Mandates and management challenges in the trenches: An intergovernmental perspective on homeland security

Public Administration Review

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 522-536

  Caruson, Kiki ^a,b   MacManus, Susan A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Department of Political Science ^*  (United States)

^c Florida Institute of Government   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745699116     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00613.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Bush, Jeb. 2004. Governor Bush and Executive Command Staff Participate in Annual Terrorism Exercise. News release, Office of the Governor, February 5. www.floridadisaster.org [accessed April 3, 2006].
2. Canada, Ben. 2003. Federal Assistance to State and Local Governments. In Homeland Security: Best Practices for Local Government, edited by Roger L. Kemp, 11-20. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
3. Carter, Ashton B. 2001. The Architecture of Government in the Face of Terrorism. International Security 26(3): 5-23.
4. Caruson, Kiki, and Susan A. MacManus. 2005. Homeland Security Preparedness: Federal and State Mandates and Local Government. Spectrum: The Journal of State Government 78(2): 25-28.
5. Cleare, Thomas. 2004. Local Government Coordination for Emergency Preparedness: A Focus on Healthcare. PA Tones, July, 4.
6. Elliott, Timothy. 2003. Incident Responsibility and Accountability: Who's in Charge? In Homeland Security: Best Practices for Local Government, edited by Roger L. Kemp, 51-56. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
7. First Response Coalition. 2004. New Coalition Claims FCC's Pending Decision Fails First Responders, Public. PA Times, 27, 1, 10.
8. Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM). 2004. The State of Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 2004. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Division of Emergency Management. www.floridadisaster.org [accessed April 3, 2006].
9. International City/County Management Association (ICMA). 2003. News: Homeland Security Funding for State and Local Governments. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
10. Kayyen, Juliette N., and Robin L. Pangi, eds. 2003. First to Arrive: State and Local Responses to Terrorism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Kemp, Roger L. 2003a. The Future of Homeland Security. In Homeland Security: Best Practices for Local Government, edited by Roger L. Kemp, 135-44. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
12. _, ed. 2003b. Homeland Security: Best Practices For Local Government. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
13. Kettl, Donald F. 2003. Contingent Coordination: Practical and Theoretical Puzzles for Homeland Security. American Review of Public Administration 33(3): 253-77.
14. Kincaid, John, and Richard L. Cole. 2002. Issues of Federalism in Response to Terrorism. Special issue, Public Administration Review 62: 181-92.
15. Lee, Christopher, and Michael A. Fletcher. 2006. Katrina Report Urges Retooled Disaster Plans. Washington Post, February 24.
16. Lipowicz, Alice. 2004. Bush II: More Equipment Standardization for Local Emergency Crews. CQ Homeland Security, November 3.
17. Lipton, Eric. 2006. Many States Are Not Confident in Disaster Plans, Survey Finds. New York Times, February 13.
18. McEnrire, David A., and Amy Myers. 2003. Disaster Preparedness. IQ Reports 35. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
19. McGuire, Michael 2002. Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It, Public Administration Review 62(5): 599-609.
20. McNabb, David E. 2004. Research Methods for Political Science: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
21. McVey, Philip M. 2003. The Local Role in Fighting Terrorism. In Homeland Security: Best Practices For Local Government, edited by Roger L. Kemp, 125-130. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
22. National Association of Counties (NACO). 2004. Homeland Security Funding: The Urban Areas Security Initiative. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
23. National Governors Association (NGA). 2002. States' Homeland Security Priorities. Issue brief, August 19.
24. Posner, Paul L. 2002. Testimony before the House Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Government Efficiency, Financial Management, and Intergovernmental Relations, March 22. In Combating Terrorism: Intergovernmental Partnership in a National Strategy ta Enhance State and Local Preparedness. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-547T.
25. Rabinowitz, Jan. 2002. Homeland Security Outlook. American City and County, August, 30-38.
26. Rockefeller Institute of Government. 2003. The Role of "Home" in Homeland Security: The Challenge for State and Local Government. Symposium Series Nos. 1-4. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
27. Starks, Tim, and Scan Madigan. 2005. Administrations New Homeland Report Puts Emphasis on "Risk-Based" System for Local Grants. CQ Homeland Security, Match 31.
28. Thompson, Frank J., ed. 2002. Introduction: Homeland Security; The State and Local Crucible. Special issue, Public Administration Review 62:18-20.
29. Townsend, Frances Fragos. 2006. Lessons Learned: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina. www.whitehouse.gov/reports/katrina-lessons-learned.pdf [accessed April 3, 2006].
30. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001. Combating Terrorism: Intergovernmental Cooperation in the Development of a National Strategy to Enhance State and Local Preparedness. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-02-550T.
31. Waugh, William L., Jr., and Richard T. Sylves. 2002. Organizing the War on Terrorism. Special issue, Public Administration Review 62: 145-54.
32. Wise, Charles R. 2002. Organizing for Homeland Security. Public Administration Review 62(2): 131-44.
33. Wise, Charles R., and Rania Nader. 2002. Organizing the Federal System for Homeland Security: Problems, Issues, and Dilemmas. Special issue, Public Administration Review 62: 44-57.
34. Zaworski, Martin J. 2004. The Challenges of Law Enforcement Information Sharing in the Post-September 11, 2001 Era. PA Times, July, 5.