Socio-cognitive gaps in participatory design meetings;Décalages socio-cognitifs en réunions de conception participative

Travail Humain

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 315-337

  Cahour, B ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

Design Decisions; Participation; Participative Frame; Points of View Integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 19244372299     PISSN: 00411868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/th.654.0315     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bange, P. (1992). Analyse conversationnelle et théorie de l'action. Paris: Hatier Didier.
2. Borzeix, A., & Linhart, D. (1988). La participation: un clair obscur. Sociologie du Travail, 1, 37-53.
3. Boutet, J. (1994). Construire le sens. Berne: Peter Lang.
4. Brereton, M.F., Cannon, D.M., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L.J. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing Design Activity (pp. 37-53). Chichester: John Wiley.
5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness; Strategies in Social Interactions (pp. 56-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Caccamise, D.J. (1995). Implementation of a team approach to nuclear criticality safety: The use of participatory methods in macroergonomics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 397-409.
7. Cahour, B., & Karsenty, L. (1996). Contextes cognitifs et dysfonctionnements de la communication. Interaction et Cognitions, 1, 485-510.
8. Cahour, B., & Pemberton, L. (2001). A model of conversational positionings in cooperative design dialogues. Al and Society, 15, 344-358.
9. Cahour, B. (1998). Interunderstanding and subjectivity in commercial dialogue. In S. Cmerjrkova & J. Hoffmanova (Eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI (pp. 167-178). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
10. Cook, M. (1977). Gaze and mutual gaze in social encounters. American Scientist, 65, 328-333.
11. Cross, N., & Clayburn-Cross, A. (1996). Observations of teamwork and social processes in Design. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, & K. Dorst (Eds.), Analysing Design Activity (pp. 271-299). Chichester: John Wiley.
12. Daniellou, F. (1988). Ergonomie et démarche de conception dans les industries de processus continus; quelques étapes-clés. Le Travail Humain, 51, 185-194.
13. Daniellou, F., & Garrigou, A. (1995). L'ergonome, l'activité et la parole des travailleurs. In J. Boutet (Ed.), Paroles au travail (pp. 73-92). Paris: L'Harmattan.
14. Darses, F. (2002). Trois conditions socio-techniques pour l'optimisation de la conception continue du système de production. Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle, 21, 23-47.
15. Darses, F., & Falzon, P. (1996). La conception collective: une approche de l'ergonomie cognitive. In G. de Terssac & J. Friedberg (Eds.), Cooperation et conception (pp. 54-69). Toulouse: Octarès.
16. Détienne, F., Visser, W., D'Astous, P., & Robillard, N. (1999). Two complementary approaches in the analysis of design team work: The functional and interactional approaches. Paper presented at the Basic Research Symposium of the Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems CHI'99. Pittsburgh, PA: May.
17. Dejours, Ch. (1987). Plaisir et souffrance dans le travail. Paris: AOCIP.
18. Garrigou, A. (1992). Les apports des confrontations socio-cognitives au sein de processus de conception participatifs: le rôle de l'ergonomie. Thèse de doctorat, Paris: CNAM.
19. Garrigou, A., Daniellou, F., Carballeda, G., & Ruaud, S. (1995). Activity analysis in participatory design and analysis of participatory design activity. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 311-327.
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
21. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. New York: Doubleday.
22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
23. Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22-33.
24. Lorant, F., & Cahour, B. (2002). Fonction des regards pour l'intégration des points de vue dans les réunions de conception participative. In F. Darses (Ed.), Intégration des points de vue en conception (pp. 30-67). Paris: CNAM.
25. Lipiansky, E.M. (1992). Identité et communication. Paris: PUF.
26. Martin, G., Détienne, F., & Lavigne, E. (2000). An ergonomic study on the design process in concurrent engineering. Paper presented at The coop Workshop on Analysing and Modelling Collective Design. Sophia Antipolis, F, June.
27. McNeese, M.D., Zaff, B.S., Citera, M., Brown, C.E., & Whitaker, R. (1995). AKADAM: Eliciting user knowledge to support participatory ergonomics, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 345-363.
28. Sainsaulieu, R. (1988). L'identité au travail. Paris: Presses de Sciences Politiques.
29. Vermersch, P. (1994). L'entretien d'explicitation. Paris: ESF.
30. Visser, W. (1993). Collective design: A cognitive analysis of cooperation in practice. In F.M. Roozenburg (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 93 (pp. 385-392). Zürich, CH: Heuristica.
31. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H., & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.
32. Wilson, J.R. (1995). Solution ownership in participative work redesign: The case of a crane control room. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 329-344.
33. Zarifian, P. (1996). Travail et communication. Essai sociologique sur le travail dans la grande entreprise industrielle. Paris: PUF.