A multi-scale hybrid linear model for lossy image representation

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn I, Issue , 2005, Pages 764-771

  Hong, Wei ^a   Wright, John ^a   Huang, Kun ^b   Ma, Yi ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOWN-SAMPLING SCALES; HYBRID LINEAR MODELS; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; NATURAL IMAGES;

DATA REDUCTION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HYBRID COMPUTERS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; SAMPLING; VECTORS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 33745934479     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2005.12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. P. J. Burt and E. H. Adelson. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans. Commun., 31(4):532-540, 1983.
2. E.J. Candès and D. L. Donoho. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with smooth singularities. Technical Report, Stanford University, 2002.
3. R. A. DeVore, B. Jawerth, and B. J. Lucier. Image compression through wavelet transform coding. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 38(2):719-746, 1992.
4. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli. Contourlets: A directional multiresolution image representation. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2002.
5. D. L. Donoho. Wedgelets: nearly-minimax estimation of edges. Ann. Statist., 27:859-897, 1999.
6. D. L. Donoho and M. Vetterli. Data compression and harmonic analysis. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 44(6):2435-2476, 1998.
7. M. Effros and P.A. Chou. Weighted universal transform coding: Universal image compression with the Karhunen-Loéve transform. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, volume 2, pages 61-64, 1995.
8. Y. Fisher. Fractal Image Compression: Theory and Application. Springer-Verlag Telos, 1995.
9. A. Gersho and R. M. Gray. Vector Quantization and Signal Compression. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
10. W. Hong, J. Wright, K. Huang, and Y. Ma. Multi-scale hybrid linear models for lossy image representation, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005.
11. K. Huang, Y. Ma, and R. Vidal. Minimum effective dimension for mixtures of subspaces: A robust GPCA algorithm and its applications. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004.
12. K. Huang, A. Y. Yang, and Y. Ma. Sparse representation of images with hybrid linear models. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2004.
13. R. Jancey. Multidimensional group analysis. Austral. J. Botany, 14:127-130, 1966.
14. E. LePennec and S. Mallat. Sparse geometric image representation with bandelets. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14(4):423-438, 2005.
15. S. Mallat. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 1999.
16. R. Neal and G. E. Hinton. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. Learning in Graphical Models, 1998.
17. J. M. Shapiro. Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 41(12):3445-3463, 1993.
18. R. Vidal, Y. Ma, and J. Piazzi. A new GPCA algorithm for clustering subspaces by fitting, differentiating and dividing polynomials. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume I, pages 510-517, 2004.
19. G. K. Wallace. The JPEG still picture compression standard. Communications of the ACM. Special issue on digital multi-media systems, 34(4):30-44, 1991.