Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 577-589

  Lawrence, Rick L ^a   Daniels, Steven E ^a   Stankey, George H ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; Group value model; Public participation; Self interest model; Social psychology

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0031463220     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941929709381054     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexander, S., and M. Ruderman. 1987. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research 1:117-198.
2. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners Journal 35:216-224.
3. Barrett-Howard, E., and T. R. Tyler. 1986. Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(2):296-304.
4. Behan, R. W. 1966. The myth of the omnipotent forester. Journal of Forestry 64(6):398-400, 407.
5. Blahna, D. J., and S. Yonts-Shepard. 1989. Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society & Natural Resources 2(3):209-227.
6. Bolle, A. W. 1971. Public participation and environmental quality. Natural Resources Journal 11.3:497-505.
7. Brunson, M. 1992. Professional bias, public perspectives, and communication pitfalls for natural resource managers. Rangelands 14(5):292-295.
8. Cohen, R. L. 1985. Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations 38.7:643-663.
9. Conlon, D. E. 1993. Some tests of the self-interest and group-value models of procedural justice: Evidence from an organizational appeal procedure. Academy of Management Journal 36(5):1109-1124.
10. Conlon, D. E., E. A. Lind, and R. I. Lissak. 1989. Nonlinear and nonmonotonic effects of outcome on procedural and distributive fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19(13):1085-1099.
11. Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Shannon. 1993. Embedding public participation in its political context. Journal of Forestry 91(7):14-16.
12. Creighton, J. L. 1983. The use of values: Public participation in the planning process. In Public involvement and social impact assessment, eds. A. D. Gregory, M. W. Garcia, and J. Delli Priscoli, 143-160. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Cuthbertson, I. D. 1983. Evaluating public participation: An approach for government practitioners. In Public involvement and social impact assessment, eds. A. D. Gregory, M. W. Garcia, and J. Delli Priscoli, 101-109. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14. Dana, S. T., and S. K. Fairfax. 1980. Forest and range policy: Its development in the United States, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Dixon, K. M. 1993. The relationship of benefits and fairness to political confidence in the U.S. Forest Service. Master's thesis. Tucson: University of Arizona.
16. Folger, R. 1977. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35(2):108-119.
17. Folger, R., and C. Martin. 1986. Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22(6):531-546.
18. Folger, R., D. Rosenfield, J. Grove, and L. Corkran. 1979. Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(12):2253-2261.
19. Gericke, K. L., J. Sullivan, and J. D. Wellman. 1992. Public participation in national forest planning: Perspectives, procedures, and costs. Journal of Forestry 92:35-39.
20. Gibson, J. L. 1989. Understandings of justice: Institutional legitimacy, procedural justice, and political tolerance. Law & Society Review 23(3):469-496.
21. Greenberg, J. 1987. Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the ends justify the means? Journal of Applied Psychology 72(1):55-61.
22. Hendee, J. C., R. C. Lucas, R. H. Tracey, T. Stead, R. N. Clark, G. H. Stankey, and R. A. Yarnell. 1973. Public involvement and the Forest Service: Experience, effectiveness and suggested direction. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Land and Resource Management Planning.
23. Houlden, P. 1980. Plea bargaining. Law and Society Review 15:267-291.
24. LaTour, S. 1978. Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(12):1531-1545.
25. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, eds. K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, and R. H. Willis, 27-55. New York: Plenum Press.
26. Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Lind, E. A., C. T. Kulik, M. Ambrose, and M. V. de Vera Park. 1993. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly 38:224-251.
28. Lissak, R. I., and B. H. Sheppard. 1983. Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 13(2):45-65.
29. Lyden, F. J., B. W. Twight, and E. T. Tuchmann. 1990. Citizen participation in long-range planning: The RPA experience. Natural Resources Journal 30(1):123-138.
30. Mohai, P. 1985. Public concern and elite involvement in environmental-conservation issues. Social Science Quarterly 66(4):820-838.
31. Pruitt, D. G., and P. J. Carnevale. 1993. Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32. Rasinski, K. A. 1987. What's fair is fair - or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(1):201-211.
33. Shannon, M. A., and K. N. Johnson. 1994. Lessons from the FEMAT: An introduction. Journal of Forestry 92(4):6.
34. Staebler, R. N. 1994a. FEMAT: An intense experience for all. Journal of Forestry 92(3):5.
35. Staebler, R. N. (Ed.). 1994b. FEMAT goes to court. Journal of Forestry 92(4):18.
36. Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Tyler, T. R. 1987. Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(2):333-344.
38. Tyler, T. R. 1989. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(5):830-838.
39. Tyler, T. R., and A. Caine. 1981. The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41(4):642-655.
40. Tyler, T. R., and R. Folger. 1980. Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1:281-292.
41. Tyler, T. R., and K. M. McGraw. 1986. Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues 42(2):115-128.
42. Tyler, T. R., K. A. Rasinski, and N. Spodick. 1985a. Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(1):72-81.
43. Tyler, T. R., K. A. Rasinski, and K. M. McGraw. 1985b. The influence of perceived injustice on endorsement of political leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 15(8):700-725.
44. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1992. Forest Service planning: Accommodating uses, producing outputs, and sustaining ecosystems. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management. 1994. Final supplemental environmental impact statement for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46. Walker, G. B., and S. E. Daniels. 1996. The Clinton administration, the Northwest Forest Conference, and managing conflict: When talk and structure collide. Society & Natural Resources 9:77-91.
47. Walker, L., E. A. Lind, and J. Thibaut. 1979. The relation between procedural and distributive justice. Virginia Law Review 65(8):1401-1420.
48. Wengert, N. 1976. Citizen participation: Practice in search of a theory. Natural Resources Journal 16(1):23-40.
49. Wondolleck, J. M. 1988. Public lands conflict and resolution: Managing national forest disputes. New York: Plenum Press.