A conceptual approach to modeling model driven development processes

Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies,ICN/ICONS/MCL'06

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 179-

  Duan, Yucong ^a   Gu, Yuqing ^a   Fu, Xiaolan ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF SOFTWARE   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

MANY MODEL DRIVEN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT (MDSD); SYSTEMIC GUIDELINES; TRACEABILITY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33750952314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICNICONSMCL.2006.5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Jorn Bettin, Model-Driven Software Development: An emerging paradigm for industrialized software asset development, 2004, http://www.softmetaware.com/ mdsd-and-isad.pdf.
2. Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, version 2.0, Revised Final Adopted specification, ptc/04-05-02, http://www.omg.org/uml/
3. Y. Jia, M.Tan, Y.Q. Gu. The Evolutionary Approach to Semantics-Driven CBD Automation. EUROMICRO 2002, pp.98-102.
4. P. Forbrig, R. Laemmel, D. Mannhaupt. Pattern-Oriented Development with Rational Rose. RationalEdge, January, 2001.
5. M.S. Pallos. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is the next wave of application development. EAI Journal. Dec., 2001.
6. D. Batory. Feature-Oriented Programming and the AHEAD Tool Suite. ICSE'04, pp.702-703
7. M. Kande. A Concern-Oriented Approach to Software Architecture. PhD Thesis, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2003.
8. Anthony I. Wasserman.User Software Engineering and the design of interactive systems. 5th ICSE. San Diego, California, United States. 1981. Pages: 387-393.
9. A. Rashid, A. Moreira, and J. Araujo. Modularisation and Composition of Aspectual Requirements. 2nd Int'l Conf. on Aspect-Oriented Software Development. 2003. pp.11-20.
10. J. Mylopoulos, M. Kolp, P. Giorgini. Agent-Oriented Software Development. SETN 2002. Pages: 3-17.
11. M. VanHilst, D. Notkin. Decoupling Change from Design. In Proc. of FSE 1996, Pages: 58-69
12. Myrice Company. Use-Case-Driven Development. http://taihu.myrice.com/ se_tool/rational/rup/manuals/intro/im_feat2.htm.
13. T. Olson, N. Reizer, J. Over. Software Process Framework for the SEI Capability Maturity Model. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/94. reports/94.hb.001.html.
14. M. Heller, A. Schleicher, B. Westfechtel, A Management System for Evolving Development Processes, Integrated Design and Process Technology, IDPT-2003.
15. S. Clarke, R. J. Walker. Composition Patterns: An Approach to Designing Reusable Aspects. In Proc. of the 23rd ICSE, Toronto, Canada, May 2001.
16. A. Egyed. Heterogeneous Views Integration and its Automation, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Southern California, 2000.
17. Sage, A. P., Lynch, C. L. Systems Integration and Architecting: An Overview of Principles, Practices, and Perspectives, Systems Engineering, The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering, 1(3), pp. 176-226, 1998.
18. J.H. Hausmann, R. H., G. Taentzer. Reference, Detection of Conflicting Functional Requirements in a Use Case-Driven Approach. ICSE 2002. pp.105-115.
19. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, Addison Wesley, 1999.
20. P. Tarr, H. Ossher, W. Harrison, S. M. Sutton. N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns. ICSE 1999, Pages: 107-119, 1999.
21. B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, A. Finkelstein, ViewPoints: Meaningful Relationships Are Difficult!, Invited paper, Proc. of ICSE'03, Postland, Oregon, USA, May 2003.
22. R.Hilliard. Aspects, Concerns, Subjects, Views,.In First Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns in Object-oriented Systems (at OOPSLA '99).
23. S. M. Sutton Jr., I. Rouvellou, Issues in the Design and Implementation of a Concern-Space Modeling Schema http://www.research.ibm.com/hyperspace/ workshops/icse2001/Papers/sutton.pdf
24. Plasil, F., Mencl, V. Getting "Whole Picture" Behavior in a Use Case Model, Trans. of SDPS: Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, v 7(4), 2003. pp. 63-79.
25. Y.C. Duan, X.L. Fu, S.C. Cheung, Y.Q. Gu. An Entity-Relationship Model Based Conceptual Framework for Model Driven Development, In Proc. of IASTED Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (SE2006), Innsbruck, Austria, Feb., 2006. (to appear)
26. J.S. Le, D.H. Bae. An enhanced role model for alleviating the role-binding anomal. Software - Practice and Experience 32(14): 1317-1344 (2002)
27. S. Herrmann. Views and Concerns and Interrelationships - Lessons Learned from Developing the Multi - View Software Engineering Environment PIROL. PhD thesis, Technical University Berlin, 2002.
28. J. Miller, J. Mukerji.MCW. Guide Version 1.0.1. 2003 OMG.www.omg.org/ docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf
29. Y.C. Duan, S.C. Cheung, X.L. Fu, Y.Q. Gu, A Metamodel Based Model Transformation Approach, in Proc. of 3rd ACIS Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management & Applications (SERA 2005), MI, USA, Aug., 2005, pp. 184-191.
30. A. Agrawal. A Metamodel based model transformation language. Conf. on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications archive Companion of the 18th OOPSL4.2003.pp. 386-387
31. Mehandjiev, N., Brereton, P., Layzell, P., Lewis, G., Mannion, M. and Coallier, F. Thirteen Knights and the Seven-headed Dragon: an Interdisciplinary Software Engineering Framework, in Proc. of STEP2002, 2003.
32. Y.C. Duan, Y.Q. Gu. A Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns Approach for Model Driven Software Development Process Framework Modeling in Chinese Journal of Software, 2006 (to appear).
33. M. Sletvold. T. Gran. G. Nystuen. Optimizing the development process. http://roots.dnd.no/downloads/2003/Sletvold_Mary/ Optimizing_the_Development_Process.pdf.
34. B. Boehm. Requirements that Handle IKIWISI, COTS, and Rapid Change, Computer, 33(7): pp.99-102, July 2000.