Benefit of a digital feedback suppression system for acoustical telephone communication

Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement

Volumn 30, Issue 52, 2001, Pages 69-72

  Latzel, Matthias ^a,c   Gebhart, Thomas M ^b   Kiessling, Jürgen ^b  

^a Audiology Department   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Audiology Department   (Germany)

Author keywords

Audiometer telephone interface; Digital feedback suppression; Digital hearing aids; Feedback margin; Speech recognition threshold (SRT)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOLOGY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL COMPUTER; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MICROPHONE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TELEPHONE; ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; COMMUNICATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0034744858     PISSN: 01078593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Holmes AE, Chase NA. Listening ability with a telephone adapter. Hearing Instruments 1985; 36.
2. International Telecommunication Union Transmission Performance Characteristics of Pulse Code Modulation Channels. (ITU-T Recommendation G.712-1996). Geneva: ITU International Telecommunication Union. Specification for an Intermediate Reference System. (ITU-T Recommendation P.48-1988). Geneva: ITU.
3. Kochkin S. Customer satisfaction & subjective benefit with high performance hearing aids. The Hear Rev 1996; 3: 16-26.
4. Latzel M, Kiessling J. Communication problems with hearing aids - an epidemiological study. Internal Study for ON Danavox A/S 1997.
5. Latzel M, Kiessling J. Clinical experience with Danalogic - the Giessen Field Trial. Internal Study for GN Danavox A/S 1998.
6. Plyler PN, Burchfield SB, Thelin JW. Telephone communication with in-the-ear hearing aids using acoustic and electromagnetic coupling. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 434-43.
7. Seacord R. Room noise at subscribers telephone locations. J Acoust Soc Am 1940; 12: 183-7.
8. Stock A, Fichtl E, Knoblach W, Boretzki M, Heller O. Über das Tragen von Hörhilfen-Ergebnisse einer epidemiologischen Stuide. Audiologische Akustik 1995; 3: 104-24.
9. Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test Part I: design of the Oldenburg Sentence Test. Z Audiol 1999a; 38: 4-15.
10. Wagener K, Brand T, Kollmeier B. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test Part II: optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Test. Z Audiol 1999b; 38: 44-56.