215-3217.
18. Djerassi, C., E. Farkas, L. H. Liu, and F. H. Thomas. 1955. Terpenoids. XVII. The cactus triterpenes thurberogenin and stellatogenin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77:5330-5336.
19. Djerassi, C., S. K. Figdor, J. M. Bobbin, and F. X. Markley. 1957. Alkaloid studies. XVII. The structure of the cactus alkaloid pilocereine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:2203-2210.
20. Djerassi, C., G. W. Krakower, A. J. Lemin, L. H. Liu, J. S. Mills, and R. Villotti. 1958. The neutral constituents of the cactus Lophocereus scliottii. The structure of lophenol-4a-methyl-A7-cholesten3-ol-a link in sterol biogenesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80:6284-6292.
21. Djerassi, C., H. W. Brewer, C. Clarke, and L. J. Dur- -ham. 1962. Alkaloid Studies. XXXVIII. Pilocereine-a trimeric cactus alkaloid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84:3210-3212.
22. Etges, W. J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46:1945-1950.
23. Etges, W. J. 1998. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life history trait. Am. Nat. 152:129-144.
24. Feeney, P. P. 1970. Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51:565-581.
25. Fellows, D. P. and W. B. Heed. 1972. Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactophilic Drosophila. Ecology 53:850-858.
26. Fogleman, J. C. 1982. The role of volatiles in the ecology of cactophilic Drosophila. In J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer (eds.), Ecological genetics and evolution: The caclns-yeast-Drosophila model system, pp. 191-206. Academic Press, Australia.
27. Fogleman, J. C. 1990. William B. Heed (A Biography). In J. S. F. Barker, R. J. Maclntyre, and W. T. Starmer (eds.), Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila, pp. 1-14. Plenum Press, New York.
28. Fogleman, J. C. and H. W. Kircher. 1986. Differential effects of fatty acid chain length on the viability of two species of cactophilic Drosophila. Comp. Biochem. and Physiol. 83A:761-764.
29. Fogleman, J. C. and W. B. Heed. 1989. Columnar cacti and desert Drosophila: The chemistry of host plant specificity. In J. Schmidt (ed.), Special biotic relationships in the arid southwest, pp. 1-24. Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
30. Fogleman, J. C. and J. R. Abril. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary importance of host plant chemistry. In J. S. F. Barker, R. J. Maclntyre, and W. T. Starmer (eds.), Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila, pp. 121-143. Plenum Press, New York.
31. Foglcman, J. C., W. B. Heed, and H. W. Kircher. 1982. Drosophila mettleri and senita cactus alkaloids: Fitness measurements and their ecological significance. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 71A:413-4I7.
32. Fogleman, J. C., S. M. Dupcrret, and H. W. Kircher. 1986. The role of phytosterols in host plant utilization by cactophilic Drosophila. Lipids 21:9296.
33. Foster, J. L. M. and J. C. Fogleman. 1993. Identification and ecology of the bacterial coVnmunities associated with the necroses of three Species of cacti. Appl. and Envir. Microbiol. 59:1-6.
34. Frank, M. R. and J. C. Fogleman. 1992. Involvement of cytochrome P450 in host plant utilization by Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 89:11998-12002.
35. Frohman, M. A., M. K. Dush, and G. R. Martin. 1988. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: Amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. U.S.A. 85:8998-9002.
36. Gonzalez, F. J. and D. W. Nebert. 1990. Evolution of the P450 gene superfamily: Animal-plant 'war- . fare", molecular drive and human genetic differences in drug oxidation. Trends in Genetics 6: 182-186.
37. Hargrove, W. W. and D. A. Crossley, Jr. 1985. Withinleaf feeding site selection by black locust herbivores: Implications for plant defense. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Amer. 66:187.
38. Hashimoto, T. and Y. Yamada. 1994. Alkaloid biogenesis: Molecular aspects. In R. L. Jones, C. R. Somerville, and V. Walbot (eds.), Annual review of plant physiology ana plant molecular biology, Vol. 45, pp. 257-285. Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
39. Heed, W. B. 1977. A new cactus-feeding but soilbreeding species of Drosophila (Diptera:Drosophilidae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 79:649-654.
40. Heed, W. B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila. In P. F. Brassard (ed.), Ecological genetics: The interface, pp. 109-126. Springer-Verlag, New York.
