ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task

Brain Research

Volumn 1097, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 205-215

  Niedeggen, Michael ^a   Hesselmann, Guido ^a   Sahraie, Arash ^b   Milders, Maarten ^b  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; ERPs; Psychophysics; Stimulus appearance; Visual motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COLOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RATING SCALE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33745905335     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.087     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bach M., and Ullrich D. Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials. Vision Res. 34 (1994) 1541-1547
2. Braddick O.J., O'Brien J.M., Wattam-Bell J., Atkinson J., Hartley T., and Turner R. Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion. Perception 30 (2001) 61-72
3. Broadbent D.E., and Broadbent M.H.P. From detection to identification: response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Percept. Psychophys. 42 (1987) 105-113
4. Carrasco M., Ling S., and Read S. Attention alters appearance. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 308-313
5. Chelazzi L., Miller E.K., and Desimone J. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363 (1993) 345-347
6. Chun M.M., and Potter M.C. A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21 (1995) 109-127
7. Corbetta M., and Shulman G.L. Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. Biol. Sci. 353 (1998) 1353-1362
8. Dick M., Ullman S., and Sagi D. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. Science 237 (1987) 400-402
9. Eriksen C.W., and Murphy T.D. Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: a critical look at the evidence. Percept. Psychophys. 42 (1987) 299-305
10. Hashimoto T., Kashii S., Kikuchi M., Honda Y., Nagamine N., and Shibasaki H. Temporal profile of visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal stimulation analyzed with a whole-head magnetometer. Exp. Brain Res. 125 (1999) 375-382
11. Heeger D.J., Huk A.C., Geisler W.S., and Albrecht D.G. Spikes versus BOLD: what does neuroimaging tell us about neuronal activity?. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 631-633
12. Hesselmann G., Niedeggen M., Sahraie A., and Milders M. Specifying the distractor inhibition account of attention-induced motion blindness. Vision Res. 46 (2006) 1048-1056
13. Huk A.C., and Heeger D.J. Task related modulation of visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 83 (2000) 3525-3536
14. Joseph J.S., Chun M.M., and Nakayama K. Attentional requirements in a 'preattentive' feature search task. Nature 387 (1997) 805-807
15. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., Keller T.A., Emery L., Zajac H., and Thulborn K.R. Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. NeuroImage 14 (2001) 417-426
16. Kanwisher N. Neural events and perceptual awareness. Cognition 79 (2001) 89-113
17. Kirk R.E. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioural Sciences (1982), Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA
18. Kubová Z., Kuba M., Spekreijse H., and Blakemore C. Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res. 35 (1995) 197-205
19. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21 (1995) 451-468
20. Lehmann D., and Skrandies W. Multichannel mapping of spatial distribution of scalp potential fields evoked by checkerboard reversal to different retinal areas. In: Lehmann D., and Callaway E. (Eds). Human Evoked Potentials: Applications and Problems (1979), Plenum, New York 201-214
21. Luck S.J. Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial search: recent evidence from human electrophysiology. Behav. Brain Res. 71 (1995) 113-123
22. Mangun G.R., and Hillyard S.A. Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance. Percept. Psychophys. 47 (1990) 532-550
23. Mazurek M.E., Roitman J.D., Ditterich J., and Shadlen M.N. A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb. Cortex 13 (2003) 1257-1269
24. Muller R., Gopfert E., Leineweber M., and Greenlee M.W. Effect of adaptation direction on the motion VEP and perceived speed of drifting gratings. Vision Res. 44 (2004) 2381-2392
25. Nakamura H., Kashii S., Nagamine T., Matsui Y., Hashimoto T., Honda Y., and Shibasaki H. Human V5 demonstrated by magnetoencephalography using random dot kinematograms of different coherence levels. Neurosci. Res. 46 (2003) 423-433
26. Nakayama K., and Silverman G.H. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature 320 (1986) 264-265
27. Nelson D.A., and Lassman F.M. Combined effects of recovery period and stimulus intensity on the human auditory evoked vertex response. J. Speech Hear. Res. 16 (1973) 297-308
28. Niedeggen M., and Wist E.R. Characteristics of visual evoked potentials generated by motion coherence onset. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 8 (1999) 95-105
29. Niedeggen M., Sahraie A., Hesselmann G., Milders M., and Blakemore C. Is experimental motion blindness due to sensory suppression? An ERP approach. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 13 (2002) 241-247
30. Niedeggen M., Hesselmann G., Sahraie A., Milders M., and Blakemore C. Probing the prerequisites for motion blindness. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 584-597
31. Parasuraman R. Event-related brain potentials and human factors research. In: Rohrbaugh J.W., Parasuraman R., and Johnson R. (Eds). Event-Related Brain Potentials (1990), Oxford Press, New York 279-300
32. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 116 (1994) 220-244
33. Pinilla T., Cobo A., Torres K., and Valdes-Sosa M. Attentional shifts between surfaces: effects on detection and early brain potentials. Vision Res. 41 (2001) 1619-1630
34. Prinzmetal W., Nwachuku I., Bodanski I., Blumenfeld L., and Shimizu N. The phenomenology of attention. Conscious. Cogn. 6 (1997) 372-412
35. Prinzmetal W., Amiri H., Allen K., and Edwards T. The phenomenology of attention: 1. Colour, location, orientation and spatial frequency. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 261-282
36. Rees G., Frith C., and Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying the attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278 (1997) 1616-1619
37. Rees G., Friston K., and Koch C. A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 716-723
38. Rees G., Frith C., and Lavie N. Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task. Neuropsychologia 39 (2001) 937-949
39. Rolke B., Heil M., Streb J., and Hennighausen E. Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 165-174
40. Sahraie A., Milders M., and Niedeggen M. Attention induced motion blindness. Vision Res. 41 (2001) 1613-1617
41. Salzman C.D., and Newsome W.T. Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. Science 264 (1994) 231-237
42. Sergent S., and Dehaene S. Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon? Evidence for an all-or-none bifurcation during the attentional blink. Psych. Sci. 15 (2004) 720-728
43. Seki K., Nakasato N., Fujita S., Hatanaka K., Kawamura T., Kanno A., and Yoshimoto T. Neuromagnetic evidence that the P100 component of the pattern reversal visual evoked response originates in the bottom of the calcarine fissure. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100 (1996) 436-442
44. Shapiro K.L. The Limits of Attention: Temporal Constraints in Human Information Processing (2001), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
45. Shapiro K.L., Raymond J.E., and Arnell K.M. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20 (1994) 357-371
46. Tsal Y. Movements of attention across the visual field. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 9 (1983) 523-530
47. Tsal Y., Shalev L., Zakay D., and Lubow R.E. Attention reduces brightness contrast. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 47 (1994) 865-893
48. Vaina L.M., Lemay M., Bienfang D.C., Choi A.Y., and Nakayama K. Intact "biological motion" and "structure from motion" perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis. Neurosci. 5 (1990) 353-369
49. Valdes-Sosa M., Cobo A., and Pinilla T. Transparent motion and object-based attention. Cognition 66 (1998) B13-B23
50. Valdes-Sosa M., Cobo A., and Pinilla T. Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (2000) 1656-1674
51. Vandenberghe R., Duncan J., Dupont P., Ward R., Poline J.B., Bormans G., Michiels J., Mortelmans L.A., and Orban G.A. Attention to one or two features in left or right visual field: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurosci. 17 (1997) 3739-3750
52. Vogel E., Luck S.J., and Shapiro K.L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998) 1656-1674
53. Woods D.L., Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., and Galambos R. Recovery cycles of event-related potentials in multiple detection tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 50 (1980) 335-347