Probing the prerequisites for motion blindness

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 584-597

  Niedeggen, Michael ^a   Hesselmann, Guido ^a   Sahraie, Arash ^b   Milders, Maarten ^b   Blakemore, Colin ^c  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BLINDNESS; CHANNEL GATING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEUROBIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 2442563682     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892904323057317     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bach, M., & Ullrich, D. (1994). Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials. Vision Research, 34, 1541-1547.
2. Bar, M., Tootell, R. B., Schacter, D. L., Greve, D. N., Fischl, B., Mendola, J. D., Rosen, B. R., & Dale, A. M. (2001). Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron, 29, 529-535.
3. Beck, D., Rees, G., Frith, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645-650.
4. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
5. Botvinnick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissel, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402, 179-181.
6. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
8. 15O PET study on Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2, 264-272.
9. Cohen, R. A., Kaplan, R. F., Moser, D. J., Jenkins, M. A., & Wilkinson, H. (1999). Impairments of attention after cingulotomy. Neurology, 53, 819-824.
10. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., & Riviere, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752-758.
11. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioural Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
12. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
13. Duncan, J., Ward, R., & Shapiro, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
14. Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123-138.
15. Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 1-19.
16. Hesselmann, G., Niedeggen, M., Sahraie, A., Milders, M., & Hay, J. (2002). Motion blindness explained by frontal gating. Perception, 31, 31.
17. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanism of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284-291.
18. Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., & Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task. Nature, 387, 805-807.
19. Kanwisher, N., Yin, C., & Wojciulik, E. (1999). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 119-150). Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Karayandis, F., & Michie, P. T. (1996). Frontal processing negativity in a visual selective attention task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 38-56.
21. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R., & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3 and the late lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 19-27.
22. Kubová, Z., Kuba, M., Spekreijse, H., & Blakemore, C. (1995). Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Research, 35, 197-205.
23. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468.
24. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264.
25. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: An electrophysiological analysis. International Journal of Neuroscience, 80, 281-297.
26. Macmillan, N. (1986). The psychophysics of subliminal perception. Behavioural Brain Sciences, 9, 38-39.
27. Maki, W. S., Couture, T., Frigen, K., & Lien, D. (1997). Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: Perceptual interference and retrieval competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1393-1411.
28. McCarthy, G., & Woods, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
29. Näätänen, R. (1982). Processing negativity: An evoked potential reflection of selective attention. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 605-640.
30. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Niedeggen, M., Sahraie, A., Hesselmann, G., Milders, M., & Blakemore, C. (2002). Is experimental motion blindness due to sensory suppression? An ERP approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 241-247.
32. Niedeggen, M., & Wist, E. R. (1998). The physiological substrate of the motion aftereffect. In G. Mather, F. Verstraten, & S. Anstis (Eds.), The motion aftereffect (pp. 125-157). Cambridge: MIT Press.
33. Niedeggen, M., & Wist, E. R. (1999). Characteristics of visual evoked potentials generated by motion coherence onset. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 95-105.
34. Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423-434.
35. Pinnilla, T., Cobo, A., Torres, K., & Valdes-Sosa, M. (2001). Attentional shifts between surfaces: Effects on detection and early brain potentials. Vision Research, 41, 1619-1630.
36. Posner, M., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (1998). Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 401-424). Cambridge: MIT Press.
37. Rees, G., Frith, C., & Lavie, N. (1997). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying the attentional load in an unrelated task. Science, 278, 1616-1619.
38. Rees, G., Frith, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task. Neuropsychologia, 39, 937-949.
39. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
40. Sahraie, A., Milders, M., & Niedeggen, M. (2001). Attention induced motion blindness. Vision Research, 41, 1613-1617.
41. Shapiro, K. L., & Luck, S. J. (1999). The attentional blink: A front-end mechanism for fleeting memories. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories, (pp. 95-118). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Shapiro, K. L., & Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language, (pp. 151-188). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Shelley, A. M., Ward, P. B., Michie, P. T., Andrews, S., Mitchell, P. F., Catts, S. V., & McConaghy, N. (1991). Effects of repeated testing on ERP components during auditory selective attention. Psychophysiology, 28, 496-510.
44. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267.
45. Trejo, L. J., Kramer, A. F., & Arnold, J. A. (1995). Event-related potentials as indices of display-monitoring performance. Biological Psychology, 40, 33-71.
46. Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinnilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
47. Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 343-427.
48. Vogel, E., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.