Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning

Biological Conservation

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 336-342

  Cabeza, Mar ^a   Moilanen, Atte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Benefit function; Irreplaceability; Maximum coverage; Replacement cost; Reserve selection; Summed irreplaceability

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL METHOD; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); CONSERVATION STATUS; LAND USE; RESERVE DESIGN;

EID: 33745743628     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arponen A., Heikkinen R., Thomas C.D., and Moilanen A. The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: representation, species weighting and benefit functions. Conservation Biology 19 (2005) 2009-2014
2. Ball, I.R., Possingham, H.P., 2001. The design of marine protected areas: adapting terrestrial techniques. In: Ghassemi, F., Whetton, P., Little, R., Littleboy, M. (Eds.), Integration Models for Natural Resources, Management Across Disciplines, Issues and Scales: Proceedings of the International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, The Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 769-774.
3. Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (2001) 242-248
4. Ferrier S., Pressey R.L., and Barrett W. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation 93 (2000) 303-325
5. IUCN, 2004. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. URL: http://www.redlist.org/ (31 March 2006).
6. Leslie H., Ruckelshaus M., Ball I.R., Andelman S., and Possingham H.P. Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications 13 (2003) S185-S198
7. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
8. Prendergast J.R., Quinn R.M., and Lawton J.H. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology 13 (1999) 484-492
9. Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning for the real world. Parks 9 (1999) 1-6
10. Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Wright R.I., and Williams P.H. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 (1993) 124-128
11. Pressey R.L., Johnson I.R., and Wilson P.D. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3 (1994) 242-262
12. Pressey R.L., Whish G.L., Barrett T.W., and Watts M.E. Effectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Wales: recent trends in six measures. Biological Conservation 106 (2002) 57-69
13. Pressey R.L., Watts M.E., and Barrett T.W. Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves. Ecology Letters 7 (2004) 1035-1046
14. Rebelo A.G. Iterative selection procedures: centres of endemism and optimal placement of reserves. In: Huntley B.J. (Ed). Botanical Diversity in Southern Africa (1994), National Botanical Institute, Pretoria 231-257
15. Stewart R.R., Noyce T., and Possingham H.P. Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Marine Ecology Progress series 253 (2003) 25-38
16. Williams J., ReVelle C.S., and Levin S.A. Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 (2004) 98-105