Survey of consent practices for inpatient colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at a tertiary referral center

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1340-1345

  Seow, Cynthia H ^a,c   Leber, Jacqueline M ^a   Ee, Hooi C ^a   Yusoff, Ian F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; ERCP; Informed consent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL STAFF; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 33745821262     PISSN: 08159319     EISSN: 14401746     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04152.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for Informed Consent for Endoscopic Procedures. Guidelines in Gastroenterology. London: British Society of Gastroenterology, 1999.
2. O'Sullivan S, Crippen C, Ponich T. Are patients informed when they consent to ERCP? Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2002; 16: 154-8.
3. Triantafyllou K, Stanciu C, Kruse A, Malfertheiner P, Axon A, Ladas SD. Informed consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a 2002 ESGE survey. Dig. Dis. 2002; 20: 280-3.
4. Newton J, Hawes R, Jamidar P, Harig J, Lehman G. Survey of informed consent for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1994; 39: 1714-18.
5. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Informed Consent: Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Mississauga: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 1997.
6. Soweid A, Zuccaro G, Ferguson D, Sivak M. Indications, contraindications, and complications of diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In: Sivak M, ed. Gastroenterologic Endoscopy, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000; 828-44.
7. Rankin G, Sivak M. Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy. In: Sivak M, ed. Gastroenterologic Endoscopy, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000; 1462-75.
8. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: S273-82.
9. Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications. Med. Clin. North Am. 2002; 86: 1253-88.
10. Viiala CH, Zimmerman M, Cullen DJ, Hoffman NE. Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment. Intern. Med. J. 2003; 33: 355-9.
11. Quine MA, Colin-Jones D. Safe practice of endoscopy. Postgrad. Med. J. 2000; 76: 455-6.
12. Acea Nebril B. [Informed consent in digestive endoscopy. Who should inform?]. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2001; 24: 145.
13. Neale G. Informed consent. Gut 2000; 46: 5-6.
14. Stanciu C, Novis B, Ladas S et al. Recommendations of the ESGE workshop on informed consent for digestive endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 772-4.
15. Huntley JS, Shields DA, Stallworthy NK. Consent obtained by the junior house officer: is it informed? J. R. Soc. Med. 1998; 91: 528-30.
16. Pereira SP, Hussaini SH, Wilkinson ML. Informed consent for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 1995; 37: 151-3.