Correct sizing of the CobraPLA is necessary for valid study results [6]

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 714-715

  Alfery, D D ^a   Ghelher, O ^b   Ezri, T ^c,d   Szmuk, P ^d,e  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c WOLFSON MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d Outcomes Research Institute   (United States)

^e CHILDREN S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGEAL TUBE; LARYNX INJURY; LETTER; MUSCLE TONE; PERILARYNGEAL AIRWAY TUBE; SORE THROAT;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 33745726740     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S026502150626112X     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Turan A, Kaya G, Koyuncu O, Karamanlioglu B, Pamukcu Z. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and laryngeal tube (LT) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) in short surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23(3): 234-238.
2. Gaitini L, Yanovski B, Somri M, Vaida S, Riad T, Alfery D. A comparison between the PLA Cobra and the laryngeal mask airway unique during spontaneous ventilation: a randomized prospective study. Anesth Analg 2006; 102(2): 631-636.