The cemented MS-30 stem. A multi-surgeon series of 333 consecutive cases;Der zementierte MS-30-schaft. Ergebnisse einer multi-surgeon-serie von 333 konsekutiven fällen

Orthopade

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 776-783

  Clauss, M ^a   Reitzel, T ^a   Pritsch, M ^b   Schlegel, U J ^a   Bitsch, R G ^a   Ewerbeck, V ^a   Mau, H ^a   Breusch, S J ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cement; Mid term results; Primary; Straight stem; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; EVALUATION; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MERLE D AUBIGNE AND POSTE SCORE; PEER REVIEW; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PUBLICATION; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745713150     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0956-4     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Barrack RL (2000) Early failure of modern cemented stems. J Arthroplasty 15(8): 1036-1050
2. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(3): 385-389
3. Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM (1978) Total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(3): 306-313
4. Berli B, Elke R, Morscher EW (eds) (2003) The cemented MS-30 Stem in total hip replacement, matte versus polished surface: minimum of five years of clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study. West Conshohocken: ASTM International 100 Barr Harbour Drive
5. Berli BJ, Schafer D, Morscher EW (2005) Ten-year survival of the MS-30 matt-surfaced cemented stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(7): 928-933
6. Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (1999) Assessing the outcomes: what really works? Orthopedics 22(9): 823-825
7. Breusch SJ (2005) The optimal cement mantle. In: Breusch SJ, Malchau H (eds) The well cemented total hip arthroplasty. In theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 125-140
8. Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Kreutzer J et al. (2001) Dependency of cement mantle thickness on femoral stem design and centralizer. J Arthroplasty 16(5): 648-657
9. Britton A, Murray D, Bulstrode C et al. (1995) Loss to follow-up: does it matter? Lancet 345(8963): 1511-1512
10. Britton AR, Murray DW, Bulstrode CJ et al. (1996) Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(5): 802-808
11. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8): 1629-1632
12. Chambers IR, Fender D, McCaskie AW et al. (2001) Radiological features predictive of aseptic loosening in cemented Charnley femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6): 838-842
13. Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB (1996) A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 275(11): 858-865
14. Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54(1): 61-76
15. Clohisy JC, Harris WH (1999) Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(2): 247-255
16. Dorey FJ, Korn EL (1987) Effective sample sizes for confidence intervals for survival probabilities. Stat Med 6(6): 679-687
17. Dorr LD, Luckett M, Conaty JP (1990) Total hiparthroplasties in patients younger than 45 years. A nine to ten year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 260: 215-219
18. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA et al. (1994) The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(1): 77-87
19. Faulkner A, Kennedy LG, Baxter K et al. (1998) Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. Health Technol Assess 2(6): 1-133
20. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ, Ling RS (1988) Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19(3): 477-489
21. Freeman MA, Plante-Bordeneuve P (1994) Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(3): 432-438
22. Garellick G, Malchau H, Regner H, Herberts P (1999) The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 14(4): 414-425
23. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141: 17-27
24. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4): 737-755
25. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B et al. (2000) The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71(4): 337-353
26. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71(2): 111-121
27. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K (1998) Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(4): 573-576
28. Iwaki H, Scott G, Freeman MA (2002) The natural history and significance of radiolucent lines at a cemented femoral interface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(4): 550-5555
29. Iwase T, Wingstrand I, Persson BM et al. (2002) The ScanHip total hip arthroplasty: radiographic assessment of 72 hips after 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 73(1): 54-59
30. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR et al. (1991) The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(4): 551-558
31. Johnston RC, Crowninshield RD (1983) Roentgenologic results of total hip arthroplasty. A ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 181: 92-98
32. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH et al. (1990) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(2): 161-168
33. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(6): 912-917
34. Kobayashi A, Donnelly WJ, Scott G, Freeman MA (1997) Early radiological observations may predict the long-term survival of femoral hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4): 583-589
35. Krismer M, Biedermann R, Stockl B et al. (1999) The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(2): 273-280
36. Loudon JR, Charnley J. (1980) Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62(4): 450-453
37. Malchau H (1996) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Failure mechanisms and outcomes. Orthopedics 19(9): 769-770
38. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfeit L (1993) Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 64(5): 497-506
39. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T et al. (2002) The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(Suppl 2): 2-20
40. Malchau H, Karrholm J, Wang YX, Herberts P (1995) Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66(5): 418-424
41. Maloney WJ (2001) National Joint Replacement Registries: has the time come? J Bone Joint Surg Am 83(10): 1582-1585
42. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH (1990) Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(6): 966-970
43. Marubini E, Valsecchi M (1995) Analysing survival data from clinical trial and observational studies. Wiley, Chichester
44. Massoud SN, Hunter JB, Holdsworth BJ et al. (1997) Early femoral loosening in one design of cemented hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(4): 603-608
45. McCaskie AW, Brown AR, Thompson JR, Gregg PJ (1996) Radiological evaluation of the interfaces after cemented total hip replacement. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2): 191-194
46. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M (1954) Functional results of the hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36(3): 451-475
47. Middleton RG, Howie DW, Costi K, Sharpe P (1998) Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation. Clin Orthop 355: 47-56
48. Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ, Collis DK, Johnston RC (1995) Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(9): 1315-1322
49. Morscher EW, Wirz D (2002) Current state of cement fixation in THR. Acta Orthop Belg 68(1): 1-12
50. Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1990) The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(5): 757-760
51. Mulroy WF, Harris WH (1997) Acetabular and femoral fixation 15 years after cemented total hip surgery. Clin Orthop 337: 118-128
52. Murray DW, Britton AR, Bulstrode CJ (1997) Loss to follow-up matters. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(2): 254-257
53. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode CJ (1995) Which primary total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(4): 520-527
54. Oishi CS, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr (1994) The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(8): 1130-1136
55. Ong A, Wong KL, Lai M et al. (2002) Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(5): 786-792
56. Owen TD, Moran CG, Smith SR, Pinder IM (1994) Results of uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(2): 258-262
57. Puolakka TJ, Pajamaki KJ, Halonen PJ et al. (2001) The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 72(5): 433-441
58. Savilahti S, Myllyneva I, Lindholm TS et al. (1995) Clinical outcome and survival of Link RS total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(3): 369-373
59. Smith SW, Estok DM 2nd, Harris WH (1998) Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(11): 1632-1640
60. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP et al. (1999) The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(4): 481-492
61. Spotorno L, Grappiolo G, Penenberg BL, Burastero G (2002) Eight to eleven year review of hybrid THA using a polished femoral stem and cementless Titanium acetabulum. AAOS, Dallas
62. Verdonshot N (2005) Stem design philosophies. In: Breusch SJ, Malchau H (eds) The well cemented total hip arthroplasty. In theory and practice. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, pp 168-179
63. Williams HD, Browne G, Gie GA et al. (2002) The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3): 324-334
64. Woolson ST, Haber DF (1996) Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(5): 698-705