Persuasion artifices to promote wellbeing

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3962 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 84-95

  De Rosis, Fiorella ^a   Mazzotta, Irene ^a   Miceli, Maria ^b   Poggi, Isabella ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^c ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; STRATEGIC PLANNING; USER INTERFACES;

A-RATIONAL PERSUASION; PERSUASION ARTIFICES; PERSUASION DIALOGS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 33745852224     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11755494_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Walton, D.N.: The place of emotion in argument. Philadelphia: The Pennsylvania State University Press (1992)
2. Jorgensen, P. E.: Affect, persuasion and communication processes. In Andersen, P. A. and Guerrero L. K. (eds.): Handbook of Communication and Emotion. Academic Press (1998)
3. Miceli, M., de Rosis, F. and Poggi, I.: Emotional and non emotional persuasion. Applied Artificial Intelligence: an International Journal. In press
4. Toulmin, S.: The Use of Arguments. Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University Press (1958)
5. Kienpointner, M.: How to Classify Arguments. In van Eermeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R., Blair, J.A. and Willard C.A. (eds.): Argumentation Illuminated (1992) 178-188
6. Walton, D.N.: Nonfallacious Arguments From Ignorance. American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1991) 381-387
7. Walton, D.N., and Reed, C.A.: Argumentation schemes and defeasible inferences. In Carenini, G., Grasso, F., and Reed, C. (eds.): Working Notes of the ECAI'2002 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Lyon (2002)
8. Poggi, I.: The goals of persuasion. Pragmatics and Cognition, 13: 2 (2005) 297-336
9. Lazarus, R.S. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Schwarz, N. 1990. Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E.T. Higgins and R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. New York: Guilford Press. Vol. 2, pp. 527-561.
11. Festinger, L.: A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL. (1957)
12. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Networks of Plausible Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann (Pubs.) (1988)
13. Spiegelhalter, D.J. 1986. Probabilistic Reasoning in L.N.Kanal and J.F.Lemmer (Eds.), Predictive Expert System, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. North-Holland: Elsevier Science, 4, pp. 357-369.
14. Zukerman, I., Jinah, N., McConachy, R. and George, S.: Recognizing intentions from rejoinders in a bayesian interactive argumentation system. In PRICAI2000 Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia (2000) 241-251
15. Gratton, C.: Counterexamples and degree of support. In Carenini, G., Grasso, F., and Reed, C. (eds.): Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, in the scope of ECAI'02 Lyon (2002)
16. Das, S.: Logic of probabilistic arguments. In Carenini, G., Grasso, F., and Reed, C. (eds.): Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, in the scope of ECAI'02. Lyon (2002)
17. Green, N.: Towards an empirical model of argumentation in medical genetics. In Carenini, G., Grasso, F., and Reed, C. (eds.): Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments, Acapulco (2003)
18. Carofiglio, V.: Modelling argumentation with belief networks. Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Arguments (CMNA'04), Valencia (2004) 22-24