Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 130-143

  Riva, Pat ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442485680     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Knut Hegna and Eeva Murtomaa, Data Mining MARC to Find: FRBR? (Oslo: Universitet i Oslo), March 13, 2002. Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, http://folk.uio.no/knuthe/dok/frbr/.
2. Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Displays for Multiple Versions from MARC 21 and FRBR (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 2002). Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/multiple-versions.html.
3. Thomas B. Hickey, Edward T. O'Neill, and Jenny Toves, "Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)," D-Lib Magazine 8, no. 9 (2002). Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, www.dlib.org/dlib/september02/hickey/09hickey.html; Rick Bennett, Brian F. Lavoie, and Edward T. O'Neill, "The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: An Application of FRBB," Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 27, no. 1 (2003): 45-59.
4. Thomas B. Hickey, Edward T. O'Neill, and Jenny Toves, "Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)," D-Lib Magazine 8, no. 9 (2002). Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, www.dlib.org/dlib/september02/hickey/09hickey.html; Rick Bennett, Brian F. Lavoie, and Edward T. O'Neill, "The Concept of a Work in WorldCat: An Application of FRBB," Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 27, no. 1 (2003): 45-59.
5. Allyson Carlyle and Joel Summerlin, "Transforming Catalog Displays: Record Clustering for Works of Fiction," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 33, no. 3/4 (2002): 13-25.
6. Joe Altimus, "Serial Linking Notes and MARC 760-787 Fields in OPAC Displays," Advances in Serials Management 5 (1995): 49-65.
7. John Attig, "Descriptive Cataloging Rules and Machine-Readable Record Structures: Some Directions for Parallel Development," in The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging, ed. Elaine Svenonious (San Diego: Academic Press, 1989), 135-48.
8. Melissa M. Bernhardt, "Dealing with Serial Title Changes: Some Theoretical and Practical Considerations," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 9, no. 2 (1988): 25-39.
9. Robert Alan, "Linking Successive Entries Based upon the OCLC Control Number, ISSN, or LCCN," Library Resources & Technical Services 37, no. 4 (1993): 403-13.
10. Beth Guay, "Practical Solutions for Serial Resource Sharing," From Catalog to Gateway, paper no. 17, issued in ALCTS Newsletter Online 12, no. 2 (2001). Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, www.ala.org/cfapps/archive.cfm?path=alcts/alcts_news/v12n/gateway_pap17.html.
11. Barbara Dunham, "Different Formats: Linking Serial Titles for Display through Bibliographic Relationships. Is It Possible?" Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 26, no. 1 (2002): 8.
12. CONSER Editing Guide, 1994 ed., update 14 (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Serial Records Division, 2002), B7.
13. CONSER Cataloging Manual, 2002 ed., Module 14, ed. Jean L. Hirons (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service, 2002), 30.
14. Sherry L. Vellucci, "Uniform Titles as Linking Devices," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 12, no. 1 (1990): 35-62.
15. MARC 21 Concise Format for Bibliographic Data, 2002 concise ed. (Washington, D.C.: Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress, 2002). Accessed Jan. 3, 2004, www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbd-home.html
16. IFLA Working Group on Content Designators, UNIMARC: Universal MARC Format (London: IFLA International Office for UBC, 1977), 54; IFLA Working Group on Content Designators, UNIMARC: Universal MARC Format, 2d ed. (London: IFLA International Office for UBC, 1980), 58.
17. IFLA Working Group on Content Designators, UNIMARC: Universal MARC Format (London: IFLA International Office for UBC, 1977), 54; IFLA Working Group on Content Designators, UNIMARC: Universal MARC Format, 2d ed. (London: IFLA International Office for UBC, 1980), 58.
18. Paula Goossens and E. Mazur-Rzesos, "Hierarchical Relationships in Bibliographic Descriptions: Problem Analysis," in Hierarchical Relationships in Bibliographic Descriptions: INTERMARC Software Subgroup Seminar 4, Library Systems Seminar Essen, Mar. 25-27, 1981, eds. Ahmed H. Helal and Joachim W. Weiss (Essen: Gesamthochschulbibliothek Essen, 1982), 13-128.
19. Barbara B. Tillett, "A Taxonomy of Bibliographic Relationships," Library Resources & Technical Services 35, no. 2 (1991): 150-58.
