New frontiers in network theory development

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 560-568

  Parkhe, Arvind ^a,d   Wasserman, Stanley ^b,e,f   Ralston, David A ^c  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e and Statistics ^*  (United States)

^f Visible Path Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745686599     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2006.21318917     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. 2001. Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA. Rand Corporation.
2. Bacharach, S. B. 1989. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14: 496-515.
3. Baker, S., & Green, H. 2004. Big bang! Business Week, June 21: 68-76.
4. Bierstedt, R. 1959. Nominal and real definitions in sociological theory. In L. Gross (Ed.), Symposium on sociological theory: 121-144. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: Organization science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16: 262-290.
6. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 518-539.
7. Brews, P. J., & Tucci, C. L. 2004. Exploring the structural effects of internetworking. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 429-451.
8. Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. 1990. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effect of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 104-127.
9. Burt, R. S. 1982. Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.
10. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Burt, R. S. 2000. Decay functions. Social Networks, 22: 1-28.
12. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. 2004. Methods and models for social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Castells, M. 2001. The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. de Rond, M., & Bouchikhi, H. 2004. On the dialectics of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 15: 56-69.
15. Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. 1997. Evolution of social networks. New York: Gordon & Breach.
16. Furubotn, E., & Pejovich, S. 1972. Property rights and economic theory: A survey of recent literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 10: 1137-1162.
17. Gerlach, M. L. 1992. The Japanese corporate network: A blockmodel approach. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 105-139.
18. Gnyawali, D., & Madhavan, R. 2001. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 431-445.
19. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
20. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 91: 481-510.
21. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104: 1439-1493.
22. Harary, F. 1959. Graph theoretic methods in the management sciences. Management Science, 5: 387-403.
23. Heider, F. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21: 107-112.
24. Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 275-286.
25. Knoke, D. 2001. Changing organizations: Business networks in the new political economy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342-369.
27. Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Moreno, J. L. 1934. Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy, and sociodrama. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
29. Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 1998. Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 439-459.
30. Monge, P., & Contractor, N. 2003. Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Nadel, S. F. 1957. The theory of social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32. Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. 1997. The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 279-307.
33. Podolny, J. M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107: 33-60.
34. Popper, K. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
35. Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-366.
36. Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562.
37. Sakakibara, M., & Dodgson, M. 2003. Strategic research partnerships: Empirical evidence from Asia. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15: 223-241.
38. Salancik, G. R. 1995. WANTED: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 345-349.
39. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
40. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wellman, B. 1988. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach: 19-61. New York: Cambridge University Press.