Technological innovation assessment of business-to-business electronic marketplaces

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1093-1104

  Yen Chun, Jim Wu ^a   Liu, Hsing Piao ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTERNET; MARKETING; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BUSINESS METHODS; ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACES; PATENT MAP ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PATENT ANALYSES;

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

EID: 33745614926     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20372     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abraham, B.P., & Moitra, S.D. (2001). Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 21, 245-252.
2. Archibugi, D., & Planta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 19(9), 451-468.
3. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25, 233-42.
4. Hicks, D. (2001). The value of CHI's analytical patent databases. Haddon Heights, NJ: CHI Research, Inc.
5. Liu, S.J., & Shyu, J. (1997). Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(5), 661-668.
6. Mogee, M.E. (1991). Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Research-Technology Management, 34, 43-49.
7. Mogee, M.E. (2000). Foreign patenting behaviour of small and large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(1/2), 149-164.
8. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Woolf, P. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 144.
9. Paci, R., Sassu, A., & Usai, S. (1997). International patenting and national technological specialization. Technovation, 17(1), 25-38.
10. Rivette, K.G., & Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Stern, S., Porter, M.P., & Furman, J.L. (2000). The determinants of national innovative capacity (NBER Working Paper No. 7876). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
12. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2000). A USPTO white paper: Automated financial or management data processing methods (business methods). Alexandria, VA: Author.
13. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (Ed.). (2003). Trilateral statistical report (2003 ed.). Alexandria, VA: USPTO, the EPO, and the JPO.
14. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2006a). UPC classification. Retrieved from http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification
15. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (2006b). Our business: An introduction to the USPTO. Retrieved from http://www.uspto.gov/web/menu/intro.html
16. Watanabe, C., Tsuji, Y.S., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2001). Patent statistics: Deciphering a "real" versus a "pseudo" proxy of innovation. Technovation, 21, 783-790.
17. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2006). IPC classification. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/ipc8/?1ang=en