An ontology definition framework for model driven development

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3983 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 746-755

  Duan, Yucong ^a   Fu, Xiaolan ^b   Hu, Qingwu ^c   Gu, Yuqing ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^c China Development Center for NEC Telecom System ^*  (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; SEMANTICS;

INTERTRANSFORMATIONS; MODEL DRIVEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT (MDSD); ONTOLOGY; UNIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33745913619     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11751632_81     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Gerd Wagner. The Agent-Object-Relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior. Inf. Syst. 28(5): 475-504 (2003).
2. Brian Henderson-Sellers. UML - the Good, the Bad or the Ugly? Perspectives from a panel of experts. Software and System Modeling 4(1): 4-13 (2005)
3. Leon J. Osterweil. Understanding process and the quest for deeper questions in software engineering research. ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2003: 6-14
4. Alexander Egyed. Heterogeneous Views Integration and its Automation, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Southern California, 2000.
5. Kendall Scott, UML Explained. Publisher:Addison-Wesley, 2001. ISBN: 0201 72182.
6. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 1918. http://www.wmelchior.com/wis/philo/wittgenstein/works/tractatus/tlp.htm
7. Natasha Noy,Alan RectorDefining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web: Use With Individuals.WSC Working Draft 21 July 2004.This version//www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-swbpn-aryRelations-20040721
8. Barry W. Boehm, Daniel Port. Conceptual Modeling Challenges for Model-Based Architecting and Software Engineering (MBASE). Conceptual Modeling 1997: 24-43
9. Yucong Duan, Xiaolan Fu, S.C. Cheung, Yuqing Gu. An Entity-Relationship Model Based Conceptual Framework for Model Driven Development, In Proc. of IASTED Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (SE2006), Innsbruck, Austria, Feb. 14-16, 2006, pp. 200-205.
10. Peter P. Chen: The Entity-Relationship Model - Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1): 9-36 (1976)
11. B.Tekinerdogan. Synthesis Based Software Architecture Design, Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands, March 2000.
12. Ross Jeffery. Achieving Software Development Performance Improvement Through Process Change. Invited talk in Software Process Workshop 2005, Beijing, China, May26, 2005. http://www.cnsqa.com/cnsqa/jsp/html/spw/ppt/ Achieving%20Software%20Development%20Performance%20Improvement.pdf
13. DSTC, Gentleware, IBM, Sandpiper Software.Ontology Definition MetaModel. August 23rd, 2004. http://codip.grci.com/odm/draft/submission_text/ODMPrelimSubAug04R1.pdf.
14. M. Dahchour and A. Pirotte. The semantics of reifying relationships as classes. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS'02, pages 580-586, Ciudad Real, Spain, April 2002.
15. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
16. Yucong Duan, S.C. Cheung, Xiaolan Fu and Yuqing Gu, A Metamodel Based Model Transformation Approach, in Proc. of SERA 2005, MI, USA, Aug. 11-12, 2005, pp. 184-191.
17. Natalya Fridman Noy, Deborah L. McGuinness. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology . Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05. March 2001.
18. Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean, Communications of the ACM, 45(2): pp. 61-65
19. Liwu Li, Ontological modeling for software application development, Advances in Engineering Software, v.36 n.3, p.147-157, March 2005
20. Gruninger, M. and Fox, M.S. Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI-95, Montreal. (1995)
21. McGuinness, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J. and Wilder, S. An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference (KR2000). A. G. Cohn, F. Giunchiglia and B. Selman, editors. San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. (2000)
22. Rosch, E. Principles of Categorization. Cognition and Categorization. R. E. and B. B. Lloyd, editors. Hillside, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers: 27-48. (1978)
23. Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2).
24. Quine, W.V.O. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, New York, London, 1969.
25. Guarino, N. and Welty, C. Identity, unity, and individuality: Towards a formal toolkit for ontological analysis. In Proceedings of ECAI-2000: The European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
26. York Sure, Asunción Gómez-Pérez, Walter Daelemans, Marie-Laure Reinberger, Nicola Guarino, Natalya Fridman Noy: Why Evaluate Ontology Technologies? Because It Works!. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4): 74-81 (2004)
27. Rich Hilliard. Aspects, Concerns, Subjects, Views. In First. Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns in. Object-oriented Systems (at OOPSLA '99), 1999.
28. Holger Knublauch. Ontology-Driven Software Development in the Context of the Semantic Web: An Example Scenario with Protégé/OWL. International Workshop on the Model-Driven Semantic Web, Monterey, CA (2004)
29. Yucong Duan, Yuqing Gu, Xiaolan Fu. A Conceptual Approach to Modeling Model Driven Development Processes, in Proceedings of International Conference on Systems (ICONS'06), Mauritius, April 27-29, 2006, IEEE Computer Society Press, (in press)
30. Roger Lee, Ashok Harikumar, Chia-Chu Chiang, Hae Sool Yang, Haeng-Kon Kim, Byeongdo Kang: A Framework for Dynamically Converting Components to Web Services. SERA 2005: 431-437