New aspects of hearing aid fitting in noise-induced hearing loss;Neue aspekte zur hörgeräteversorgung bei lärmschwerhö rigkeit

HNO

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 573-582

  Kiessling J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feedback suppression; Hearing aids; Noise induced hearing loss; Open fitting; Workplace

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NOISE; REVIEW; SOUND; TECHNOLOGY; WORKPLACE;

GERMANY; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 33745742513     PISSN: 00176192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1423-6     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Agnew J, Thornton JM (2000) Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 11: 330-336
2. Arlinger S, Billermark E (1999) One year follow-up of users of a digital hearing aid. Br J Audiol 33: 223-232
3. Boymans M, Dreschler WA (2000) Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology 39: 260-268
4. Boymans M, Dreschler WA, Schoneveld P, Verschuure H (1999) Clinical evaluation of a full-digital inthe-ear hearing instrument. Audiology 38: 99-108
5. Brosch S, Michels L, Mauz PS et al. (2005) Einflussfaktoren auf die Rehabilitation der Innenohrschwerhörigkeit mit Hörgeräten. HNO 53: 142-147
6. Brusis T (2001) Hörgeräte-Verordnung bei Lärmschwerhö rigkeit. HNO 49: 670-671
7. Dyrlund O, Bisgaard N (1991) Acoustic feedback margin improvements in hearing instruments using a prototype DFS (digital feedback suppression) system. Scand Audiol 20: 49-53
8. Dyrlund O, Henningsen LB, Bisgaard N, Jensen JH (1994) Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument. Scand Audiol 23: 135-138
9. Feldmann H (2001) Fortschreitende Lärmschwerhörigkeit, verursacht durch Hörgeräte - ein Dilemma für den Arbeiter wie für den Gutachter. Laryngorhinootologie 80: 740-742
10. Greenberg JE, Zurek PM, Brantley M (2000) Evaluation of feedback-reduction algorithms for hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 2366-2376
11. Jerram JC, Purdy SC (2001) Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: predictors of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 12: 64-79
12. Joson HA, Asano F, Suzuki Y, Sone T (1993) Adaptive feedback cancellation with frequency compression for hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 3254-3258
13. Kates JM (1999) Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 106: 1010-1019
14. Kates JM (2001) Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation. J Acoust Soc Am 109: 367-378
15. Kiessling J, Brenner B, Jespersen Thunberg C et al. (2005) Occlusion effect of earmolds with different venting systems. J Am Acad Audiol 16: 237-249
16. Kuk FK (1994) Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs. J Am Acad Audiol 5: 44-51
17. Latzel M, Gebhart TM, Kiessling J (2001) Benefit of a digital feedback suppression system for acoustical telephone communication. Scand Audiol Suppl: 69-72
18. Meister H, Kluser H, Wolf A et al. (2000) Klinischer Vergleich eines digitalen mit einem analogen Hörgerät. HNO 48: 287-294
19. Meister H, Lausberg I, Kiessling J et al. (2002) Identifying the needs of elderly, hearing-impaired persons: the importance and utility of hearing aid attributes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 259: 531-534
20. Meister H, Lausberg I, Kiessling J et al. (2002) Determining the importance of fundamental hearing aid attributes. Otol Neurotol 23: 457-462
21. Meister H, Lausberg I, von Wedel H, Walger M (2004) Untersuchung von Faktoren bei der Erstversorgung mit Hörgeräten. Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. HNO 52: 790-797
22. Rafaely B, Roccasalva-Firenze M, Payne E (2000) Feedback path variability modeling for robust hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 107: 2665-2673
23. Schorn K (2004) Hörgeräteüberprüfung in der Praxis. HNO 52: 875-885
24. Wood SA, Lutman ME (2004) Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids. Int J Audiol 43: 144-155