20. Barbara B. Tillett, "Bibliographic Relationships: An Empirical Study of the LC Machine-Readable Record," Library Resources & Technical Services 36, no. 2 (1992): 162-88.
21. Ibid., 182.
22. Ibid., 179.
23. Barbara B. Tillett, "A Summary of the Treatment of Bibliographic Relationships in Cataloging Rules," Library Resources & Technical Services 35, no. 4 (1991): 393-405.
24. Richard P. Smiraglia, "Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: Linkages in the Bibliographic Universe," in Navigating the Networks: Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994, eds. Deborah Lines Andersen, Thomas J. Galvin, Mark D. Giguere (Medford, N.J.: ASIS, 1994), 167-83.
25. Gregory H. Leazar and Richard P. Smiraglia, "Bibliographic Families in the Library Catalog: A Qualitative Analysis and Grounded Theory," Library Resources & Technical Services 43, no. 4 (1999): 191-212.
26. Richard P. Smiraglia and Gregory H. Leazar, "Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: The Work Relationship in a Global Bibliographic Database," Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50, no. 6 (1999): 493-504.
27. Ibid., 502-3.
28. Leazar and Smiraglia, "Bibliographic Families in the Library Catalog," 193-94.
29. Sherry L. Vellucci, "Bibliographic Relationships," in The Principles and Future of AACR: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Oct. 23-25, 1997, ed. Jean Weihs (Ottawa: Canadian Library Assn., 1998), 105-46.
30. Ibid., 113-14.
31. Ibid., 114.
32. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report, UBCIM Publications. New Series 19 (München: K.G. Saur, 1998) 63-81.
33. Tom Delsey, Functional Analysis of the MARC 21 Bibliographic and Holdings Formats (Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Network Development and MARC Standards Office, 2002), 5. Accessed Dec. 17, 2003, www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functional-analysis/original_frbr.html.
34. Ibid., 6.
35. UNIMARC, 2nd ed., 58.
36. Tillett, "A Summary of the Treatment of Bibliographic Relationships in Cataloging Rules," 401.
37. Ibid., 403.
38. Ibid., 397.
39. Delsey, Functional Analysis, 7.
40. Ibid., appendix A, 85 and 123, note 149.
41. MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic Data, update number 3 (Washington, D.C.: Network Development and MARC Standards Office, Library of Congress, Oct. 2002), [tag] 775, p. 1.
42. The term edition does not equate to the FRBR entity expression. The term as used in the publishing world applies at multiple levels, sometimes to related works, other times to expressions of a work, still other times to manifestations of a single expression. The edition statement itself, as transcribed in field 250, is a manifestation-level attribute. The exact mapping of the many uses of the term edition to FRBR terminology is an area that is particularly controversial.
43. Gregory H. Leazar, "Recent Research on the Sequential Bibliographic Relationship and Its Implications for Standards and the Library Catalog: An Examination of Serials," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 21, no. 3/4 (1996): 209.
44. Sally H. McCallum, "MARC Record-Linking Technique," Information Technology and Libraries 1, no. 3 (1982): 281-91.
45. Field 786 was approved in 1995 as a result of MARBI proposal 94-17A, "Definition of field 786 in the USMARC Bibliographic Format." The intended application was digital geospatial metadata.
46. CONSER Cataloging Manual, module 14, 10, and 29.
47. IFLA, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, 77.
48. Ibid., 80.
49. Ibid., 60-62.
50. Teresa Grimaldi, "L'oggetto della catalogazione," in FRBR Seminar: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Florence, 27th-28th January 2000: Proceedings, ed. Mauro Guerrini (Rome: Associazione italiana biblioteche, 2000), 67-80; also available in the same volume in English translation: Teresa Grimaldi, "The Object of Cataloguing," 64-77.
51. Teresa Grimaldi, "L'oggetto della catalogazione," in FRBR Seminar: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Florence, 27th-28th January 2000: Proceedings, ed. Mauro Guerrini (Rome: Associazione italiana biblioteche, 2000), 67-80; also available in the same volume in English translation: Teresa Grimaldi, "The Object of Cataloguing," 64-77.
52. IFLA, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, section 3.2.2, 18-19.
53. Smiraglia, "Derivative Bibliographic Relationships," 177.
54. Crystal Graham, "Definition and Scope of Multiple Versions," Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 11, no. 2 (1990): 5-32.