Combining size distribution and chemical species measurements into a multivariate receptor model of PM2.5

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 111, Issue 10, 2006, Pages

  Larson, Timothy V ^a   Covert, David S ^b   Kim, Eugene ^c   Elleman, Robert ^b   Schreuder, Astrid B ^b   Lumley, Thomas ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Clarkson University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; IRON; MANGANESE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

AERODYNAMICS; MASS BALANCE; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTANT SOURCE; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; VOLUME;

EID: 33745919510     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006285     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bein, K. J., Y. Zhao, A. S. Wexler, and M. V. Johnston (2005), Speciation of size-resolved individual ultrafine particles in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S05, doi:10.1029/ 2004JD004708.
2. Canagaratna, M. R. J., et al. (2004), Case studies of particulate emissions from in-use New York City vehicles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 555-573.
3. Clegg, S. L., P. Brimblecombe, and A. S. Wexler (1998), Thermodynamic model of the system H+-NH4+SO4 = -N03-H2O at tropospheric temperatures, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102(12), 2137-2154.
4. Goswami, E., T. Larson, T. Lumley, and S. L.-J. Liu (2002), Spatial characteristics of fine particulate matter: Identifying representative monitoring locations in Seattle, Washington, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 52, 324-333.
5. Henry, R. C. (1997), History and fundamentals of air quality receptor models, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 37, 37-42.
6. Henry, R. C. (2003), Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 65, 179-189.
7. Hopke, P. K. (1997), Receptor modeling for air quality management, Environ. Sci. Technol., 8, 95-117.
8. Kerminen, V. M., T. E. Maleka, C. H. Ojanen, R. E. Hillamo, J. K. Vilhunen, L. Rantanen, N. Havers, A. V. Bohlen, and D. Klockow (1997), Characterization of the particulate phase in the exhaust of a diesel car, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1883-1889.
9. Kim, E., P. K. Hopke, T. V. Larson, N. N. Maykut, and J. Lewtas (2004a), Factor analysis of Seattle fine particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 724-738.
10. Kim, E., P. Hopke, T. V. Larson, and D. S. Covert (2004b), Analysis of ambient particle size distributions using UNMIX and positive matrix factorization, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 202-209.
11. Kim, E., P. K. Hopke, and Y. Qin (2005), Estimation of organic carbon blank values and error structures of the speciation trends network data for source apportionment, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 55, 1190-1199.
12. Kittelson, D. B. (1998), Engines and nanoparticles: A review, J. Aerosol Sci., 29, 575-588.
13. Kleeman, M. J., J. J. Schauer, and G. R. Cass (1999), Size and composition distribution of fine particulate matter emitted from wood burning, meat charbroiling, and cigarettes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3516-3523.
14. Lewis, C. W., G. A. Norris, T. L. Conner, and R. C. Henry (2003), Source apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 aerosol with the Unmix receptor model, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 53, 325-328.
15. Lyyranen, J., J. Jokiniemi, E. Kauppinen, and J. Joutsensaari (1999), Aerosol characterisation in medium-speed diesel engines operating with heavy fuel oils, J. Aerosol Sci., 30, 771-784.
16. Malm, W. C., J. F. Sisler, D. Huffman, R. A. Eldred, and T. A. Cahill (1994), Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D1), 1347-1370.
17. Maykut, N., J. Lewtas, E. Kim, and T. Larson (2003), Source apportionment of PM2.5 at an urban IMPROVE site in Seattle, WA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 5135-5142.
18. Mosey, N. J., M. H. Muser, and T. K. Woo (2005), Molecular mechanisms for the functionality of lubricant additives, Science, 307, 1612-1615.
19. Paatero, P. (1997), Least square formulation of robust non-negative factor analysis, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 37, 23-35.
20. Paatero, P. (1999), The multilinear engine - A table driven, least square program for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor analysis model, Comput. Graphical Stat., 8(4), 854-888.
21. Paatero, P., and P. K. Hopke (2003), Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor analytic models, Anal. Chim. Acta, 490, 277-289.
22. Park, K., F. Cao, D. B. Kittleson, and P. H. McMurry (2003), Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 577-583.
23. Park, K., D. B. Kittelson, M. R. Zachariah, and P. H. McMurray (2004), Measurement of inherent material density of nanoparticle agglomerates, J. Nanopart. Res., 6, 267-272.
24. Phares, D. J., K. P. Rhoads, M. V. Johnston, and A. S. Wexler (2003), Size-resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis: 2. Houston, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D7), 8420, doi:10.1029/2001JD001212.
25. Pitz, M., J. Cyrys, E. Karg, A. Wiedensohler, H. E. Wichmann, and J. Henirich (2003), Variability in apparent particle density of an urban aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 4336-4342.
26. Polissar, A. V., P. K. Hopke, P. Paatero, W. C. Malm, and J. F. Sisler (1998), Atmospheric aerosol over Alaska: 1. Elemental composition and sources, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D15), 19,045-19,057.
27. Polissar, A. V., P. K. Hopke, and R. L. Poirot (2001), Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: Chemical composition and source, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4604-4621.
28. Research Triangle Institute (2004), Extended semi-annual data summary report for the chemical speciation of PM2.5 filter samples, Proj. RTI/ 07565/06DS, Research Triangle Park, N. C. (Also available as Quality assurance projects plan chemical speciation of PM2.5 filter samples, Research Triangle Park, N.C. (Available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ files/ambient/pm25/spec/rtiqap.pdf)
29. Rhoads, K. P., D. J. Phares, A. S. Wexler, and M. V. Johnston (2003), Size-resolved ultrafine particle composition analysis: 1. Atlanta, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D7), 8418, doi:10.1029/2001JD001211.
30. Ruuskanen, J., et al. (2001), Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities, Atmos. Environ., 35(21), 3729-3738.
31. 10) in the Los Angeles Basin, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S08, doi:10.1029/2004JD004627.
32. Shi, J. P., D. Mark, and R. M. Harrison (2000), Characterization of particles from a current technology heavy-duty diesel engine, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 748-755.
33. Tolocka, M. P., D. A. Lake, M. V. Johnston, and A. S. Wexler (2005), Size-resolved fine and ultrafine particle composition in Baltimore, Maryland, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S04, doi:10.1029/2004JD004573.
34. Wahlin, P., F. Palmgren, R. V. Dingenen, and F. Raes (2001), Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relationship to traffic, Atmos. Environ., 35(S1), S63-S69.
35. Wexler, A. S., and J. H. Seinfeld (1990), The distribution of ammonium salts among a size and composition dispersed aerosol, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 24, 1231-1246.
36. Zhang, Q., M. R. Canagaratna, J. T. Jayne, D. R. Worsnop, and J. L. Jimenez (2005), Time- and size-resolved chemical composition of submicron particles in Pittsburgh: Implications for aerosol sources and processes, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S09, doi:10.1029/2004JD004649.
37. Zhou, L., E. Kim, P. K. Hopke, C. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis (2004), Advanced factor analysis on Pittsburgh particle size distribution data, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38, 118-132.
38. Zhou, L., P. K. Hopke, C. O. Stanier, S. N. Pandis, J. M. Ondov, and P. Pancras (2005), Investigation of the relationship between chemical composition and size distribution of airborne particles by partial least squares and positive matrix factorization, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D07S18, doi: 10.1029/2004JD005050.