Managing and communicating information on the stanford living laboratory feasibility study

Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction

Volumn 11, Issue , 2006, Pages 607-626

  Haymaker, John ^b   Ayaz, Engin ^b   Fischer, Martin ^b   Kam, Calvin ^b   Kunz, John ^a,b   Ramsey, Marc ^b   Suter, Ben ^b   Toledo, Mauricio ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Decisions; Integration; Narratives; Organization modeling; Process modeling; Product modeling

Indexed keywords

DECISIONS; NARRATIVES; ORGANIZATION MODELING; PROCESS MODELING; PRODUCT MODELING;

DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERSONNEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 33745922878     PISSN: 14006529     EISSN: 14006529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Augenbroe G. (1995a). COMBINE-2 Final Report, CEC-DGXII, Brussels.
2. Bjork B.-C. (1989). Basic structure of a proposed building product model, Computer-Aided Design, 21(2), 71-78.
3. BNIM (2002). Building for Sustainability Report: Six scenarios for the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Los Altos Project, http://www.bnim.com/ newsite/pdfs/2002-Report.pdf
4. Choo H.J., Hammond J., Tommelein I.D., Austin S. & Ballard G. (2004). DePlan: Tool for Integrated Design Management, Automation in Construction, 13 (3) 313-326, May.
5. CIFE Interactive Workspaces Group (2002). iRoom Documentation, Stanford University, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, http://cife.stanford. edu/IROOM/documentation/document-frames.htm
6. Eastman C. & Jeng T. S. (1999). A Database Supporting Evolutionary Product Model Development for Design, Automation in Construction, 8 (3), 305-23.
7. Eppinger S., Whitney D., Smith R. & Gebala D. (1990). Organizing the Tasks in Complex Design Projects, ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Chicago, IL, September, 39-46.
8. Gero J. S. (1990). Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design, AI Magazine, Special issue on AI based design systems (Maher M.L. & Gero J.S., guest editors), 11(4), 26-36. http://www.gbxml.org/, accessed April 27, 2005.
9. Gielingh W. (1988). General AEC Reference Model (GARM), ISO TC184/SC4, TNO-IBBC.
10. Haymaker J., Fischer M., Kunz J. & Suter B. (2004). Engineering test cases to motivate the formalization of an AEC project model as a directed acyclic graph of views and dependencies, ITcon Vol. 9.
11. Haymaker J. & Fischer M. (2005). Formalizing Sustainable Design Narratives, in review.
12. Haymaker J. & Chachere J. (2006). Coordinating goals, preferences, options, and analyses for the Stanford Living Laboratory feasibility study, 13th EG-ICE Workshop Intelligent Computing in Engineering & Architecture (Smith I., editor), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, in press.
13. Kam C., Fischer M., Hänninen R., Karjalainen A. & Laitinen J. (2003). The Product Model and Fourth Dimension Project, Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, ITcon Vol. 8, 137-166.
14. Kam C. (2005). Dynamic Decision Breakdown Structure: Ontology, Methodology, and Framework for Information Management in Support of Decision-Enabling Tasks in the Building Industry, Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA.
15. Kamara J. & Anumba C. (2001). A critical appraisal of the briefing process in construction, Journal of construction research, World Scientific, Hong Kong, 1(2) 13-24.
16. Khemlani L. (2005). Viewpoints Series, AEC Bytes, http://aecbytes.com/ viewpoint/
17. Kiviniemi A. (2005). PREMISS - Requirements Management Interface to Building Product Models, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, CA, USA.
18. Kunz J. & Fischer M. (2005). Virtual Design and Construction, Working Paper, CIFE, Stanford University.
19. Kunz W. & Rittel H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems, Working Paper No. 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
20. Leventhal R. (2001). Best Practices in Sustainability, Architecture Week, No. 50, 2001.0516, pN1.1.
21. Martin M., Heylighen A. & Cavallin H. (2005). The right story at the right time, AI & Society, Volume 19, Number 1, January, 34-47.
22. Schon D. (1991). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Avebury: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
23. Song W., Flemming A., Aouad G. & Cooper R. (2001). The development of the process protocol mapping methodology and tool, Proceedings of international postgraduate research in the built and human environment (Sun, Aouad, Ormerod and Ruddock, editors) University of Salford, UK, March, 595-606.