Publishing integrative landscape research: analysis of editorial policies of peer-reviewed journals

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 466-475

  Tress, Gunther ^a   Tress, Bärbel ^a   Fry, Gary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Aims and scope; Bibliometrics; Interdisciplinarity; Journal editors; Publication bias; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE; LANDSCAPE; NOMENCLATURE; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 33745851107     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahern J. Spatial concepts, planning strategies and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. In: Klopatek J., and Gardner R. (Eds). Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications (1999), Springer-Verlag, New York 175-201
2. Antrop, M., 2000. Geography and landscape science. Belgeo 1-4, special issue "29th International Geographical Congress" 9-36.
3. Antrop M. The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 55 (2001) 163-173
4. Bachmann D., Elfrink J., and Vazzana G. Tracking the progress of E-mail versus snail-mail. Market. Res. 8 (1996) 31-35
5. Balsiger P.W. Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36 (2004) 407-421
6. Boissel J.-P., and Haugh M.C. The iceberg phenomenon and publication bias: the Editors' fault?. Clin. Trial Meta-Anal. 28 (1993) 309-315
7. Brandt J. Editorial: the landscape of landscape ecologists. Landsc. Ecol. 15 (2000) 181-185
8. Bruce A., Lyall C., Tait J., and Williams R. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36 (2004) 457-470
9. Burel F., and Baudry J. Social, aesthetic and ecological aspects of hedgerows in rural landscapes as a framework for greenways. Landsc. Urban Plan. 33 (1995) 327-340
10. COSEPUP (Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2004), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11153.html
11. Daily G.C., and Ehrlich P.R. Managing earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2 (1999) 277-280
12. Décamps H. Demanding more of landscape research (and researchers). Landsc. Urban Plan. 47 (2000) 105-109
13. De Marchi M., and Rocchi M. The editorial policies of scientific journals: testing an impact factor model. Scientometrics 51 2 (2001) 395-404
14. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263 10 (1990) 1385-1389
15. Dickersin K., and Min Y.I. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 703 (1993) 135-148
16. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys (1999), Wiley, New York
17. Duffy P.A., Guertal E.A., and Muntifering R.B. The pleasures and pitfalls of interdisciplinary research in agriculture. J. Agribusiness 15 2 (1997) 139-159
18. Ferguson R. Publication practices in physical and human geography: a comment on Nigel Thrift's 'The future of geography'. Geoforum 34 (2003) 9-11
19. Fry G. Multifunctional landscapes-towards transdisciplinary research. Landsc. Urban Plan. 57 (2001) 159-168
20. Höll A., and Nilsson K. Cultural landscape as subject to national research programmes in Denmark. Landsc. Urban Plan. 46 (1999) 15-27
21. Jakobsen C.H., Hels T., and McLaughlin W.J. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. For. Pol. Econ. 6 (2004) 15-31
22. Jantsch E. Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Pol. Sci. 1 (1970) 403-428
23. Klein J.T. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory & Practice (1990), Wayne State University Press, Detroit
24. In: Klijn J., and Vos W. (Eds). From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
25. Latucca L.R. Creating Interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinary Research and Training Among College and University Faculty (2001), Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville
26. Mander U., Palang H., and Ihse M. Editorial: development of European landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 67 (2004) 1-8
27. Metzger N., and Zare R.N. Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 283 5402 (1999) 642-643
28. Møller A.P., and Jennions M.D. Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 10 (2001) 580-586
29. Moss M. Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 15 (2000) 303-311
30. Musacchio L.R., and Wu J. Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: emerging trends in urban and regional ecology. Urban Ecosyst. 7 (2004) 175-178
31. Naiman R.J. A perspective on interdisciplinary science. Ecosystems 2 (1999) 292-295
32. Nassauer J.I. Culture and changing landscape structure. Landsc. Ecol. 10 4 (1995) 229-237
33. Naveh Z. Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Landsc. Urban Plan. 32 (1995) 43-54
34. Olson C.M., Rennie D., Cook D., Dickersin K., Flanagin A., Hogan J.W., Zhu Q., Reling J., and Pace B. Publication bias in editorial decision making. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287 21 (2002) 2825-2828
35. Opdam P., Foppen R., and Vos C. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 16 (2002) 767-779
36. Preston C., Ashby D., and Smyth R. Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection process. J. Eval. Clin. Res. 10 (2004) 313-322
37. Quinlan T., and Scogings P. Why bio-physical and social scientists can speak the same language when addressing sustainable development. Environ. Sci. Pol. 7 (2004) 537-546
38. Rinia E.J., van Leeuwen T.N., Bruins E.E.W., van Vuren H.G., and van Raan A.F.J. Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics 51 1 (2001) 293-309
39. Schaefer D.R., and Dillman D.A. Development of a standard E-mail methodology: results of an experiment. Public Opin. Quart. 62 (1998) 378-397
40. Sohn D. Publication bias and the evaluation of psychotherapy efficacy in reviews of the research literature. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 16 2 (1996) 147-156
41. Spanner D. Border crossings: understanding the cultural and informational dilemmas of interdisciplinary scholars. J. Acad. Librarianship 27 5 (2001) 352-360
42. Sterling R.J. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance or vice versa. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 54 (1959) 30-34
43. Tress B., Tress G., Décamps H., and d'Hauteserre A. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landsc. Urban Plan. 57 (2001) 137-141
44. Tress B., Tress G., and Fry G. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 70 (2005) 177-191
45. Tress B., Tress G., and Fry G. Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ. Manage. 36 6 (2005) 792-807
46. Tress G., Tress B., and Fry G. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landsc. Ecol. 20 4 (2005) 479-493
47. Van Kerkhoff L. Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ. Sci. Pol. 8 5 (2005) 452-463
48. Wear D.N. Challenges to interdisciplinary discourse. Ecosystems 2 (1999) 299-301
49. In: Weingart P., and Stehr N. (Eds). Practicing Interdisciplinarity (2000), University of Toronto Press, Toronto
50. Winder, N., 2003. Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (=integrative) research. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies, Delta Series 2, Wageningen, pp. 74-90.
51. Wu J., and Hobbs R. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc. Ecol. 17 (2002) 265-355