Can Rapoport's rule explain tree species richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient, Nepal?

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 373-378

  Bhattarai, Khem Raj ^a,b   Vetaas, Ole R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories ^*  (Nepal)

Author keywords

Elevation; Elevation range; Generalized linear models; Nepal; Rapoport's rule; Species richness; Unimodal relationship

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CORRELATION; RAPOPORT RULE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TREE;

ASIA; EURASIA; HIMALAYAS; NEPAL; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 33745684921     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bhattarai, K.R. & Vetaas, O.L. (2003) Variation in plant species richness of different life forms along a subtropical elevation gradient in the Himalayas, east Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 327-340.
2. Bhattarai, K.R. & Vetaas, O.R. (2005) Do fern and fern-allies show a similar response along the ecological gradient in the Himalayas? Bulletin Department of Plant Resources, 26, 24-29.
3. Bhattarai, K.R., Vetaas, O.R. & Grytnes, J.A. (2004) Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevation gradient, Nepal. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 398-400.
4. Brown, J.H. (2001) Mammals on mountainsides, elevational patterns of diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 101-109.
5. Brühl, C.A., Mohamed, M. & Linsenmair, K.E. (1999) Altitudinal distribution of leaf litter ants along a transect in primary forests on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15, 265-277.
6. Carpenter, C. (2005) The environmental control of plant species density on a Himalayan elevation gradient. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 999-1018.
7. Colwell, R.K. & Hurtt, G.C. (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. The American Naturalist, 144, 570-595.
8. Crawley, M.J. (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
9. Crawley, M.J. (2002) Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using s-plus. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York.
10. Dobremez, J.F. (1976) Le Népal, écologie et biogéographie. Centre National de la Rechereche Scientifique, Paris.
11. Dobson, A.J. (1990) An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London.
12. Fleishman, E., Austin, G.T. & Weiss, A.D. (1998) An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology, 79, 2482-2493.
13. Fraser, D.M, Smith, May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. (1994) Geographical ranges of Australian mammals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 441-4510.
14. Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Spicer, J.I. (1998) Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 70-74.
15. Grytnes, J.A. (2003) Species richness patterns of vascular plants along seven altitudinal transects in Norway. Ecography, 26, 291-300.
16. Grytnes, J.A. & Vetaas, O.R. (2002) Species richness and altitude, a comparison between simulation models and interpolated plant species richness along the Himalayan altitudinal gradient, Nepal. The American Naturalist, 159, 294-304.
17. Hagen, T. (1969) Report on the geological survey of Nepal. Denckschrift derschweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Vol. LXXXVI/I.
18. Hara, H. & Williams, H.J. (1979) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, Vol. II. British Museum Natural History, London.
19. Hara, H., Stearn, W.T. & Williams, H.J. (1978) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, Vol. I. British Museum Natural History, London.
20. Hara, H., Chater, A.O. & Williams, H.J. (1982) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, Vol. III. British Museum Natural History, London.
21. Hastie, T.J. & Pregibon, D. (1993) Generalized linear models. Statistical models in S (ed. by J.M. Chambers and T.J. Hastie), pp. 195-247. Chapman & Hall, London.
22. Hastie, T.J. & Tibshirani, R.J. (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London.
23. Hawkins, B.A. & Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. (2002) The mid-domain effect cannot explain the diversity gradient of Nearctic birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 419-426.
24. Heaney, L.R. (2001) Small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in the Philippines: an assessment of patterns and hypotheses. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 15-39.
25. Huston, M.A. (1994) Biological diversity: the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Kerr, T.K. (1999) Weak link: Rapoport's rule and large-scale species richness patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 8, 47-54.
