Test stimulus characteristics determine the perceived speed of the dynamic motion aftereffect

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 19, 2006, Pages 3284-3290

  Curran, William ^a   Benton, Christopher P ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Motion aftereffect; Motion perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSOCIATION; DYNAMIC EXERCISE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 33745964744     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anstis S.M. The perception of apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soceity of London Series B Biological Sciences 290 (1980) 153-168
2. Ashida H., and Osaka N. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Vision Research 35 (1995) 1825-1833
3. Derrington A.M., and Badcock D.R. Separate detectors for simple and complex patterns?. Vision Research 25 (1985) 1869-1878
4. Edwards M., Badcock D.R., and Smith A.T. Independent speed-tuned global-motion systems. Vision Research 38 (1998) 1573-1580
5. Festa E.K., and Welch L. Recruitment mechanisms in speed and fine-direction discrimination tasks. Vision Research 37 (1997) 3129-3143
6. Hiris E., and Blake R. Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89 (1992) 9025-9028
7. Kohn A., and Movshon J.A. Neuronal adaptation to visual motin in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 39 (2003) 681-691
8. Mather G., Verstraten F., and Anstis S. The motion aftereffect. A modern perspective (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massuchusetts
9. Matthews N., Luber B., Qian N., and Lisanby S.H. Transcranial magnetic stimulatin differentially affects speed and direction judgments. Experminetal Brain Research 140 (2001) 397-406
10. Matthews N., and Qian N. Axis-of-motion affects direction discrimination, not speed discrimination. Vision Research 39 (1999) 2205-2211
11. McCarthy J.E. Directional adapation effects with contrast modulated stimuli. Vision Research 33 (1993) 2653-2662
12. Moulden B. After-effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soceity of London Series B Biological Sciences 290 (1980) 39-55
13. Newsome W.T., and Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neurosciences 8 (1988) 2201-2211
14. Nishida S., and Ashida H. A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects. Vision Research 40 (2000) 265-278
15. Nishida S., Ashida H., and Sato T. Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test. Vision Research 20 (1994) 2707-2716
16. Nishida S., and Sato T. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research 35 (1995) 477-490
17. Orban G.A., Saunders R.C., and Vandenbussche E. Lesions of the superior temporal cortical motion areas impair speed discrimination in the macaque monkey. European Journal of Neurosciences 7 (1995) 2261-2276
18. Pantle A. Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-selective analyzers. Vision Research 14 (1974) 1229-1236
19. Pantle, A. (1998). The motion aftereffect. A modern perspective. In: G. Mather, F. Verstraten, & S. Anstis (Eds.), Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 25-40.
20. Snowden R.J. Suppressive interactions between moving patterns: role of velocity. Perception and Psychophysics 47 (1990) 74-78
21. Tao R., Lankheet M.J.M., van de Grind W.A., and van Wezel R.J.A. Velocity dependence of the interocular transfer of dynamic motion aftereffects. Perception 32 (2003) 855-866
22. Thompson P., and Wright J. The role of intervening patterns in the storage of the movement aftereffect. Perception 23 (1994) 1233-1240
23. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vision Research 35 (1995) 2503-2522
24. van der Smagt M.J., Verstraten F.A.J., and van de Grind W.A. A new transparent motion aftereffect. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 595-596
25. Verstraten F.A.J., Fredericksen R.E., and van Wezel R.J.A. Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: evidence for two mechanisms. Vision Research 36 (1996) 421-424
26. Verstraten F.A.J., van der Smagt M.J., Fredericksen R.E., and van de Grind W.A. Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions. Vision Research 39 (1999) 803-810
27. Verstraten F.A.J., van der Smagt M.J., and van de Grind W.A. Aftereffect of high-speed motion. Perception 27 (1998) 1055-1066
28. von Grunau M.W. Bivectorial transparent stimuli simultaneously adapt mechanisms at different levels of the motion pathway. Vision Research 42 (2002) 577-587
29. Wade, N.J., & Verstraten, F.A.J. (1998). The motion aftereffect. A modern perspective. In G. Mather, F. Verstraten, & S. Anstis (Eds.), Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-24.
30. Watamaniuk S.N.J., and Duchon A. The human visual system averages speed information. Vision Res. 32 (1992) 931-941
31. Watt R.J., and Andrews D.P. Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions. Current Psychological Review 1 (1981) 205-214
32. Williams D.W., and Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research 24 (1984) 55-62