41. Heed, W. B. and H. W. Kircher. 1965. A unique sterol in the ecology and nutrition of Drosophila pa.chea. Science 149:758-761.
42. Kircher, H. W. 1977. Triterpene glycosides and queretaroic acid in organ pipe cactus. Phytochemistry 16:1078-1080.
43. Kircher, H. W. 1980. Trilerpenes in organ pipe cactus. Phytochemistry 19:2707-2712.
44. Kircher, H. W. 1982. Chemical composition of cacti and its relationship to Sonoran Desert Drosophila. In J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Starmer (eds.). Ecological genetics and evolution: The cactus-yeastDrosophila model system, pp. 143-158. Academic Press, Australia.
45. Kircher, H. W. and H. L. Bird Jr. 1982. Five 3, 6adihydroxysteols in organ-pipe cactus. Phytochemistry 21:1705-1710.
46. Kircher, H. W., W. B. Heed, J. S. Russell, and J. Grove. 1967. Senita cactus alkaloids: Their significance to Sonoran Desert Drosophila ecology. J. Insect Physiol. 13:1869-1874.
47. Kutchan, T. M. 1995. Alkaloid biosynthesis-The basis for metabolic engineering of medicinal plants. The Plant Cell 7:1059-1070.
48. Markow, T. A. and E. C. Toolson. 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. In J. S. F. Barker, R. J. Maclntyre, and W. T. Starmer (eds.), Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila, pp. 315-331. Plenum Press, New York.
49. Meyer, J. M. and J. C. Fogleman. 1987. Significance of saguaro cactus alkaloids in the ecology of Drosophila mclllcri, a soil-breeding, cactophilic drosophilid. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:2069-2081.
50. Newby, B. D. and W. J. Etges. 1998. Host preference among populations of Drosophila mojavensis that use different host cacti. J. Insect. Behavior 11: 691-712.
51. Nelson, D. R., T. Kamataki, D. J. Waxman, F. P. Guengcrich, R. W. Estabrook, R. Feyereisen, F. J. Gonzalez, M. J. Coon, I. C. Gunsalus, O. Gotoh, K. Okuda, and D. W. Neben. 1993. The P450 super- family: Update on new sequences, gene mapping, accession numbers, early trivial names of enzymes and nomenclature. DNA Cell Biol. 12:1-51.
52. Omura, T. and R. Sato. 1964. The carbon monoxidebinding pigment of liver microsomes. 1. Evidence for its hemoprotein nature. J. Biol. Chem. 239: 2370-2378.
53. Patterson, J. T. and J. F. Crow. 1940. Hybridization in the mullcri group of Drosophila. Univ. Tex. Publ. 4032:251-256.
54. Patterson, J. T. and M. R. Wheeler. 1942. Description of new species of the subgenera Hirtodrosophila and Drosophila. Univ. Tex. Publ. 4213:62-109.
55. Schultz, J. C. 1983. Impact of variable plant defensive chemistry on susceptibility of insects to natural enemies. In P. A. Hedin (ed.), Plant resistance to insects, pp. 37-54, Symp. Ser. No. 208. Amer. Chem. Soc. Washington.
56. Starmer, W. T. and V. Aberdeen. 1990. The nutritional importance of pure and mixed cultures of yeasts in the development of Drosophila nntlleri larvae in Opuntia tissues and its relationship to host plant shifts. In J. S. F. Barker, R. J. Maclntyre, and W. T. Starmer (eds.). Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila, pp. 145-160. Plenum Press, New York.
57. Starmer, W. T, M.-A. LaChance, H. J. Phaff, and W. B. Heed. 1990. The biogeography of yeasts associated with decaying cactus tissue in North America, the Caribbean, and northern Venezuela. Evol. Biol. 24:253-296.
58. Stennett, M. D. and W. J. Etges. 1997. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:28032824.
59. Wasserman, M. and H. R. Koepfer. 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31:812-823.
60. Wilkie, T. M. and M. I. Simon. 1991. Cloning multigene families with degenerate PCR primers. Methods: A companion to Methods in Enzymology 2:32-41.
61. Zhao, Z. Y. and R. H. Joho. 1990. Isolation of distantly related members in a multigene family using the polymerase chain reaction technique. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 167:174-182.
62. Zouros, E. and D. J. D'Entremont. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: Response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34:421-430.