27. Laurie, H. & Silander, Jr (2002) Geometric constraints and spatial patterns of species richness: critique of range-based models. Diversity and Distributions, 8, 351-364.
28. Lomolino, M.V. (2001) Elevation gradients of species-richness, historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 3-13.
29. MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Geographical ecology: patterns in the distribution of species. Harper & Row, New York.
30. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
31. Md. Nor, S. (2001) Elevational diversity patterns of small mammals on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 41-62.
32. Miehe, G. (1989) Vegetation patterns on Mount Everest as influenced by monsoon and föhn. Vegetatio, 79, 21-32.
33. O'Brien, E.M. (1993) Climatic gradients in woody plant species richness: towards an explanation based on analysis of southern Africa's woody flora. Journal of Biogeography, 20, 181-198.
34. O'Brien, E.M. (1998) Water-energy dynamics, climate and prediction of woody plant species richness: an interim general model. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 379-398.
35. Odland, A. & Birks. H.J.B. (1999) The altitudinal gradient of vascular plant species richness in Aurland, western Norway. Ecography, 22, 548-566.
36. Palmer, M.W. (1992) The coexistence of species in fractal landscapes. The American Naturalist, 139, 375-397.
37. Pandey, R.K. (1995) Development disorders in the Himalayan heights: challenges and strategies for environment and development: altitude geography. Ratna Pustak Bhandar, Kathandu, Nepal.
38. Patterson, B.D., Pacheco, V. & Solari, S. (1996) Distribution of bats along an elevation gradient in the Andes of south-eastern Peru. Journal of Zoology, 240, 637-658.
39. Patterson, B.D., Stotz, D.F., Solari, S., Fitzpatrick, J.W. & Pacheco, V. (1998) Contrasting patterns of elevational zonation for birds and mammals in the Andes of southeastern Peru. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 593-607.
40. Pianka, E.R. (1966) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity, a review of concepts. The American Naturalist, 100, 33-46.
41. Press, J.R., Shrestha, K.K. & Sutton, D.A. (2000) Annotated checklist of the flowering plants of Nepal. The Natural History Museum, London.
42. Rahbek, C. (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness, a uniform pattern? Ecography, 18, 200-205.
43. Rahbek, C. (1997) The relationship among area, elevation and regional species richness in neotropical birds. The American Naturalists, 149, 875-902.
44. Rapoport, E.H. (1975) Areografía: estrategias geograficas des las especies. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico City.
45. Rapoport, E.H. (1982) Areography: geographical strategies of species. Trans. B. Drausal, Vol. 1. Pergamon, New York.
46. Rohde, K. (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity, the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514-527.
47. Rohde, K. (1996) Rapoport's rule is a local phenomenon and can not explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiversity Letters, 3, 10-13.
48. Rohde, K., Heap, M. & Heap, D. (1993) Rapoport's rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. The American Naturalist, 142, 1-16.
49. Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
50. Rowe, R.J. (2005) Elevational gradient analyses and the use of historical museum specimens: a cautionary tale. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1883-1897.
51. Sanders, N.J. (2002) Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule. Ecography, 25, 25-32.
52. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.W. (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 12, 1-20.
53. Smith, F.D.M., May, R.M. & Harvey, P.H. (1994) Geographical ranges of Australian mammals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 441-450.
54. Stainton, J.D.A. (1972) Forest of Nepal. John Murray Publishers, Ltd, London.
55. Stevens, G.C. (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240-256.
56. Stevens, G.C. (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range, an extension of Rapoport's latitudinal rule to altitude. The American Naturalist, 140, 893-911.
57. Terborgh, J. (1977) Bird species diversity on an Andean elevational gradient. Ecology, 58, 1007-1019.
58. Vetaas, O.R. & Grytnes, J.A. (2002) Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 291-301.
59. Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K.J. & Field, R. (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 453-470.
60. Yoda, K. (1967) A preliminary survey of the forest vegetation of eastern Nepal. Journal of Art and Science. Chiba University National Science, 5, 99-140.
61. Zapata, F.A., Gaston, K.J. & Chown, S.L. (2003) Mid-domain models of species richness gradients: assumptions, methods, and evidence. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 677-690.