Interobserver concordance in functional assessment by Barthel index;Concordancia interobservador en la valoración funcional mediante el índice de Barthel

Revista Clinica Espanola

Volumn 206, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 230-232

  Formiga, F ^a   Ortega, C ^a   Cabot, C ^a   Porras, F ^a   Mascaro, J ^a   Pujol, R ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI DE BELLVITGE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Barthel index; Elderly; Reproductiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; EATING; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GERONTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESIDENT; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 33745712584     PISSN: 00142565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2565(06)72781-3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Valderrama Gama E, Pérez del Molinero Martín J. Una visión crítica de las escalas de valoración funcional traducidas al castellano. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 1997; 32:297-306.
2. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. A simple incex of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-5.
3. Cid Ruzafa J, Damían Moreno J. Valoración de la discapacidad física: el índice de Barthel. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1997;2:127-37.
4. Batzán JJ, Pérez del Molino J, Alarcón T, San Cristóbal E, Izquierdo G, Manzarbeitia, J. Índice de Barthel: instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 1993;28:32-40.
5. Valverde MD, Flórez M, Sánchez I. Escala de actividades de la vida diaria. Rehabilitación. 1994;28:377-88.
6. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975; 23:433-41
7. Gresham GE, Phillips TF, Labi ML. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:335-8.
8. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:14-7.
9. Collin C, Wade DT, Davis S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61-3.
10. McDowell I, Newll C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
11. Richards SH, Peters TJ, Coast J, Gunnell DJ, Daelow MA, Pounsford J. Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse? Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:72-8.
12. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Barthel index information elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:9-18.
13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987:40:378-83.
14. Dixon WJ, Brown MB, Engelman L, Jennrich RI. BMDP statistical software manual. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.