National health preference data: A useful resource for health services research

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 310-312

  Revicki, Dennis A ^a  

^a UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATING SCALE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 33745879154     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06291334     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE. Comparison of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994;32:551-67.
2. Anderson JP. Activity limitations reported by the national health interview survey: an anomaly and its effect on QWBX1 estimates of well-being [letter]. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1135-6.
3. Lou N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, Feeny D, Coons SJ. Self-reported health status of the general adult US population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care. 2005;43:1078-86.
4. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric; 1998.
5. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:410-20.
6. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:401-9.
7. Hanmer J, Lawrence WF, Anderson JP, Kaplan RM, Fryback DG. Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:391-400.
8. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF Jr, Ghushchyan V. A national catalogue of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the US. Med Care. 2005;43:736-49.
9. Revicki DA. Measuring health outcomes for cost-effectiveness studies: are all quality-adjusted life years created equal? DIA J. 1995;29:1459-67.
10. Revicki DA, Feeny D, Hunt TL, Cole BF. Analyzing oncology clinical trial data using the Q-TWiST method: clinical importance and sources for health state preference data. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:411-23.
11. Guyatt G, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371-83.
12. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, et al. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:285-95.
13. Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, VonKorff M. SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care. 1998;36:567-72.