How should financial support for research be distributed to Universities? The Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in England and Wales

Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 104-108

  Goldberg, David ^a   Mann, Anthony ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Improving quality; RAE; Research Assessment Exercise; Research support

Indexed keywords

EXERCISE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

EID: 33745881920     PISSN: 1121189X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1121189x00004292     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Association of University Teachers (2005). Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.aut.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=l30
2. Banatvala J., Bell P. & Symonds M. (2005). The Research Assessment Exercise is bad for UK medicine. Lancet 365(9464), 1025-1026.
3. Higher Education Funding Council (2003). Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/assessment/
4. th Report on the Research Assessment Exercise. HC 586. HMSO: London.
5. Roberts G. (2003). Consultation by the UK funding bodies on the review. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/ pubs/hefce/2003/03_22.htm
6. Tomlinson S. (2000). The research assessment exercise and medical research British Medical Journal 320, 636-639.
7. Williams G.(1998). Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise. British Medical Journal 316, 1079-1082.